SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What do ducks fans think

Created by: mauston_atthews
Team: 2022-23 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 29, 2022
Published: Jul. 29, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
ANA
  1. Holl, Justin
  2. Muzzin, Jake
  3. 2023 3rd round pick (OTT)
  4. 2023 3rd round pick (TOR)
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2024
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2025
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$58,320,417$0$4,200,000$24,179,583
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,037,500$2,037,500
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,456,250$1,456,250
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,650,000$3,650,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,800,000$1,800,000
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,295,000$1,295,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$425,000$425,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$762,500$762,500
C, RW
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 29, 2022 at 3:54 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 9,487
Likes: 4,166
Muzzin to Anaheim makes sense for both teams. But I don't see Muzzin Waiving.
Jul. 29, 2022 at 3:56 p.m.
#2
alwaysnextyear
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 1,566
Interesting move for both teams really. TOR gets some serious cap relief this year and next, but ANA weaponizes their cap space to upgrade and add picks. Nice idea.
Jul. 29, 2022 at 3:57 p.m.
#3
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,773
Likes: 6,541
I like the two 2023 thirds, Muzzin will likely be a good chaperone for Drysdale.

Fowler and Klinberg can be our PP QBs with Drysdale as the third option getting picked from time to time to get his reps in.

Don't like Vaak getting pushed out, he needs the reps too, but with an injury or sending Holl on holiday for a week, can get his time on the ice too.

It leaves us with a pretty bad hole at right D for next season, and complicates the matters with our near NHL ready kids who all play left D for reasons unknown, but maybe we can flip one or both Muzzin Holl at the deadline with retention to solve that issue and find a veteran RD next off-season when half the league is a free agent.

I'd probably take it, but I'm addicted to 2023 2nd round picks. I'd also love to find a way to pry Robertson from Torontos grasp, him and McTavish on a line in a year or twos time would be so good to watch.
Jul. 29, 2022 at 4:04 p.m.
#4
Matthew Hendrickson
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 43
Likes: 16
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
I like the two 2023 thirds, Muzzin will likely be a good chaperone for Drysdale.

Fowler and Klinberg can be our PP QBs with Drysdale as the third option getting picked from time to time to get his reps in.

Don't like Vaak getting pushed out, he needs the reps too, but with an injury or sending Holl on holiday for a week, can get his time on the ice too.

It leaves us with a pretty bad hole at right D for next season, and complicates the matters with our near NHL ready kids who all play left D for reasons unknown, but maybe we can flip one or both Muzzin Holl at the deadline with retention to solve that issue and find a veteran RD next off-season when half the league is a free agent.

I'd probably take it, but I'm addicted to 2023 2nd round picks. I'd also love to find a way to pry Robertson from Torontos grasp, him and McTavish on a line in a year or twos time would be so good to watch.


Shattenkirk will also be a FA after this year so he makes sense to me in a trade, maybe including salary retention on him is the difference between getting 2 3rds and getting a 2023 2nd back instead.
Jul. 29, 2022 at 4:09 p.m.
#5
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,773
Likes: 6,541
Quoting: mhendrickson61
Shattenkirk will also be a FA after this year so he makes sense to me in a trade, maybe including salary retention on him is the difference between getting 2 3rds and getting a 2023 2nd back instead.


Toronto doesn't have their 2023 2nd. I might go riskier, Pick swap, Toronto 2023 1st and Ducks 2023 2nd going back the other way, get Shattenkirk on 50% retention, leaving Toronto with 5 million in cap space to do something with, half of which gets used to resign Sandin, the other half can be used at the deadline. Maybe Toronto needs a slight sweetener to the deal, a 4th round pick in 2023 or a depth player thrown back the other way with retention as well.
Jul. 29, 2022 at 4:56 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 724
Verbeek said he wanted to add one more defenseman via free agency (now done). There's no reason to think he'll turn around and bring in two more in a trade.
Jul. 29, 2022 at 5:32 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,554
Likes: 1,592
Ok
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
I like the two 2023 thirds, Muzzin will likely be a good chaperone for Drysdale.

Fowler and Klinberg can be our PP QBs with Drysdale as the third option getting picked from time to time to get his reps in.

Don't like Vaak getting pushed out, he needs the reps too, but with an injury or sending Holl on holiday for a week, can get his time on the ice too.

It leaves us with a pretty bad hole at right D for next season, and complicates the matters with our near NHL ready kids who all play left D for reasons unknown, but maybe we can flip one or both Muzzin Holl at the deadline with retention to solve that issue and find a veteran RD next off-season when half the league is a free agent.

I'd probably take it, but I'm addicted to 2023 2nd round picks. I'd also love to find a way to pry Robertson from Torontos grasp, him and McTavish on a line in a year or twos time would be so good to watch.


I agree that there would be some nice pieces TOR could offer that would be more desirable, but this is pretty fair value wise and I think makes a lot of sense for both teams. Vaak wouldn’t get pushed out, just down to the third line where he belongs. Ducks would have a competent defense with this that would still allow for ice time that Drys and Vaak need to develop:

Fowler - Klingberg
Muzzin - Drysdale
Vaakanainen - Holl
GiggywithGibby liked this.
Jul. 29, 2022 at 5:43 p.m.
#8
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,773
Likes: 6,541
Yep, you're right, I got my R/L mixed up for a second. We are going to have a huge hole at RD next offseason anyway, but I guess we will address that in F/A or the draft.

I still desperately want another 2023 1st though, and I would love to put some strong talent into our LW pool.

As stated above, I would take the deal as is, the base structure is fair, but I would love to know what kind of options open up if we offer retention.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll