SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Trades

(TOR/CHI) - Mrázek + 2022 1st round pick for 2022 2nd round pick

Who won the trade?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Jul. 7, 2022 at 10:22 p.m.
#26
Missouri
Retired V2 V3 GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 3,612
Likes: 1,141
Mrazek should bounce back. Assuming that Chicago won’t buy him out. Share starts with someone?
Jul. 7, 2022 at 10:22 p.m.
#27
bald_and_bankrupt
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 459
Dubas got fleeced badly BAHAHAHAHA
Jul. 7, 2022 at 10:23 p.m.
#28
Kjell_Forsman
BORDEGOD
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 1,310
Likes: 490
Pretty good move for Dubas. Desperately needed cap space and didn't move too far back.
Jul. 7, 2022 at 10:23 p.m.
#29
jpsnow13
You know nothing JS
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 7,028
Likes: 4,418
Toronto fans will paise Dumbas,.... forgetting he's the one who signed this horrible contract LOL
exo2769, Andy_Dick, draft_em_sign_em_trade_em and 1 other person liked this.
Jul. 7, 2022 at 10:24 p.m.
#30
Andy_Dick
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 5,003
Likes: 2,317
Quoting: MadLin27
I said fair deal, but this is move benefits the Leafs greatly.
Chicago turns an early 2nd into a late first and gets a goalie who will help them secure 1st overall next year... lol

Leafs move a bad contract for barely anything.
Shoutout to all the goofs on here that said that moving Mrazek would cost a 1st without anything coming back.


Had him going to Seattle with the same 1st for Hayden Fleury. Didnt see too many not giving anything back, saw more ppl tell me he wasnt being traded with a 1st when he was traded with that 1st.
Jul. 7, 2022 at 10:26 p.m.
#31
BCAPP
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,380
Likes: 3,695
Sigh... While mrazek wasn't my first choice for 1b last summer (it was raanta, then Ullmark (who costed more than a 1b in the end) Mrazek was in the next tier), it was a reasonable gamble that just flopped hard.

The cost is significant but not terrible. Sigh. Time to move on
Jul. 7, 2022 at 10:26 p.m.
#32
IconicHawk
Bedard23
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 9,276
Likes: 4,465
Quoting: BlackwoodForVezina
Brad lambert? I know who won


As we draft someone I have never heard of
exo2769, JackForHart and CFMan liked this.
Jul. 7, 2022 at 10:27 p.m.
#33
WorstTradesPossible
but you’re close.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 267
Likes: 67
Quoting: Nathaniel
Yay, no more Abruzzese, Mrazek, and a first for a fifth!


I’ll give you Bracco and a 2nd to take that back.
NorthernLeafsFan05 liked this.
Jul. 7, 2022 at 10:27 p.m.
#34
exo2769
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,572
Likes: 9,632
I was on the record saying a 2nd and a prospect. It's not exactly what I thought we'd get, but it's higher end than I thought. Leafs win slightly, but the Hawks could afford it. I'm happy with a higher end pick than what I was expecting.
Andy_Dick liked this.
Jul. 7, 2022 at 10:28 p.m.
#35
BCAPP
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,380
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: KSIxSKULLS
I feel like Dubas has to trade assets every year for his terrible signings and trades. Somehow Leafs Nation still think he's a good GM tears of joy


This and Ritchie. Got another example?

Marleau was a Lou signing
Jul. 7, 2022 at 10:29 p.m.
#36
BCAPP
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,380
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: Random2152
Lmao everyone on this site has been screaming for months that it will cost an arm and a leg to move Petr and stupid leafs fans were delusional for saying it would cost anything less and all it ended up costing was 13 spots that amount to virtually no actual draft pick value.

****ing LOL

The fact that after all that, this isn't all the way leafs win says everything you need to know about CF users.
Leafs win easily and it isn't close


The cost to move from 38-> 25 is likely a late second or early 3rd. Around 55-65. So we traded essentially a late second or early 3rd. That's not "virtually no actual draft pick value"
Andy_Dick liked this.
Jul. 7, 2022 at 10:29 p.m.
#37
aadoyle
Hakuna Matata
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 33,610
Likes: 20,845
Quoting: DrDinkiee
Easy win for Leafs


Like there will be silly people going wtf

But if we look at ACGM's it was

Nick Abruzzese + Mrazek + 2023 3rd or 2024 2nd for FC

Dubas trades Mrazek + the 25th OA and gets the 38th OA

I dont know about you but that seems fine to me as while FC is an amazing guy the 38th OA pick is more enticing

Plus with the space we can now go get Kuemper, Campbell, or heck trade for Gibson and sign Husso
Faulk_my_Dzingel and Saskleaf liked this.
Jul. 7, 2022 at 10:31 p.m.
#38
Joe_La_Garnotte
Western Champs
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2015
Posts: 272
Likes: 251
Quoting: Random2152
Lmao everyone on this site has been screaming for months that it will cost an arm and a leg to move Petr and stupid leafs fans were delusional for saying it would cost anything less and all it ended up costing was 13 spots that amount to virtually no actual draft pick value.

****ing LOL

The fact that after all that, this isn't all the way leafs win says everything you need to know about CF users.
Leafs win easily and it isn't close


Still the Leafs are paying again to get out of a bad contract
Andy_Dick liked this.
Jul. 7, 2022 at 10:32 p.m.
#39
JTrades
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 353
I love how all along everyone was commenting how much it would cost to get rid of Mrazek. It starts with Sandin or a 1st plus. Meanwhile, all it took was trading down 13 picks and people still vote that the leafs lost. People love to hate
Jul. 7, 2022 at 10:34 p.m.
#40
Random2152
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 9,207
Likes: 5,572
Quoting: BCAPP
The cost to move from 38-> 25 is likely a late second or early 3rd. Around 55-65. So we traded essentially a late second or early 3rd. That's not "virtually no actual draft pick value"


It's 1.6 gsva to dump 3.8x2
Oilers literally just gave up 2.4 to dump 3.2x2
1.6 gsva is equal to a 3rd or so, which compared to what users here were saying, is pretty much nothing (feel free to go back and look at all the trades and see what I mean).

3.8 aav compared to a 3rd is meaningless. That's a ****ing steal in favour of Toronto, not to mention that Chicago donked the pick lmao
aadoyle liked this.
Jul. 7, 2022 at 10:35 p.m.
#41
Random2152
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 9,207
Likes: 5,572
Quoting: Joe_La_Garnotte
Still the Leafs are paying again to get out of a bad contract


You win some and you lose some. Win big (bunting) and lose small (Petr and ritchie)

That's what good management is about
Jul. 7, 2022 at 10:43 p.m.
#42
LaffsFan
FADING PASSION
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 455
Quoting: KSIxSKULLS
I feel like Dubas has to trade assets every year for his terrible signings and trades. Somehow Leafs Nation still think he's a good GM tears of joy


literally twice
HeroStuff and Saskleaf liked this.
Jul. 7, 2022 at 10:44 p.m.
#43
draft_em_sign_em_trade_em
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 9,140
Likes: 2,219
Lou wins over Dubas once again.

Lou trades 1st Rd pick for a Top 4 Dman, Dubas trades 1st Rd for nothing.

Yea I know Dubas got a 2nd Rd pick back in a seriously weak Draft, maybe 2-5 players Drafted from this 2nd Rd become a regular in the Nhl.
Jul. 7, 2022 at 10:46 p.m.
#44
aadoyle
Hakuna Matata
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 33,610
Likes: 20,845
Quoting: Random2152
It's 1.6 gsva to dump 3.8x2
Oilers literally just gave up 2.4 to dump 3.2x2
1.6 gsva is equal to a 3rd or so, which compared to what users here were saying, is pretty much nothing (feel free to go back and look at all the trades and see what I mean).

3.8 aav compared to a 3rd is meaningless. That's a ****ing steal in favour of Toronto, not to mention that Chicago donked the pick lmao


Honestly this trade reminds me of when the raptors dumped their 1st to get out of Dragic and got a high 2nd

And they ended up with a solid pick

Koloko I believe

If all goes well Dubas at 38 gets one of

Belluz, Beck, Lambert, Howard, Chesley or Goyette
Jul. 7, 2022 at 10:46 p.m.
#45
Bruins1054_gmb
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 465
Quoting: Random2152
Lmao everyone on this site has been screaming for months that it will cost an arm and a leg to move Petr and stupid leafs fans were delusional for saying it would cost anything less and all it ended up costing was 13 spots that amount to virtually no actual draft pick value.

****ing LOL

The fact that after all that, this isn't all the way leafs win says everything you need to know about CF users.
Leafs win easily and it isn't close


It's still a loss. A poor free agent signing resulted in the Leafs paying another team to take the bad contract.
GenXHockey liked this.
Jul. 7, 2022 at 10:49 p.m.
#46
Random2152
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 9,207
Likes: 5,572
Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
It's still a loss. A poor free agent signing resulted in the Leafs paying another team to take the bad contract.


Quoting: Random2152
You win some and you lose some. Win big (bunting) and lose small (Petr and ritchie)

That's what good management is about
Jul. 7, 2022 at 10:52 p.m.
#47
GenXHockey
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,156
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: Random2152
Lmao everyone on this site has been screaming for months that it will cost an arm and a leg to move Petr and stupid leafs fans were delusional for saying it would cost anything less and all it ended up costing was 13 spots that amount to virtually no actual draft pick value.

****ing LOL

The fact that after all that, this isn't all the way leafs win says everything you need to know about CF users.
Leafs win easily and it isn't close


It cost us a 2nd. That is the price for moving down.
Jul. 7, 2022 at 10:54 p.m.
#48
Random2152
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 9,207
Likes: 5,572
Quoting: GenXHockey
It cost us a 2nd. That is the price for moving down.


Cost less (closer to a 3rd), and is below market value (see edm), especially considering what 4 mil aav can buy us over 2 years.

People were saying it would cost us the 1st on its own or sandin to dump Petr. Let's not pretend otherwise and let this website off the hook for its ****ty takes.

This is a great trade for the leafs
Jul. 7, 2022 at 10:58 p.m.
#49
mondo
torontos finest
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 9,557
Likes: 11,184
Quoting: Random2152


I mean it could've been worse. Could've gotten three first round picks in a row and whiffed on all of them.
OldNYIfan and Saskleaf liked this.
Jul. 7, 2022 at 10:59 p.m.
#50
GenXHockey
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,156
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: Random2152
Cost less (closer to a 3rd), and is below market value (see edm), especially considering what 4 mil aav can buy us over 2 years.

People were saying it would cost us the 1st on its own or sandin to dump Petr. Let's not pretend otherwise and let this website off the hook for its ****ty takes.

This is a great trade for the leafs


No it costs a 2nd. Canes traded 26 for 39 and 50 just last draft. It's a PERFECT match comparable. I thought it would cost a 3rd but 2nd was the price.
OldNYIfan liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit