SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trades and Free Agency

Created by: Rylee92
Team: 2022-23 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 14, 2022
Published: Jul. 14, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,750,000
2$825,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,000,000
1$1,000,000
2$2,000,000
1$750,000
Trades
1.
STL
  1. Sandin, Rasmus [RFA Rights]
  2. 2024 4th round pick (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. 2023 2nd round pick (NSH)
3.
TOR
  1. 2023 4th round pick (CBJ)
4.
TOR
    Future considerations
    5.
    VAN
    1. 2023 4th round pick (CBJ)
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2023
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the NSH
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the OTT
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    2024
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the OTT
    2025
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$82,500,000$82,155,616$212,500$0$344,384
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $950,000$950,000
    LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $11,640,250$11,640,250
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $10,903,000$10,903,000
    RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the St. Louis Blues
    $2,250,000$2,250,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $11,000,000$11,000,000
    C, LW
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $6,962,366$6,962,366
    RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,750,000$1,750,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    RW
    UFA - 1
    $825,000$825,000
    LW, RW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    RW
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $7,500,000$7,500,000
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    LD/RD
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $4,687,500$4,687,500
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $5,625,000$5,625,000
    LD
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    RD
    UFA
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,800,000$1,800,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $800,000$800,000
    LD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,400,000$1,400,000
    RD
    RFA - 2
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $850,000$850,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $750,000$750,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    $750,000$750,000
    RW, C
    UFA

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Jul. 14, 2022 at 2:55 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2019
    Posts: 3,708
    Likes: 3,130
    We just overpaid for Erik gudbranson. We’re good on right shot defenseman.
    dopplsan, benjgc, BoomerTheHero and 3 others liked this.
    Jul. 14, 2022 at 2:59 p.m.
    #2
    canucksalltheway
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2018
    Posts: 543
    Likes: 61
    Canucks are not going to trade Luke Schenn. end of story
    Especially for a 4th
    Knuckl3s liked this.
    Jul. 14, 2022 at 3:00 p.m.
    #3
    Lets Go Blues
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2016
    Posts: 6,750
    Likes: 4,320
    I would've loved to see Sandin for Barbashev before the Blues chose Leddy over Perron; at this point there are 8 NHL d-men on the roster so they would have to do some serious maneuvering.
    Chopper02 liked this.
    Jul. 14, 2022 at 3:16 p.m.
    #4
    Owly
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2018
    Posts: 4,559
    Likes: 932
    Quoting: The_Cannon
    We just overpaid for Erik gudbranson. We’re good on right shot defenseman.


    Overpaying for Gudbranson and all good on RD is about as ridiculous a statement one can make. If pylon 3rd pair RD fetch 4+ million, who wouldn't want Holl? He's absolutely better than Gudbranson and costs less than half the salary.
    Jul. 14, 2022 at 3:18 p.m.
    #5
    Owly
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2018
    Posts: 4,559
    Likes: 932
    Quoting: canucksalltheway
    Canucks are not going to trade Luke Schenn. end of story
    Especially for a 4th


    No one on the planet even sees Schenn as anything more than a 7/8 defenceman....except for Canucks fans who see him as an awesome top pair RD. It's incredible
    Jul. 14, 2022 at 3:31 p.m.
    #6
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2019
    Posts: 3,708
    Likes: 3,130
    Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
    Overpaying for Gudbranson and all good on RD is about as ridiculous a statement one can make. If pylon 3rd pair RD fetch 4+ million, who wouldn't want Holl? He's absolutely better than Gudbranson and costs less than half the salary.

    Sorry didn’t know holl was a solid top 4 option. This is an illogical conversation. We have 4 right shot defenseman right now. Peeke boqvist gudbranson and blankenburg. Where does holl fit. Plus we have no money now. So your argument is mute. I already stated we overpaid for Erik, why should we move for another 3rd pair defenseman.
    Maybe before we signed him holl there was a fit. Now, absolutely Zero fit and zero money.
    benjgc, dk325, Viqsi and 1 other person liked this.
    Jul. 14, 2022 at 5:27 p.m.
    #7
    canucksalltheway
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2018
    Posts: 543
    Likes: 61
    Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
    No one on the planet even sees Schenn as anything more than a 7/8 defenceman....except for Canucks fans who see him as an awesome top pair RD. It's incredible


    Nope, we see him as a bottom pair guy who can play 15 minutes a night
    He's exactly the type of guy the Canucks are not going to be trading. He's what embodies what Rutherford and Allvin want
    Knuckl3s liked this.
    Jul. 14, 2022 at 5:29 p.m.
    #8
    Dolzhenkov Is Coming
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2022
    Posts: 3,572
    Likes: 5,125
    There's no place for Holl and his $2 mil in Columbus. They need cap space for Laine as it is.
    Viqsi, benjgc and Konkarsson liked this.
    Jul. 14, 2022 at 5:35 p.m.
    #9
    not a he )
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2022
    Posts: 2,995
    Likes: 3,982
    Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
    Overpaying for Gudbranson and all good on RD is about as ridiculous a statement one can make. If pylon 3rd pair RD fetch 4+ million, who wouldn't want Holl? He's absolutely better than Gudbranson and costs less than half the salary.


    Cool, so trade him somewhere that didn't just sign Gudbranson. Columbus is not the fit for Holl. We don't disagree the Gudbranson signing is awful, but it is what it is.
    Viqsi and benjgc liked this.
    Jul. 14, 2022 at 6:06 p.m.
    #10
    Owly
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2018
    Posts: 4,559
    Likes: 932
    Quoting: The_Cannon
    Sorry didn’t know holl was a solid top 4 option. This is an illogical conversation. We have 4 right shot defenseman right now. Peeke boqvist gudbranson and blankenburg. Where does holl fit. Plus we have no money now. So your argument is mute. I already stated we overpaid for Erik, why should we move for another 3rd pair defenseman.
    Maybe before we signed him holl there was a fit. Now, absolutely Zero fit and zero money.


    Holl would slot ahead of everyone that isn't ahead of Gudbranson
    Jul. 14, 2022 at 6:22 p.m.
    #11
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2019
    Posts: 3,708
    Likes: 3,130
    Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
    Holl would slot ahead of everyone that isn't ahead of Gudbranson


    There’s a thing called age and roles thay players have. Boqvist is a young offensive defenseman, peeke is a young defensive defenseman and gudbranson is our physical presence on the back end. They all need ice time. No room for a 7th defenseman in holl. But tell me again what my team needs. It’s very insightful. If you were a genie and asked me to pick between holl and 2x2 and gud at 4x4 I’d call you silly and take holl. However we already have gud and are stuck with him. So let’s both quit wasting our time on this venture. It’s not gonna happen.
    benjgc, dk325 and Konkarsson liked this.
    Jul. 14, 2022 at 7:11 p.m.
    #12
    Owly
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2018
    Posts: 4,559
    Likes: 932
    Quoting: canucksalltheway
    Nope, we see him as a bottom pair guy who can play 15 minutes a night
    He's exactly the type of guy the Canucks are not going to be trading. He's what embodies what Rutherford and Allvin want


    I don't think that's a wise plan
    Jul. 14, 2022 at 7:15 p.m.
    #13
    we miss leo k
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2018
    Posts: 5,961
    Likes: 5,094
    Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
    Holl would slot ahead of everyone that isn't ahead of Gudbranson


    it still doesn't change the fact that Holl doesn't fit. Boqvist just signed his extension last week, so he's playing. Gudbranson just signed yesterday and seemingly is one of the reasons Gaudreau signed in Columbus, so he's *definitely* playing. And that leaves RD3 for Andrew Peeke, who's 6 years younger than Holl and making only $788K as opposed to Holl's $2M - so regardless of who you think the better player is, CBJ is going to defer to the cheaper, younger option for the 15 minutes a night or so they need him.
    benjgc liked this.
    Jul. 14, 2022 at 7:17 p.m.
    #14
    Owly
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2018
    Posts: 4,559
    Likes: 932
    Quoting: The_Cannon
    There’s a thing called age and roles thay players have. Boqvist is a young offensive defenseman, peeke is a young defensive defenseman and gudbranson is our physical presence on the back end. They all need ice time. No room for a 7th defenseman in holl. But tell me again what my team needs. It’s very insightful. If you were a genie and asked me to pick between holl and 2x2 and gud at 4x4 I’d call you silly and take holl. However we already have gud and are stuck with him. So let’s both quit wasting our time on this venture. It’s not gonna happen.


    You know what, that's all totally understandable. In this scenario. I am getting overly annoyed by the Holl is a cap dump nonsense belief on here. He's a good player on a great contract. The fit doesn't work here I guess, which is fine, I just am so tired of people talking like Holl sucks. He would improve your team but if this is what the GM wants then they wouldn't be looking at Holl but I absolutely know many teams will be looking for RD depth. I personally would be very happy if they keep Holl because you aren't getting a better #7 defenceman making 2 million right now.
    Friendly_Cannon liked this.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll