SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Blueshirts 22-23

Created by: jcu2wire
Team: 2022-23 New York Rangers
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 1, 2022
Published: Jul. 1, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I believe Drury signed Kravtsov with the intention of moving him
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,500,000
2$1,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$3,000,000
2$850,000
Trades
1.
NYR
  1. Dach, Kirby [RFA Rights]
2.
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2023
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the NYR
2024
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$82,500,000$81,419,802$0$3,732,500$1,080,198
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New York Rangers
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the New York Rangers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$11,642,857$11,642,857
LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,200,000$3,200,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$828,333$828,333 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,300,000$2,300,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,641,667$3,641,667
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the New York Rangers
$1,525,000$1,525,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C, RW
RFA - 4
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,666,667$5,666,667
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$8,000,000$8,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 2
$850,000$850,000
G
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the New York Rangers
$762,500$762,500
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 1, 2022 at 12:34 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 880
Chicago easily declines and Rangers decline the Montreal trade.
jance and nyrfan81 liked this.
Jul. 1, 2022 at 12:41 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 100
Likes: 69
Reaves does nothing for Chicago, and him playing there isn't going to help his trade value going forward. So essentially this is a Dach for Georgiev swap. Chicago has young goalies that are developing in the AHL and college. Georgiev might make sense for the Hawks if they were getting ready to exit their rebuild and just needed a goalie who was ready to take the reins and be a #1, but they're not at the point yet. They're a good 3-4 years away, and their prospects are likely going to be ready by then. In the meantime in goal, they'll likely take a salary dump goalie, or sign a cheap FA that teams can light up on a nightly basis. That's not to say if available the Hawks wouldn't take Georgiev, but they're not going to give up one of their better center prospects to do it. Not without something else coming with him.
ChiHawk and nyrfan81 liked this.
Jul. 1, 2022 at 12:44 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 2,371
Likes: 1,548
Quoting: hero9154
Chicago easily declines and Rangers decline the Montreal trade.


Montreal would decline the trade.
Campabee and SMH liked this.
Jul. 1, 2022 at 12:46 p.m.
#4
Le patriote
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 5,985
Likes: 1,301
Change Lundkvist for Schneider and we might retain ....
Jul. 1, 2022 at 12:59 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,777
Likes: 9,032
Chicago blocks your number
nyrfan81 liked this.
Jul. 1, 2022 at 1:26 p.m.
#6
Mr.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 3,598
Likes: 1,178
Any traded that start with retention gets an automatic decline from the habs, this isn't even close to get the habs to do it... getting a really good young-ish middle 6 C who can win you key face offs for 3 years at 3M a season will cost you a hell of a lot more than kravtsov and lundqvist
Jul. 1, 2022 at 1:27 p.m.
#7
Mr.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 3,598
Likes: 1,178
Quoting: hero9154
Chicago easily declines and Rangers decline the Montreal trade.


Tell me you know nothing about the NHL without telling me you know nothing about the NHL

"Rangers decline the habs trade" lol
Jul. 1, 2022 at 2:33 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 461
Likes: 91
Quoting: hero9154
Chicago easily declines and Rangers decline the Montreal trade.


Ditto.
nyrfan81 liked this.
Jul. 5, 2022 at 11:41 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 880
Quoting: SMH
Tell me you know nothing about the NHL without telling me you know nothing about the NHL

"Rangers decline the habs trade" lol


Well for starters I do know a hell of a lot more than you but if we are going to talk about the trade, Rangers decline because they wont send Lundkvist and Kravtsov for a 3C. One of the two yes but not both.
nyrfan81 liked this.
Jul. 5, 2022 at 11:45 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 196
Likes: 61
Quoting: hero9154
Well for starters I do know a hell of a lot more than you but if we are going to talk about the trade, Rangers decline because they wont send Lundkvist and Kravtsov for a 3C. One of the two yes but not both.


This is the correct take.
Jul. 5, 2022 at 12:25 p.m.
#11
Mr.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 3,598
Likes: 1,178
Quoting: hero9154
Well for starters I do know a hell of a lot more than you but if we are going to talk about the trade, Rangers decline because they wont send Lundkvist and Kravtsov for a 3C. One of the two yes but not both.


You clearly don't understand how much this retention is valuable and therefore costly
Jul. 5, 2022 at 12:30 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 880
Quoting: SMH
You clearly don't understand how much this retention is valuable and therefore costly


Like I said Lundkvist and Kravtsov is a no go, Lundkvist and a pick or a younger prospect would probably get it done.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll