SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

opening night

Created by: BenningTruther
Team: 2022-23 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 29, 2022
Published: Jul. 29, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
seems like Allvin and JR will not be able to reshape the blue line this offseason. i would expect them to be active in deals leading into the trade deadline but this is likely how we start
Free Agent Signings
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$950,000
Trades
VAN
  1. 2023 3rd round pick (ANA)
Additional Details:
anywhere
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2024
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2025
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$78,239,167$1,250,000$2,000,000$4,260,833

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,350,000$7,350,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,750,000$4,750,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,650,000$6,650,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,950,000$4,950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$825,000$825,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,260,000$7,260,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$762,500$762,500
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,650,000$2,650,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
$950,000$950,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 29, 2022 at 2:54 p.m.
#1
alwaysnextyear
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 5,521
Likes: 1,566
At this point Pearson won't return anything IMO. There's still some half-decent free agent wingers available for cheap, so despite the fact Pearson is a useful player on-ice, his contract won't be attractive now that most teams have spent their money. I could see a team giving up a pick for him at the deadline though.
GiggywithGibby liked this.
Jul. 29, 2022 at 2:56 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 716
Likes: 221
Quoting: alwaysnextyear
At this point Pearson won't return anything IMO. There's still some half-decent free agent wingers available for cheap, so despite the fact Pearson is a useful player on-ice, his contract won't be attractive now that most teams have spent their money. I could see a team giving up a pick for him at the deadline though.


fair, i think one body needs to be moved out of the top 9 and pearson seems like the guy for me. if they got a third for hamonic anything is possible lmao
alwaysnextyear liked this.
Jul. 29, 2022 at 2:58 p.m.
#3
alwaysnextyear
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 5,521
Likes: 1,566
Quoting: BenningTruther
fair, i think one body needs to be moved out of the top 9 and pearson seems like the guy for me. if they got a third for hamonic anything is possible lmao


Yeah, it's not impossible. I think they fleeced OTT for Hamonic because he's a RHD and apparently Pierre McGuire liked him, haha.
Jul. 29, 2022 at 3:00 p.m.
#4
alwaysnextyear
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 5,521
Likes: 1,566
Quoting: alwaysnextyear
Yeah, it's not impossible. I think they fleeced OTT for Hamonic because he's a RHD and apparently Pierre McGuire liked him, haha.


And I agree a forward needs to go, but they might as well get value for a more valuable asset. Miller is the obvious choice because of his contract situation and talent, Garland is next, then possibly Hoglander if he were able to return a young RHD or C on an ELC.
Jul. 29, 2022 at 3:02 p.m.
#5
1-0 them
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 3,260
Likes: 2,075
Zar is signing in NJnod
Jul. 29, 2022 at 3:14 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 716
Likes: 221
Quoting: BlackwoodForVezina
Zar is signing in NJnod


no he has property of JR branded on his back
Jul. 29, 2022 at 3:16 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 716
Likes: 221
Quoting: alwaysnextyear
And I agree a forward needs to go, but they might as well get value for a more valuable asset. Miller is the obvious choice because of his contract situation and talent, Garland is next, then possibly Hoglander if he were able to return a young RHD or C on an ELC.


i dont think miller gets dealt before the season starts but if he isnt gonna resign you defenitly have to move him, i think it would be a mistake to move either of garland or hogs unless someone overpays and you get back a premier young RHD
alwaysnextyear liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll