SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Either Hextall Values Pettersson Or They Have No One Who Wants Him

Created by: edeangel84
Team: 2022-23 Pittsburgh Penguins
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 16, 2022
Published: Jul. 16, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,250,000
Trades
PIT
  1. 2023 3rd round pick (VAN)
Additional Details:
Somewhere that needs a RHD on a valuable cap hit.
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the TOR
2024
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
2025
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$76,623,925$0$400,000$5,876,075
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,125,000$5,125,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$6,100,000$6,100,000
C
NMC
UFA - 4
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,125,000$3,125,000
RW, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,200,000$2,200,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$6,100,000$6,100,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,025,175$4,025,175
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,343,750$2,343,750
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$1,800,000$1,800,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$825,000$825,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 16, 2022 at 9:21 p.m.
#1
spoiled penguins fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 2,695
Likes: 1,487
I mean no one has really thought of this or mentioned, but if it really comes down to it; wouldn’t hurt to buy him out tbh. Free up at least SOME cap and solve our logjam. Otherwise we are only making it harder on ourselves trying to build a team with jammed cap in the lineup that we don’t want. In the end, we will find a suitor for his services though. That’s more of a last case scenario, nothing else to do type thing.
Jul. 16, 2022 at 9:21 p.m.
#2
Seiders on the Storm
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 9,890
Likes: 7,764
It's both.
Pensman69 and everyonerelax liked this.
Jul. 16, 2022 at 9:24 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 2,770
Likes: 1,090
Quoting: Pensman69
I mean no one has really thought of this or mentioned, but if it really comes down to it; wouldn’t hurt to buy him out tbh. Free up at least SOME cap and solve our logjam. Otherwise we are only making it harder on ourselves trying to build a team with jammed cap in the lineup that we don’t want. In the end, we will find a suitor for his services though. That’s more of a last case scenario, nothing else to do type thing.


He isn’t that bad tho - his analytics are actually really good and better than marinos
Pensman69 liked this.
Jul. 16, 2022 at 9:27 p.m.
#4
spoiled penguins fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 2,695
Likes: 1,487
Quoting: Hullsy09
He isn’t that bad tho - his analytics are actually really good and better than marinos


Yep, just can’t afford him anymore that’s all there is to it
Jul. 16, 2022 at 9:29 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 2,770
Likes: 1,090
Quoting: Pensman69
Yep, just can’t afford him anymore that’s all there is to it


Buying him out would be a short sighted mistake. I would rather send smith down for a year as he is waivers exempt
Jul. 16, 2022 at 9:33 p.m.
#6
I play. You?
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 565
Likes: 274
Quoting: Pensman69
Yep, just can’t afford him anymore that’s all there is to it


Can always throw these guys in as sweeteners

fc1kr5O_d.webp?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium

knr1e2Q_d.webp?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium
Jul. 16, 2022 at 9:44 p.m.
#7
MisstheWhalers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 23,627
Likes: 12,353
Just send Smith down and have POJ on the 3rd D pair with Ruuta, that'd be the smart way to go about it.
Pensman69 liked this.
Jul. 16, 2022 at 9:45 p.m.
#8
PittsburghModelMyAss
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,363
Likes: 1,405
Quoting: Hullsy09
He isn’t that bad tho - his analytics are actually really good and better than marinos


and how do they stack up compared to Mathesons
Jul. 16, 2022 at 9:53 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 2,770
Likes: 1,090
Quoting: BigBadBurke
and how do they stack up compared to Mathesons


Pettersson>Matheson>Marino, per Andy and Rono on Twitter (and a lot of other models I have seen).

https://twitter.com/arhockeystats/status/1547604451384471552?s=21&t=GFVj5Y275hwgfMpJ4pns5Q

https://twitter.com/arhockeystats/status/1548409500599607296?s=21&t=GFVj5Y275hwgfMpJ4pns5Q
BigBadBurke liked this.
Jul. 16, 2022 at 9:55 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,771
Likes: 8,828
If i had a nickel for every conversation with a Pens fan trying to convince them of his lack of trade value because of his contract…🤷🏻‍♂️
Jul. 16, 2022 at 9:58 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 2,770
Likes: 1,090
Quoting: BURGHgirl
Can always throw these guys in as sweeteners

fc1kr5O_d.webp?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium

knr1e2Q_d.webp?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium


Quoting: BURGHgirl
Can always throw these guys in as sweeteners

fc1kr5O_d.webp?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium

knr1e2Q_d.webp?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium


https://twitter.com/byronmbader/status/1548451481501634564?s=21&t=GFVj5Y275hwgfMpJ4pns5Q

Before last year smith had a 98% chance at becoming a solid NHLer and a 91% chance at becoming a star with player comps which included Niedermayer and Coffey.

Yes he had a poor year last year but he was also playing on a bad, poorly coached team on a pairing with the corpse of PK Subban. In the right situation he could flourish.

As for poehling he was also a high pick and Corey Pronman said he is looking like a bottom 6 player with a dwindling chance at becoming more which I agree with. Not a bad toss in for a trade
Jul. 16, 2022 at 11:09 p.m.
#12
I play. You?
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 565
Likes: 274
Quoting: Hullsy09
https://twitter.com/byronmbader/status/1548451481501634564?s=21&t=GFVj5Y275hwgfMpJ4pns5Q

Before last year smith had a 98% chance at becoming a solid NHLer and a 91% chance at becoming a star with player comps which included Niedermayer and Coffey.

Yes he had a poor year last year but he was also playing on a bad, poorly coached team on a pairing with the corpse of PK Subban. In the right situation he could flourish.

As for poehling he was also a high pick and Corey Pronman said he is looking like a bottom 6 player with a dwindling chance at becoming more which I agree with. Not a bad toss in for a trade


Watch Smith play. He is horrible in his own end. Can't defend the slot or the point to save his life. He is an offense first guy whose transition game is lousy because he hesitates and ends up coughing the puck up. He is also undersized and doesn't keep his blade on the ice, often looking lost in his own zone. He should be in WBS. There are too many glaring holes he needs to fix if he has any hope of turning it around. Projecting as a star is a joke. This kid developed bad habits and sloppy play because he was not properly developed.
Poehling is just plain bad. Turnover machine who can't transition and loses the puck by trying to do to much. Not a strong puck carrier at all. He's too stiff and can only carry the puck directly in front of him.
Smith may be able to improve, but I'm not optimistic if he stays in the NHL. Poehling will be lucky to make the roster. Both need to play in WBS
Jul. 16, 2022 at 11:15 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 2,770
Likes: 1,090
Quoting: BURGHgirl
Watch Smith play. He is horrible in his own end. Can't defend the slot or the point to save his life. He is an offense first guy whose transition game is lousy because he hesitates and ends up coughing the puck up. He is also undersized and doesn't keep his blade on the ice, often looking lost in his own zone. He should be in WBS. There are too many glaring holes he needs to fix if he has any hope of turning it around. Projecting as a star is a joke. This kid developed bad habits and sloppy play because he was not properly developed.
Poehling is just plain bad. Turnover machine who can't transition and loses the puck by trying to do to much. Not a strong puck carrier at all. He's too stiff and can only carry the puck directly in front of him.
Smith may be able to improve, but I'm not optimistic if he stays in the NHL. Poehling will be lucky to make the roster. Both need to play in WBS


I never claimed to be some Ty Smith expert. All I was doing is saying based on this model, before this season there was a 91% chance of him becoming a star. “Projecting as a star is a joke” is unfair to say because the model is probably more accurate then your eye test
Jul. 16, 2022 at 11:27 p.m.
#14
I play. You?
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 565
Likes: 274
Quoting: Hullsy09
I never claimed to be some Ty Smith expert. All I was doing is saying based on this model, before this season there was a 91% chance of him becoming a star. “Projecting as a star is a joke” is unfair to say because the model is probably more accurate then your eye test


Trust me, it's not. Seeing a player is the only true way to evaluate them
Jul. 16, 2022 at 11:34 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 2,770
Likes: 1,090
Quoting: BURGHgirl
Trust me, it's not. Seeing a player is the only true way to evaluate them


How many Jersey games you watch this year?
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll