SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Signings

Tampa Bay Lightning signed Anthony Cirelli (8 Years / $6,250,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Jul. 13, 2022 at 1:32 p.m.
#26
KSIxSKULLS
WentWughes
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 10,702
Likes: 10,267
Steal of a deal. Love this signing.
Jul. 13, 2022 at 1:37 p.m.
#27
Nqutilus
Jones is Underpaid
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 939
Good deal for his defensive impact, kinda like Nichushkin.
Jul. 13, 2022 at 1:37 p.m.
#28
CSStrowbridge
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 854
Quoting: Pond_Duck
I actually like the deal for the bolts. Elite defensively, good at faceoffs, good skater, could be better offensively but overall I think a good deal for a 2C


You do make great points, but this still seems like too much for a defensive-minded centre, especially for a team with so much cap trouble.
Pond_Duck liked this.
Jul. 13, 2022 at 2:00 p.m.
#29
SadSensFan14
MOVE THE COYOTES
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 4,440
Likes: 1,549
Medioker
Jul. 13, 2022 at 2:15 p.m.
#30
Pond_Duck
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 852
Quoting: CSStrowbridge
You do make great points, but this still seems like too much for a defensive-minded centre, especially for a team with so much cap trouble.

Would agree certainly a little much on the dollar front but maybe he becomes better offensively. Really with this deal it’s all just a “we’ll see” scenario.
CSStrowbridge liked this.
Jul. 13, 2022 at 2:16 p.m.
#31
CSStrowbridge
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 854
Quoting: Pond_Duck
Really with this deal it’s all just a “we’ll see” scenario.


"We'll see" on an 8-year contract is too much of a risk, in my opinion.
Pond_Duck liked this.
Jul. 13, 2022 at 2:18 p.m.
#32
Pond_Duck
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 852
Quoting: CSStrowbridge
"We'll see" on an 8-year contract is too much of a risk, in my opinion.

I mean sure but he’s still kinda young and still can get better so we don’t really know what the contract will look like, and for long extensions like this we don’t really know what it will look like.
Jul. 13, 2022 at 2:53 p.m.
#33
RKLW
Josh
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 456
Likes: 276
to much term.
Jul. 14, 2022 at 7:22 a.m.
#34
Chopper02
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 6,470
Likes: 1,982
Quoting: DoctorBreakfast
This is a much more reasonable deal than the Sergachev signing.


We can only hope Cirelli's contract ages like Couturier's second contract. If Cirelli can reach that next level that is.
Jul. 16, 2022 at 12:17 p.m.
#35
Boltsradynasty
Miss YA Killer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 3,768
Likes: 1,422
Quoting: Canesfan21_
How? They have to be trading Killorn at the very least right?
There’s no way they can sign Cernak right?


Killorn's contract expires this season so wtf would they have to trade Killorn?
Jan. 27 at 3:29 a.m.
#36
CSStrowbridge
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 854
Halfway through the first year of this contact... His offence has stagnated and his defence has gotten worse. This is a bad signing now.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit