SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

Burns to DAL

Created by: Hockeyhaze83
Published: Jul. 13, 2022 at 2:31 a.m.
Salary Cap: $82,500,000
Season Days: 185/186 (99%)
Central Registry Determination: This trade has met the central registry's trade checklist

Logo of the Dallas StarsDallas Stars

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Hakanpää, JaniDallas StarsNHL-$1,491,935011---0000--
2023 2nd round pick (Logo of the Dallas StarsDAL)---010------
2024 5th round pick (Logo of the Dallas StarsDAL)---001------
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Burns, BrentSan Jose SharksNHL33%$5,331,183011---0000--
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$17,810,8341938553511
Change-$3,839,2480000-1-1
Final$13,971,586 (↓)19385534 (↓)10 (↓)000

Logo of the San Jose SharksSan Jose Sharks

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Burns, BrentSan Jose SharksNHL33%$5,331,183011---0000--
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Hakanpää, JaniDallas StarsNHL-$1,491,935011---0000--
2023 2nd round pick (Logo of the Dallas StarsDAL)---010------
2024 5th round pick (Logo of the Dallas StarsDAL)---001------
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$7,209,1662036583514
Change$3,839,248000011
Final$11,048,414 (↑)20365836 (↑)15 (↑)000
Jul. 13, 2022 at 2:39 a.m.
#1
glarson17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 8,103
Likes: 3,602
For how much San Jose is retaining, I don’t think it’s a good enough return. I would think a decent prospect would be asked for as well from San Jose
Jul. 13, 2022 at 2:48 a.m.
#2
Hockeyhaze83
Thread Starter
HockeyHaze83
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 14
Likes: 1
Was going to retain 40%. If they can clear Lebanc, 50% would even do.
Jul. 13, 2022 at 7:02 a.m.
#3
FunMustBeAlways
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 5,214
Likes: 2,867
I’d say retain 2M max if there’s no good prospect or 1st coming back. Pretty solid tho
Jul. 13, 2022 at 7:08 a.m.
#4
Hitagi_Senpai
Canucks sorta homer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 867
Anything above 25% with no first involved isn't happening, San Jose is really in the position to be greedy right now, take as much assets as you can for a piece you know a team will pay for.

I'd say Burnsy unretained that's a fair trade, maybe up to even 1m retained. But you're definitely falling short with over 2m retained "for free"
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll