Forums/Armchair-GM

Bigger better defense

Created by: Hockey_Mind
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 26, 2022
Published: Jul. 26, 2022
Team: 2022-23 Columbus Blue Jackets
Team Explanation
I had a dream
Trades
1.
CBJ
  1. Tanev, Christopher
  2. Zadorov, Nikita
CGY
  1. Nyquist, Gustav
  2. Boqvist, Adam
  3. Bean, Jake
Buyouts
  • Alexander Wennberg: $441,667
DRAFT YEARROUND 1ROUND 2ROUND 3ROUND 4ROUND 5ROUND 6ROUND 7
2023
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
2024
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
2025
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$78,712,500$0$2,200,000$3,787,500
Left WingCenterRight Wing
Logo of the CBJ
Gaudreau, Johnny
$9,750,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the CBJ
Johnson, Kent
$925,000
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the CBJ
Laine, Patrik
$8,700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the CBJ
Marchenko, Kirill
$925,000
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the CBJ
Sillinger, Cole
$925,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the CBJ
Voracek, Jakub
$8,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the CBJ
Jenner, Boone
$3,750,000
C, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the CBJ
Roslovic, Jack
$4,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the CBJ
Texier, Alexandre
$1,525,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the CBJ
Robinson, Eric
$1,600,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the CBJ
Kuraly, Sean
$2,500,000
C, LW
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the CBJ
Danforth, Justin
$975,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the CBJ
Werenski, Zachary
$9,583,333
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the CGY
Tanev, Christopher
$4,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the CBJ
Merzlikins, Elvis
$5,400,000
G
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the CBJ
Gavrikov, Vladislav
$2,800,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the CBJ
Peeke, Andrew
$787,500
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the CBJ
Korpisalo, Joonas
$1,300,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the CGY
Zadorov, Nikita
$3,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the CBJ
Gudbranson, Erik
$4,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 4
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the CBJ
Bayreuther, Gavin
$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the CBJ
Blankenburg, Nick
$825,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the CBJ
Olivier, Mathieu
$750,000
RW
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 26 at 11:45 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 2,815
Likes: 2,160
I know they worked really well together in Calgary I just want nothing to do with zadorov. We have that role filled with our human fist gudbranson
Jul. 26 at 11:48 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Be formless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 332
Quoting: The_Cannon
I know they worked really well together in Calgary I just want nothing to do with zadorov. We have that role filled with our human fist gudbranson


I’ve always liked Zadorovs game and attitude on the ice. I don’t think you can have enough guys like that, especially when you’ve got Gaudreau and Laine up front.
Konkarsson liked this.
Jul. 26 at 12:18 p.m.
#3
CbjSabresDucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 4,269
Likes: 1,954
I'd love Tanev, however I'd try to find a way to take Boqv and Zadorov out.


Werenski - Tanev

Gavvy - Boqv

Blankenburg/Gudbranson - Peeke


Would be so good
Hockey_Mind liked this.
Jul. 26 at 12:23 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Be formless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 332
Quoting: Bdawwwgy1
I'd love Tanev, however I'd try to find a way to take Boqv and Zadorov out.


Werenski - Tanev

Gavvy - Boqv

Blankenburg/Gudbranson - Peeke


Would be so good


I think if you take our Boq out you would have to add in Peeke. They would want a young RHD back.
Jul. 26 at 12:30 p.m.
#5
Buljujarvi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 4,172
Likes: 2,494
our defense has so much depth id rather not add more D especially since we'll have to trade ceulemens as it is already
Jul. 26 at 12:40 p.m.
#6
CbjSabresDucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 4,269
Likes: 1,954
Quoting: Hockey_Mind
I think if you take our Boq out you would have to add in Peeke. They would want a young RHD back.


I'd absolutely do that. I like Peeke but Tanev is pretty much his ceiling
Hockey_Mind liked this.
Jul. 26 at 12:50 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Be formless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 332
Quoting: ConnorMcHellebucyk
our defense has so much depth id rather not add more D especially since we'll have to trade ceulemens as it is already


The trade is not adding defensemen. It’s sending out two young guys for two more veteran guys. 2-2=0. No one is trading Culemans unless there is a some ungodly offer made. He and Jiricek will likely supplant Boqvist and/or Peeke in 2 years time, so Peeke/Boq are the more likely pieces to be moved. Better to do it now than after they lose their roster spot.
Jul. 26 at 8:13 p.m.
#8
Victim of Rule 6.14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 544
Likes: 325
Doubt Calgary would take this. They are high on Tanev and missing him was a crucial loss to them vs Edmonton
Hockey_Mind liked this.
Jul. 26 at 9:23 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Be formless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 332
Quoting: AndrewPawlack
Doubt Calgary would take this. They are high on Tanev and missing him was a crucial loss to them vs Edmonton


Which is why I want him. Things have changed a lot in Calgary since the loss to Edmonton, so maybe they’re ready to swap him for younger pieces?
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll