SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Huge Caniac

Created by: planter5
Team: 2022-23 Carolina Hurricanes
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 30, 2022
Published: Jun. 30, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$6,000,000
3$3,700,000
1$800,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,300,000
Trades
1.
CAR
  1. van Riemsdyk, James ($3,500,000 retained)
PHI
  1. Gardiner, Jake
  2. Suzuki, Ryan
  3. 2023 3rd round pick (CAR)
2.
TBL
  1. 2023 1st round pick (CAR)
3.
CAR
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander ($1,750,000 retained)
Additional Details:
3 way trade***

Canes get kerfoot 50%

Toronto gets Lorentz + 3rd

Vancouver get
50% kerfoot contract
Bear
TOR
  1. Bear, Ethan [RFA Rights]
  2. Lorentz, Steven [RFA Rights]
  3. 2022 3rd round pick (CHI)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CBJ
2023
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
2024
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$82,499,417$112,500$500,000$583
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$7,750,000$7,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$8,460,250$8,460,250
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,400,000$5,400,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,820,000$4,820,000
C
UFA - 8
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$6,000,000$6,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$4,450,000$4,450,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$925,000$925,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LW, C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$3,700,000$3,700,000
RW
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,300,000$5,300,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,500,000$4,500,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,025,000$4,025,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$762,500$762,500
RD
UFA - 2
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$800,000$800,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$1,800,000$1,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 30, 2022 at 9:06 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,605
Likes: 915
Honestly I like that Leafs trade👍
planter5 liked this.
Jun. 30, 2022 at 9:11 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 177
Likes: 74
For the most part your trades are actually fairly realistic and spot on value-wise, so kudos to you smile

The first trade is pretty good as value...until you see the amount of retention. A team like the Flyers can't afford to retain that much, as this season (like all seasons) they are going to be spending to the cap.

No comments on the TBL trade, it's pretty good and probably what the TBL will get for Killorn, and Killorn in probably the most likely player to be dealt from that team.

The third trade is very solid as far as value goes, except for the part where the Canucks are the ones to retain the salary. The Canucks cannot afford to retain anything as (just like the Flyers) they are going to be spending to the cap already. I think if you change the Canucks to another team (such as the Predators, NJD, or CBJ) the trade is solid.
Hammerwise, planter5 and smkruzik liked this.
Jun. 30, 2022 at 9:12 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,694
Likes: 3,362
Philly says no and I don’t think JVR is the answer to what we’re looking for.

Also wouldn’t send a first for Kilorn. He’s good but Tampa is gonna likely be in a cap crunch so if we can get him for a steal, do it but not sending a first. Rather keep the first or use it to get a higher end player in Necas package.
Hammerwise and planter5 liked this.
Jun. 30, 2022 at 9:23 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 66
Likes: 18
Idk much about lorentz but from a quick glance at his stats, this doesn’t seem like great value for the leafs. I don’t think the value is far off but kerfoot scored 50 points with no PP time, he PKs and can play center or wing. Surely he’s worth more than that
Jun. 30, 2022 at 9:23 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2018
Posts: 6,311
Likes: 2,227
Agree, PHI wont retain that much and LD is probably their deepest position, so its meh prospect Suzuki and a 3rd for 3.5mil in retention.

Lorentz and Bear, even their rights, are worth more than Kerfoot at 50%
Jun. 30, 2022 at 9:29 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,694
Likes: 3,362
Quoting: ViIIains
Idk much about lorentz but from a quick glance at his stats, this doesn’t seem like great value for the leafs. I don’t think the value is far off but kerfoot scored 50 points with no PP time, he PKs and can play center or wing. Surely he’s worth more than that


I get where you’re coming from but seems like Kerfoot is getting about a 2nd on average on here. Lorentz is a young fourth liner with some upside to slot into the middle 6 potentially. He’s not going to be a star or anything but he’s cheap and effective so I’d think a 3rd plus Lorentz is pretty fair value for Kerfoot.
Jun. 30, 2022 at 9:37 a.m.
#7
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: Hammerwise
Agree, PHI wont retain that much and LD is probably their deepest position, so its meh prospect Suzuki and a 3rd for 3.5mil in retention.

Lorentz and Bear, even their rights, are worth more than Kerfoot at 50%


A 26 year old 4th liner is worth more than a 50 point winger making 3.5 million?
Jun. 30, 2022 at 9:39 a.m.
#8
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: vikhodush
I get where you’re coming from but seems like Kerfoot is getting about a 2nd on average on here. Lorentz is a young fourth liner with some upside to slot into the middle 6 potentially. He’s not going to be a star or anything but he’s cheap and effective so I’d think a 3rd plus Lorentz is pretty fair value for Kerfoot.


He's 26, he's less than 2 years younger than Kerfoot. He's not young, he's in his prime and upside at this stage is wishful thinking.
Jun. 30, 2022 at 9:56 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,694
Likes: 3,362
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
He's 26, he's less than 2 years younger than Kerfoot. He's not young, he's in his prime and upside at this stage is wishful thinking.


Sure. Worst case it’s a cheap 4th liner and a 3rd which is probably about what a late second is worth and what Kerfoot typically goes for on here.
Jun. 30, 2022 at 9:57 a.m.
#10
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: vikhodush
Sure. Worst case it’s a cheap 4th liner and a 3rd which is probably about what a late second is worth and what Kerfoot typically goes for on here.


A 4th line bubble player is the easiest thing in hockey to find. Kerfoot can get a much better return than that.
Jun. 30, 2022 at 10:04 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 9,211
Likes: 2,956
Philly might retain 2 million then do that deal. Reduce that cost for us. Philly can buy out Gardiner or use him. A buy out would save them 4 million over keeping him and 3 million over buying out JVR. If they keep him, its a 1 million savings.

A 5 million dollar JVR is still kind of risky but still fairly useful.

Trading a 1st for a rental doesn’t make sense
Jun. 30, 2022 at 10:30 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,694
Likes: 3,362
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
A 4th line bubble player is the easiest thing in hockey to find. Kerfoot can get a much better return than that.


Ok. I don’t think Kerfoot can get a “much better return” than a third rounder alone. Probably a late second rounder so you’ll probably be disappointed if you think he’s getting a first or something.
Jun. 30, 2022 at 10:34 a.m.
#13
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: vikhodush
Ok. I don’t think Kerfoot can get a “much better return” than a third rounder alone. Probably a late second rounder so you’ll probably be disappointed if you think he’s getting a first or something.


A
Quoting: vikhodush
Ok. I don’t think Kerfoot can get a “much better return” than a third rounder alone. Probably a late second rounder so you’ll probably be disappointed if you think he’s getting a first or something.


Late 2nd rounder is better than a 3rd rounder. I would imagine he can get a better prospect and a lesser pick without trouble.
Jun. 30, 2022 at 10:40 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,694
Likes: 3,362
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
A

Late 2nd rounder is better than a 3rd rounder. I would imagine he can get a better prospect and a lesser pick without trouble.


Exactly. These are marginal differences, not a much better return.
Jun. 30, 2022 at 11:45 a.m.
#15
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: vikhodush
Exactly. These are marginal differences, not a much better return.


A 3rd and a throw away contract is about 33% less than a 2nd.
Jun. 30, 2022 at 12:13 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,694
Likes: 3,362
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
A 3rd and a throw away contract is about 33% less than a 2nd.


The difference between a late 2nd and an early 3rd is extremely marginal. Lorentz also fetches a 6th if you want to go down the draft pick rabbit hole so an early 3rd and a 6th is probably very close to a late second.
Jun. 30, 2022 at 12:17 p.m.
#17
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: vikhodush
The difference between a late 2nd and an early 3rd is extremely marginal. Lorentz also fetches a 6th if you want to go down the draft pick rabbit hole so an early 3rd and a 6th is probably very close to a late second.


Probably not
Jun. 30, 2022 at 12:32 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,694
Likes: 3,362
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Probably not


Lol, they're both opinions so you're entitled to yours, I'm entitled to mine. Neither of us will change each other's minds and neither of us are proving anything.
Jun. 30, 2022 at 2:11 p.m.
#19
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: vikhodush
Lol, they're both opinions so you're entitled to yours, I'm entitled to mine. Neither of us will change each other's minds and neither of us are proving anything.


True enough, but it seems like Carolina sees value in Kerfoot but want him cheap.
vikhodush liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll