SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Carter Alomar Blue Jays Style Shakeup

Created by: MSchlotz
Team: 2022-23 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 22, 2022
Published: Jul. 22, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$9,750,000
1$1,900,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$800,000
3$2,700,000
2$2,100,000
Trades
1.
2.
TOR
  1. 2023 3rd round pick (NSH)
3.
WPG
  1. Holl, Justin
  2. 2023 3rd round pick (NSH)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2024
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
2025
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$80,224,283$212,500$0$2,275,717

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$950,000$950,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 2
$9,750,000$9,750,000
RW
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
$2,700,000$2,700,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
$2,100,000$2,100,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C
UFA - 1
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,687,500$4,687,500
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$7,500,000$7,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,800,000$1,800,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,400,000$1,400,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,900,000$1,900,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$796,667$796,667
LW, RW
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 22, 2022 at 11:47 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,579
Likes: 14,386
Calgary obviously doesn't do that, neither does tavares
Jul. 22, 2022 at 11:48 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 903
Lindholm has been as good if not better than Tavres for a couple years now and is doing it for less than half of Tavares salary. Marner and Tkachuk could be a wash at this point. This package severely favours the Leafs.
Jul. 22, 2022 at 11:48 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 4,297
Likes: 1,328
Terrible for CGY
Jul. 22, 2022 at 11:49 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 39
Likes: 1
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Calgary obviously doesn't do that, neither does tavares


Just saw it suggested on Twitter.

Calgary gets the best player in the deal by quite a margin but takes on Tavares contract in the process. Obviously Tavares may not waive.
vr1995 liked this.
Jul. 22, 2022 at 11:49 a.m.
#5
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 5,265
Likes: 2,154
Quoting: yycofred
Lindholm has been as good if not better than Tavres for a couple years now and is doing it for less than half of Tavares salary. Marner and Tkachuk could be a wash at this point. This package severely favours the Leafs.


but its not a wash, because marner is better
MSchlotz liked this.
Jul. 22, 2022 at 11:49 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 39
Likes: 1
Quoting: yycofred
Lindholm has been as good if not better than Tavres for a couple years now and is doing it for less than half of Tavares salary. Marner and Tkachuk could be a wash at this point. This package severely favours the Leafs.


Marner - Tkachuk isn't even close to a wash. Very far from it.
Jul. 22, 2022 at 11:51 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,579
Likes: 14,386
Quoting: MSchlotz
Just saw it suggested on Twitter.

Calgary gets the best player in the deal by quite a margin but takes on Tavares contract in the process. Obviously Tavares may not waive.


Tkachuk is the best player in the deal.

Lindholm at 4.8 million is miles better than Tavares at 11 million and is 4 years younger.

Marner also has much less term than tkachuk would be getting.

Tkachuk is also 2 years younger and making a million less a year here than marner

It's bad
Jul. 22, 2022 at 11:54 a.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 39
Likes: 1
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Tkachuk is the best player in the deal.

Lindholm at 4.8 million is miles better than Tavares at 11 million and is 4 years younger.

Marner also has much less term than tkachuk would be getting.

It's God awful


Tkachuk better than Marner? What planet are you on? It's not even close.

Lindholm miles better? Lindholm has 183 pts in 203 games in his last 3 seasons.

Tavares has 186 in 192 games. I understand being younger and cheaper but you can't argue miles better with stats like that. I would accept a wash at best on those two.
Jul. 22, 2022 at 11:57 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 903
Quoting: vr1995
but its not a wash, because marner is better


Quoting: MSchlotz
Marner - Tkachuk isn't even close to a wash. Very far from it.


https://frozenpool.dobbersports.com/frozenpool_compare.php?players%5B%5D=4169&players%5B%5D=4276&period=2021-2022%3AR%3A99

Really interesting comparison of this season and the last three showing that Marner and Tkachuk are nearly identical, Tkachuk is doing similar things in less ice time and not playing with the second best player in the world. Tkachuk even had better extended numbers last season compared to the analytical darling that is Marner.
Jul. 22, 2022 at 11:57 a.m.
#10
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 5,265
Likes: 2,154
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Tkachuk is the best player in the deal.

Lindholm at 4.8 million is miles better than Tavares at 11 million and is 4 years younger.

Marner also has much less term than tkachuk would be getting.

Tkachuk is also 2 years younger and making a million less a year here than marner

It's bad


please explain how tkachuk is better than marner
MSchlotz liked this.
Jul. 22, 2022 at 11:59 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,579
Likes: 14,386
Quoting: vr1995
please explain how tkachuk is better than marner


Guy above my quoted post summed it up.

I also added that he's 2 years younger and less expensive than marner.

Funny that everyone saying marner is better is a Leafs fan. I'm not a fan of either team
Jul. 22, 2022 at 11:59 a.m.
#12
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 5,265
Likes: 2,154
Quoting: yycofred
https://frozenpool.dobbersports.com/frozenpool_compare.php?players%5B%5D=4169&players%5B%5D=4276&period=2021-2022%3AR%3A99

Really interesting comparison of this season and the last three showing that Marner and Tkachuk are nearly identical, Tkachuk is doing similar things in less ice time and not playing with the second best player in the world. Tkachuk even had better extended numbers last season compared to the analytical darling that is Marner.


marner has a better ppg is better defensively and is an unreal penalty killer, now take a look at their playoff numbers, tkachuk is "gritty" so people think he is a playoff god but decide not to look at the numbers, marner is better, i dont think its a debate
MSchlotz liked this.
Jul. 22, 2022 at 12:00 p.m.
#13
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 5,265
Likes: 2,154
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Guy above my quoted post summed it up.

I also added that he's 2 years younger and less expensive than marner.


theyre the same age lmfao so youre wrong and tkachuk will want marner money, do you try and do research? age one is terrible, quick go back and edit it so you dont look bad
MSchlotz liked this.
Jul. 22, 2022 at 12:00 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,579
Likes: 14,386
Quoting: MSchlotz
Tkachuk better than Marner? What planet are you on? It's not even close.

Lindholm miles better? Lindholm has 183 pts in 203 games in his last 3 seasons.

Tavares has 186 in 192 games. I understand being younger and cheaper but you can't argue miles better with stats like that. I would accept a wash at best on those two.


MUCH younger and MUCH cheaper and better.

If Calgary is blowing up their team why would they get more expensive, older and worse? It's completely nonsensical
Jul. 22, 2022 at 12:02 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 39
Likes: 1
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
MUCH younger and MUCH cheaper and better.

If Calgary is blowing up their team why would they get more expensive, older and worse? It's completely nonsensical


Lol completely disregards any stats........"MUCH better"

Makes sense
Jul. 22, 2022 at 12:04 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,579
Likes: 14,386
Quoting: MSchlotz
Lol completely disregards any stats........"MUCH better"

Makes sense


You only use points. And even then you don't win the argument
Jul. 22, 2022 at 12:05 p.m.
#17
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 5,265
Likes: 2,154
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
You only use points. And even then you don't win the argument


you just tried to say tkachuk is 2 years younger than marner, you cant be calling anyone out
MSchlotz liked this.
Jul. 22, 2022 at 12:07 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 39
Likes: 1
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
You only use points. And even then you don't win the argument


Not looking to win the "argument" on a scenario that I just reposted from Twitter for discussion but you enjoy your little soapbox lol
Jul. 22, 2022 at 12:07 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,579
Likes: 14,386
Quoting: vr1995
theyre the same age lmfao so youre wrong and tkachuk will want marner money, do you try and do research? age one is terrible, quick go back and edit it so you dont look bad


The AGM has him a million dollars less. I don't think he will sign for marner money, and if he does I doubt it will be for shorter term like marner did.

I am comfortable stating that tkachuk is a better player than marner, whether I made an age error or not. I mistakenly thought marner was in 2014 draft for a minute.

I also think tkachuks stats improve in Toronto and marners would lower in Calgary.
yycofred liked this.
Jul. 22, 2022 at 12:07 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 903
Quoting: vr1995
marner has a better ppg is better defensively and is an unreal penalty killer, now take a look at their playoff numbers, tkachuk is "gritty" so people think he is a playoff god but decide not to look at the numbers, marner is better, i dont think its a debate


So as shown in the direct comparison Tkachuk has a better points/60 than Marner over the last three seasons, Tkachuk is doing the same if not more in terms of production with three and a half minutes less in ice time per game than Marner. Tkachuk had better possession metrics last season and nearly identical relative metrics. Penalty killing and playoffs sure, Marner has been better and Tkachuk doesn't kill penalties, sounds like Marner should stay in Toronto then and this post unnecessary.
Jul. 22, 2022 at 12:08 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,579
Likes: 14,386
Quoting: vr1995
you just tried to say tkachuk is 2 years younger than marner, you cant be calling anyone out


I guess I should die because I forgot marners draft year for 2 minutes. You really got me. It's easy to spot someone with no argument when they hyper focus on a minor unimportant error
Jul. 22, 2022 at 12:11 p.m.
#22
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 5,265
Likes: 2,154
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
The AGM has him a million dollars less. I don't think he will sign for marner money, and if he does I doubt it will be for shorter term like marner did.

I am comfortable stating that tkachuk is a better player than marner, whether I made an age error or not. I mistakenly thought marner was in 2014 draft for a minute.

I also think tkachuks stats improve in Toronto and marners would lower in Calgary.


but the AGM isnt what hes signing for, he turned down 11m a year the diffeernce between their contracts will be 500k which is nothing, but you used tkachuk being 2 years younger as a reason why hes better, you ve yet to give an actual reason as to why tkachuks better, marner is a better defender, penalty killer, has better production in both the regular season and the playoffs, tkachuk is grittier big whoop
Jul. 22, 2022 at 12:12 p.m.
#23
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 5,265
Likes: 2,154
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
I guess I should die because I forgot marners draft year for 2 minutes. You really got me. It's easy to spot someone with no argument when they hyper focus on a minor unimportant error


youve yet to make an actual valid argument lmao, youre one argument is wrong and your other is hypothetical ahaha
Jul. 22, 2022 at 12:14 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,217
Likes: 19,490
Quoting: MSchlotz
Just saw it suggested on Twitter.

Calgary gets the best player in the deal by quite a margin but takes on Tavares contract in the process. Obviously Tavares may not waive.


Lmao

Sir your bias is showing.
Jul. 22, 2022 at 12:17 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 98
Likes: 16
Calgary would absolutely consider this trade. You guys need to remember that like literally every other offer Calgary is going to get for Tkachuk -- who just requested a trade, mind you -- will be all futures.

If Calgary wants to stay competitive, this is one of, if not the only serious offer they will receive. Obviously its not a slam dunk for them as they will get older and take on a lot of cap. But its an offer they would absolutely take a long look at.

IMO the real issue is getting Tavares to waive his NMC. That's a lot to ask for mr. leafs pyjamas. Maybe another first round implosion and I could see it
MSchlotz liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll