SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tarasenko

Created by: Chigurrhh
Team: 2022-23 Pittsburgh Penguins
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 20, 2022
Published: Jul. 20, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Helping St Louis clear space for reasons.
Free Agent Signings
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,000,000
Trades
1.
STL
  1. 2023 2nd round pick (PIT)
2.
PIT
ARI
  1. Blueger, Teddy
  2. McGinn, Brock
  3. 2023 3rd round pick (NJD)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the TOR
2024
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
2025
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$82,500,000$73,210,592$0$0$9,289,408
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$6,100,000$6,100,000
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,125,000$5,125,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,125,000$3,125,000
RW, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$750,000$750,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C, LW
UFA
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,343,750$2,343,750
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,025,175$4,025,175
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$6,100,000$6,100,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$1,800,000$1,800,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$825,000$825,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 20, 2022 at 5:35 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 2,769
Likes: 1,089
Yeah tarasenko gets a bit more than that
PhysicalGraffiti and Knuckl3s liked this.
Jul. 20, 2022 at 5:35 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Chiggy
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 590
Quoting: Hullsy09
Yeah tarasenko gets a bit more than that


Not if his team is desperately trying to clear cap space and everyone knows it. See Paccioretty.
Jul. 20, 2022 at 5:36 p.m.
#3
MassToSoCal
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 176
Likes: 36
That’ll cost you a 1st I’m sure
Jul. 20, 2022 at 5:37 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Chiggy
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 590
Quoting: PhysicalGraffiti
That’ll cost you a 1st I’m sure


Not for a cap dump. Carolina got Paccioretty for free for that reason. If they are getting Tkachuk, they have little leverage
Jul. 20, 2022 at 5:46 p.m.
#5
MassToSoCal
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 176
Likes: 36
Quoting: Chigurrhh
Not for a cap dump. Carolina got Paccioretty for free for that reason. If they are getting Tkachuk, they have little leverage


A player who just scored 91 points isn’t a cap dump. That’s crazy and they can move him to a team with a ton of space like Anaheim, who can retain 50% and move him to another team for a 1st
Capitalfail67 liked this.
Jul. 20, 2022 at 5:46 p.m.
#6
Caps fan idk why
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2016
Posts: 11,236
Likes: 4,344
Quoting: Chigurrhh
Not for a cap dump. Carolina got Paccioretty for free for that reason. If they are getting Tkachuk, they have little leverage


Quoting: Chigurrhh
Not if his team is desperately trying to clear cap space and everyone knows it. See Paccioretty.


"See Paccioretty" sooo i see you offered a 2nd.. which means you agree he has value and that you are willing to pay for him. Carolina gave up nothing you are giving up a 2nd? imo Tara gets a 1st or 2nd + prospect
PhysicalGraffiti liked this.
Jul. 20, 2022 at 5:48 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Chiggy
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 590
Quoting: Capitalfail67
"See Paccioretty" sooo i see you offered a 2nd.. which means you agree he has value and that you are willing to pay for him. Carolina gave up nothing you are giving up a 2nd? imo Tara gets a 1st or 2nd + prospect


He doesn’t get that much as an expiring player on a team trying to clear cap space. That’s not how it works. That’s deadline value with retained salary.

Having value doesn’t mean he has high value. What kind of logic is “you think he has value so he must be worth a first?” Hilarious.
Jul. 20, 2022 at 5:50 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Chiggy
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 590
Quoting: PhysicalGraffiti
A player who just scored 91 points isn’t a cap dump. That’s crazy and they can move him to a team with a ton of space like Anaheim, who can retain 50% and move him to another team for a 1st



Of course a productive player can be a cap dump. What are you taking about?. Again, Paccioretty was Vegas’s best forward last year. And he was given away for free. Think about it for more than 5 seconds.
Jul. 20, 2022 at 5:56 p.m.
#9
Caps fan idk why
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2016
Posts: 11,236
Likes: 4,344
Quoting: Chigurrhh
He doesn’t get that much as an expiring player on a team trying to clear cap space. That’s not how it works. That’s deadline value with retained salary.

Having value doesn’t mean he has high value. What kind of logic is “you think he has value so he must be worth a first?” Hilarious.


you called him a cap dump lol then proceed to give up a 2nd for him. He just had 82p in 75 games only thing that is "Hilarious" is the limited amount of thinking it took for you to make this assumption. Penguins dont have cap space to waste either so logically they cant afford him or his cap. 21 player roster w 200k.
Jul. 20, 2022 at 5:59 p.m.
#10
MassToSoCal
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 176
Likes: 36
Quoting: Chigurrhh
Of course a productive player can be a cap dump. What are you taking about?. Again, Paccioretty was Vegas’s best forward last year. And he was given away for free. Think about it for more than 5 seconds.


Explain how this is the same situation? That’s right it’s not. They can send him to Anaheim for a 2nd. They can retain 50% and get a 1st plus a prospect for a year of Tarasenko from a team that wants to contend for a cup
Capitalfail67 liked this.
Jul. 20, 2022 at 6:00 p.m.
#11
Caps fan idk why
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2016
Posts: 11,236
Likes: 4,344
Quoting: Chigurrhh
Of course a productive player can be a cap dump. What are you taking about?. Again, Paccioretty was Vegas’s best forward last year. And he was given away for free. Think about it for more than 5 seconds.


Paccioretty was moved bc Vegas had zero cap space... Blue dont need to trade for MT and probably will move Tara in a trade for him so he can be flipped for assets.. lol they more than likely wont give away a ppg+ player for free... AGAIN CAP DUMPS ARE NORMALLY A PLAYER YOU PAY TO GET RID OF.... you are clearly paying for him
PhysicalGraffiti liked this.
Jul. 20, 2022 at 6:01 p.m.
#12
Caps fan idk why
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2016
Posts: 11,236
Likes: 4,344
Quoting: PhysicalGraffiti
Explain how this is the same situation? That’s right it’s not. They can send him to Anaheim for a 2nd. They can retain 50% and get a 1st plus a prospect for a year of Tarasenko from a team that wants to contend for a cup


he lacks the mental capacity to understand Vegas HAD to trade him to be cap compliant...Blues can easily just move him in a trade for MT
PhysicalGraffiti liked this.
Jul. 20, 2022 at 6:01 p.m.
#13
MassToSoCal
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 176
Likes: 36
Quoting: Capitalfail67
Paccioretty was moved bc Vegas had zero cap space... Blue dont need to trade for MT and probably will move Tara in a trade for him so he can be flipped for assets.. lol they more than likely wont give away a ppg+ player for free... AGAIN CAP DUMPS ARE NORMALLY A PLAYER YOU PAY TO GET RID OF.... you are clearly paying for him


This is getting to the point of talking to a wall… and probably a wall with crappy wall paper from the 60s
Jul. 20, 2022 at 6:08 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Chiggy
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 590
Quoting: PhysicalGraffiti
This is getting to the point of talking to a wall… and probably a wall with crappy wall paper from the 60s



It is. Neither of you understand the concept or leverage or the fact that cap dumps can be done while still getting value back (you have to be really stupid not to grasp that).

Last week, the Penguins traded Marino in a cap dump to New Jersey. They still got value back. It’s still a cap dump. Don’t be intentionally stupid. Pretending not to understand a basic concept doesn’t help your argument.
Jul. 20, 2022 at 6:10 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Chiggy
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 590
Quoting: Capitalfail67
Paccioretty was moved bc Vegas had zero cap space... Blue dont need to trade for MT and probably will move Tara in a trade for him so he can be flipped for assets.. lol they more than likely wont give away a ppg+ player for free... AGAIN CAP DUMPS ARE NORMALLY A PLAYER YOU PAY TO GET RID OF.... you are clearly paying for him


John Marino was traded as cap dump last week and his team still got back value. That’s how it usually works in this league. What are talking about? It’s like you don’t understand that players can have value while getting dumped to clear cap space. It’s baffling.

I’ll spell it out for you: Teams get less back in return for players when they are trying to clear cap space and everyone knows it. It’s not hard to grasp.
Jul. 20, 2022 at 6:41 p.m.
#16
MassToSoCal
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 176
Likes: 36
Quoting: Chigurrhh
It is. Neither of you understand the concept or leverage or the fact that cap dumps can be done while still getting value back (you have to be really stupid not to grasp that).

Last week, the Penguins traded Marino in a cap dump to New Jersey. They still got value back. It’s still a cap dump. Don’t be intentionally stupid. Pretending not to understand a basic concept doesn’t help your argument.


That’s not what a cap dump is at all champ.
Jul. 21, 2022 at 2:07 a.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Chiggy
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 590
Quoting: PhysicalGraffiti
That’s not what a cap dump is at all champ.


The Marino trade was done so the team had enough cap space for Petry. Stop pretending not to understand it. These kinds of transactions happen regularly and teams get value but not full value on players they are trading away.

Few things annoy me more than someone understanding something but pretending not to just to be irritating. Stop it.
Jul. 21, 2022 at 1:35 p.m.
#18
Caps fan idk why
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2016
Posts: 11,236
Likes: 4,344
Quoting: Chigurrhh
John Marino was traded as cap dump last week and his team still got back value. That’s how it usually works in this league. What are talking about? It’s like you don’t understand that players can have value while getting dumped to clear cap space. It’s baffling.

I’ll spell it out for you: Teams get less back in return for players when they are trying to clear cap space and everyone knows it. It’s not hard to grasp.


Explain? Marino replacement on RS is more expensive. LMFAO what a terrible take. Penguins move Marino bc they thought they were getting a younger player with more upside... they also are changing the D hence trading Matheson.

TML are over the cap they should probably trade Nylander for a 3rd? thats your logic. moving great players for nothing right? good talk
Jul. 21, 2022 at 6:24 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Chiggy
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 590
Quoting: Capitalfail67
Explain? Marino replacement on RS is more expensive. LMFAO what a terrible take. Penguins move Marino bc they thought they were getting a younger player with more upside... they also are changing the D hence trading Matheson.

TML are over the cap they should probably trade Nylander for a 3rd? thats your logic. moving great players for nothing right? good talk


…you genuinely don’t understand that Marino was moved to clear cap space for Petry (who was more expensive than Matheson)? I’m sorry, man. I thought you were just pretending not to understand.

Tarasenko has requested a trade from St. Louis and is an expiring contract that is logical to move to make room for Tkachuk. How is that in any way comparable to Nylander? Lol. This is pathetic.
Jul. 23, 2022 at 12:39 p.m.
#20
Caps fan idk why
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2016
Posts: 11,236
Likes: 4,344
Edited Jul. 23, 2022 at 3:01 p.m.
Quoting: Chigurrhh
…you genuinely don’t understand that Marino was moved to clear cap space for Petry (who was more expensive than Matheson)? I’m sorry, man. I thought you were just pretending not to understand.

Tarasenko has requested a trade from St. Louis and is an expiring contract that is logical to move to make room for Tkachuk. How is that in any way comparable to Nylander? Lol. This is pathetic.


Petry cost more money than MARINO ... idk how you arent understanding its pretty easy. BOTH ARE RSD. Yes clearing cap to add an worse older player who makes more money is intelligent.

lmfao now how dumb does your logic look for the BLUES to just give away Tera?


Petry had 107 giveaways last year...and only 17 takeaways....
Jul. 23, 2022 at 9:35 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Chiggy
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 590
Quoting: Capitalfail67
Petry cost more money than MARINO ... idk how you arent understanding its pretty easy. BOTH ARE RSD. Yes clearing cap to add an worse older player who makes more money is intelligent.

lmfao now how dumb does your logic look for the BLUES to just give away Tera?


Petry had 107 giveaways last year...and only 17 takeaways....


The point is that you genuinely don’t understand that when teams are trying to clear cap space, they get less in return for players they trade away to make I happen?

It’s a really simple concept. The Penguins needed to clear cap space, they got little value for Marino. In this scenario, it would have been the Blues doing that to make room for another trade. This happens all the time.

Columbus just did this with Bjorkstrand and Seattle. They got very little in return for a very good player because of the cap crunch.

Quit embarrassing yourself. It’s not hard. You are just being stubborn and refusing to understand how teams lose value when trying to clear cap space.
Jul. 25, 2022 at 12:27 p.m.
#22
Caps fan idk why
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2016
Posts: 11,236
Likes: 4,344
Quoting: Chigurrhh
The point is that you genuinely don’t understand that when teams are trying to clear cap space, they get less in return for players they trade away to make I happen?

It’s a really simple concept. The Penguins needed to clear cap space, they got little value for Marino. In this scenario, it would have been the Blues doing that to make room for another trade. This happens all the time.

Columbus just did this with Bjorkstrand and Seattle. They got very little in return for a very good player because of the cap crunch.

Quit embarrassing yourself. It’s not hard. You are just being stubborn and refusing to understand how teams lose value when trying to clear cap space.


"Columbus just did this with Bjorkstrand and Seattle. They got very little in return for a very good player because of the cap crunch." AGAIN TEAMS THAT ARE IN CAP CRUNCHES DO THIS... BLues arent in a cap crunch and the OB deal is one of the worst deals of this offseason. SO you suggest the Blues also make a terrible move? great plan
Jul. 26, 2022 at 8:27 a.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Chiggy
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 590
Quoting: Capitalfail67
"Columbus just did this with Bjorkstrand and Seattle. They got very little in return for a very good player because of the cap crunch." AGAIN TEAMS THAT ARE IN CAP CRUNCHES DO THIS... BLues arent in a cap crunch and the OB deal is one of the worst deals of this offseason. SO you suggest the Blues also make a terrible move? great plan


....The whole point of this was a theoretical Tkachuk trade to St Louis that would cause a cap crunch lol. Well done.
Jul. 27, 2022 at 3:11 p.m.
#24
Caps fan idk why
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2016
Posts: 11,236
Likes: 4,344
Quoting: Chigurrhh
....The whole point of this was a theoretical Tkachuk trade to St Louis that would cause a cap crunch lol. Well done.


LMFAO you lack the mental capacity to properly understand why this is dumb... They would have just traded Tara to Cal like Fla did w Weegar and Hub? lol
Jul. 27, 2022 at 8:43 p.m.
#25
Thread Starter
Chiggy
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 590
Quoting: Capitalfail67
LMFAO you lack the mental capacity to properly understand why this is dumb... They would have just traded Tara to Cal like Fla did w Weegar and Hub? lol


Jordan Kyrou would have been the one going to Calgary in a St Louis deal. And then they still would have had to clear cap space. Sorry you didn't get that.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll