SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Navigating Tight Cap Situations

Created by: Fairness_For_All
Team: 2022-23 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 16, 2022
Published: Jul. 17, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
VAN
  1. Muzzin, Jake
  2. 2024 4th round pick (TOR)
Additional Details:
Toronto adds slightly to help offset cap difference.
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2024
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
2025
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$82,500,000$81,068,116$212,500$0$1,431,884
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$950,000$950,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$762,500$762,500
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,950,000$4,950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$7,500,000$7,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,687,500$4,687,500
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,400,000$1,400,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,800,000$1,800,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 17, 2022 at 8:20 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,913
Likes: 6,406
no
majormoose007, westleysnipez, audiodave and 3 others liked this.
Jul. 17, 2022 at 8:21 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 1,539
What is this? How about Matthews for Pearson? Canucks don't think twice about declining Garland for Muzzin
majormoose007, audiodave, The_Rocket and 2 others liked this.
Jul. 17, 2022 at 8:31 p.m.
#3
MajorMoose
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 3,428
Likes: 2,603
Canucks counter with Myers for Nylander
audiodave, The_Rocket and Knuckl3s liked this.
Jul. 17, 2022 at 8:31 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 49
Likes: 18
New strategy? Garland on the 6th line and 5 dman at all times??
Juiceman liked this.
Jul. 17, 2022 at 8:32 p.m.
#5
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: canucksfan43
What is this? How about Matthews for Pearson? Canucks don't think twice about declining Garland for Muzzin


The Leafs don't need a more expensive Kerfoot. They already have Kerfoot
canucksfan43 liked this.
Jul. 17, 2022 at 8:32 p.m.
#6
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
This is no way helps the Leafs cap hit
Jul. 17, 2022 at 8:35 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2016
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 1,228
Why would the Canucks even consider this?
The_Rocket, theleano1, Juiceman and 2 others liked this.
Jul. 17, 2022 at 8:56 p.m.
#8
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 7,190
Likes: 3,654
Canucks decline Muzzin is old and injury prone; garland is one of their best 5v5 scorers and is shined to a good contract.

If Canucks trade garland for a D-man they would look for one with similar AAV, Term, and Age. Muzzin is none of those
Juiceman, NYR1983, majormoose007 and 1 other person liked this.
Jul. 17, 2022 at 9:07 p.m.
#9
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,618
Likes: 17,643
How about we do Demko for Murray while we are at it?


Either you don’t know who Garland is, or you simply put no effort into this ACGM. Disgraceful
Jul. 17, 2022 at 9:08 p.m.
#10
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,618
Likes: 17,643
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
This is no way helps the Leafs cap hit


You get the better player and save a tiny bit of cap space. You can’t seriously think of declining this
NYR1983, mv21227, TheAlien and 3 others liked this.
Jul. 17, 2022 at 9:27 p.m.
#11
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: Juiceman
You get the better player and save a tiny bit of cap space. You can’t seriously think of declining this


Garland is a depth forward not at all needed by TO and obviously is a contract Vancouver knows is bad since they are trading him every day. Muzzin is a top 4, physical defenceman who still is an excellent shutdown defenceman. I would much rather have that then Garland. He is not not worth his contract
Jul. 17, 2022 at 9:31 p.m.
#12
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,618
Likes: 17,643
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Garland is a depth forward not at all needed by TO and obviously is a contract Vancouver knows is bad since they are trading him every day. Muzzin is a top 4, physical defenceman who still is an excellent shutdown defenceman. I would much rather have that then Garland. He is not not worth his contract


Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Garland is a depth forward not at all needed by TO and obviously is a contract Vancouver knows is bad since they are trading him every day. Muzzin is a top 4, physical defenceman who still is an excellent shutdown defenceman. I would much rather have that then Garland. He is not not worth his contract


“Depth forward”

Yikes bro, this is why nobody takes you seriously. Next thing you’re going to tell me is that Demko is a backup goalie
majormoose007, theleano1, Knuckl3s and 1 other person liked this.
Jul. 17, 2022 at 9:48 p.m.
#13
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: Juiceman
“Depth forward”

Yikes bro, this is why nobody takes you seriously. Next thing you’re going to tell me is that Demko is a backup goalie


The number of forwards the Leafs have that are better than him is numerous. He makes too much for what he does. The Leafs don't need to waste the cap space. Bunting, Nylander, Marner, Matthews and JT are all better. Kerfoot is just as good and makes 1.5 less. That's the entire top 6 covered. We don't need or want Garland. Send him anywhere else
Jul. 17, 2022 at 10:36 p.m.
#14
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 7,190
Likes: 3,654
Quoting: Juiceman
“Depth forward”

Yikes bro, this is why nobody takes you seriously. Next thing you’re going to tell me is that Demko is a backup goalie


Just ignore this guy. He thinks Kerfoot is better than garland
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll