SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Signings

New Jersey Devils signed Jesper Bratt (1 Year / $5,450,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Aug. 3, 2022 at 10:02 a.m.
#1
Jesper Bratt has signed a new contract with the New Jersey Devils.
Standard Contract
Comparable ContractsCOMPARE THIS CONTRACT
SIGNED BY: Tom Fitzgerald
Length: 1 year
Value: $5,450,000
Expiry Status: RFA (Arb)
Cap % Tooltip: 6.61
Signing Team: Logo of the New Jersey DevilsNew Jersey Devils
Signing Date: Aug. 3, 2022
Source: CapFriendly

Jesper Bratt signed a 1 year, $5,450,000 contract with the New Jersey Devils on Aug. 3, 2022. The contract has a cap hit of $5,450,000.

SEASONClauseCap HitTooltipAAV TooltipP. BonusesTooltipS. BonusesTooltipBase SalaryTooltipTotal SalaryTooltipMinors SalTooltip
2022-23$5,450,000$5,450,000$0$0$5,450,000$5,450,000$5,450,000
TOTAL$5,450,000$5,450,000$0$0$5,450,000$5,450,000$5,450,000
Qualifying OfferTooltip: $5,450,000
Arbitration Requested Icon ARBITRATION: This contract was signed following an arbitration filing
Aug. 3, 2022 at 10:03 a.m.
#2
feelsbadman
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 131
Likes: 88
Bratt Pack is to blame for this tears of joy
Aug. 3, 2022 at 10:04 a.m.
#3
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 9,207
Likes: 5,572
Edited Aug. 3, 2022 at 6:16 p.m.
This is not the kind of player you bridge.
Woof that is going to bite NJ in the ass

Edit: just to be clear, I think that this is a bad contract as a result and voted no
Civil_Eng_PE, zk97, Faulk_my_Dzingel and 16 others liked this.
Aug. 3, 2022 at 10:09 a.m.
#4
1-0 them
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 3,259
Likes: 2,074
meh
Aug. 3, 2022 at 10:10 a.m.
#5
Yegor bomb
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 782
Likes: 947
Aug. 3, 2022 at 10:11 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 686
Likely will be traded next season.
Faulk_my_Dzingel liked this.
Aug. 3, 2022 at 10:13 a.m.
#7
Speak of the Devil
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 23,934
Likes: 26,433
JBITBPITNHL
Tintin and Chabot4C liked this.
Aug. 3, 2022 at 10:14 a.m.
#8
Smythe.over.Hart
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 3,035
Likes: 2,350
Hmmm. To me this guy just became huge trade bait.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Aug. 3, 2022 at 10:15 a.m.
#9
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 10,059
Likes: 12,817
Palat > Bratt is a choice
Aug. 3, 2022 at 10:28 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,380
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: Random2152
This is not the kind of player you bridge.
Woof that is going to bite NJ in the ass


We shall see. He just had a career year and must have wanted to be paid at term for a big chunk more. My guess is 8+ mil mark as a ppg winger.

He went from

His first 5 seasons were 0.47, 0.65, 0.53, 0.65 ppg. Then he jumped last year to 0.96 ppg.

So they want him to prove that was skill and development.

That being said you're right there is risk. Not a bridge, but marners camp offered the leafs 9 mil*8 years before his contract year. As we know when he then had 94 pts, he ended up with about 10.5 mil *6 years.

So they're gambling alright
python3504 and OldNYIfan liked this.
Aug. 3, 2022 at 10:28 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,380
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: Civil_Eng_PE


Holy ****
Civil_Eng_PE liked this.
Aug. 3, 2022 at 10:48 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 39,916
Likes: 18,285
The contract itself is fine.

But we are going to regret not offering him a long-term deal ($6.5 million to $7.25 million).
This does allow him to prove up his ability.
But will also make him more expensive next year to lock up long-term ($7.25 million to $8 million)
And, based on track record of recent Arb filers, about half stay with team after 2-years.
Aug. 3, 2022 at 10:51 a.m.
#13
torontos finest
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 9,557
Likes: 11,185
definetely a gamble on the devils part not to secure him long term in the 5-6 mil range. if he regresses you're only looking at saving yourself 500k, if he repeats his previous season than that's gonna be 8 million and over.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Aug. 3, 2022 at 11:02 a.m.
#14
feelsbadman
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 131
Likes: 88
Quoting: NHLfan10506
The contract itself is fine.

But we are going to regret not offering him a long-term deal ($6.5 million to $7.25 million).
This does allow him to prove up his ability.
But will also make him more expensive next year to lock up long-term ($7.25 million to $8 million)
And, based on track record of recent Arb filers, about half stay with team after 2-years.


They were apparently offered a deal similar to Nico's and rejected it
Aug. 3, 2022 at 11:03 a.m.
#15
Farewell
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 3,060
Likes: 5,225
Quoting: NHLfan10506
The contract itself is fine.

But we are going to regret not offering him a long-term deal ($6.5 million to $7.25 million).
This does allow him to prove up his ability.
But will also make him more expensive next year to lock up long-term ($7.25 million to $8 million)
And, based on track record of recent Arb filers, about half stay with team after 2-years.


Precisely. It's not a bad contract (and it's definitely very good value for a player of Bratt's caliber), but if he does wind up having another PPG pace season, he's going to need to get PAID (at least $7.5 million AAV, for at least 7 years). Fitzgerald has to know that.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Aug. 3, 2022 at 11:32 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 39,916
Likes: 18,285
Quoting: hugeballer
They were apparently offered a deal similar to Nico's and rejected it


I believe Nico's contract (7 x $7.25m) was Bratt's ask.
Devils offer was $6.5m...maybe it had gone up. That was around the draft.
Aug. 3, 2022 at 11:36 a.m.
#17
Hakuna Matata
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 33,617
Likes: 20,848
Yeah this aint great

Reminds me of the Fiala deal that in the end got him traded

Wonder if the same thing happens as if NJ didnt want to commit to Bratt long term that might not sit well with him
Aug. 3, 2022 at 11:36 a.m.
#18
Farewell
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 3,060
Likes: 5,225




And he got $5.45, so they basically split the difference.
Aug. 3, 2022 at 11:37 a.m.
#19
to be banned soon
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 568
Likes: 541
good to know we're still tanking
Aug. 3, 2022 at 12:14 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 686
I never understand why people always vote these kind of deals as good. The 1 year Fiala deal was majority good. The 1 year Reinhart deal was majority good. The Buchnevich deal was majority good. These kind of deals really mess with the player-organization relationship. It's not good at all.
majormoose007 liked this.
Aug. 3, 2022 at 12:28 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 39,916
Likes: 18,285
Fiala 2021 and Bratt 2022

Similarities

1. Fiala: Team filing: $4m, Player filing: $6.25m, (eventual deal: 1 year x $5.1 million)
2. Bratt: Team filing: $4.15m, Player filing: $6.5m, (eventual deal: 1 year x $5.45 million)


Differences:

1. Cap situation is very different as Minnesota just bought out Parise and Suter. Devils have an estimate $20 million coming off books next year.

2. Minnesota was coming off a season where they had 3rd oldest lineup, Devils are coming off a season where they had youngest roster.

3. Bratt is a bit ahead of Fiala at similar points in their careers. Side-by-side below. But Bratt appears 2-years ahead of Fiala, so NJD should be more willing to make the long-term investment at an earlier point in their careers. Its just going to be more expensive next year.

If anything Minnesota's reluctance is more justified. NJD should have had more incentive to lock up Bratt and didn't.


----

Through D+4 season
Fiala: 140 GP, 35g, 30a, 65pts (0.46 ppg)
Bratt: 185 GP, 37g, 63a, 100pts (0.54 ppg)

Through D+5 season
Fiala: 223 GP, 48g, 56a, 104pts (0.47 ppg)
Bratt: 231 GP, 44g, 86a, 130pts (0.56 ppg)

Through D+6 season
Fiala: 287 GP, 71g, 87a, 158pts (0.55 ppg)
Bratt: 307 GP, 70g, 133a, 203pts (0.66 ppg)

Through D+7 season
Fiala: 337 GP, 91g, 107a, 198pts (0.59 ppg)
Bratt: [2022-23 season]

Through D+8 season
Fiala: 419 GP, 124g, 159a, 283pts (0.68 ppg)
Bratt [2023-24 season]
OldNYIfan and Devil liked this.
Aug. 3, 2022 at 12:30 p.m.
#22
Catch me in corners
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 13
Likes: 8
Tough for 1 year - should've looked to avoid arbitration and just sign at 6x6 or something similar.

High likelihood of putting up another solid year as he grows with the team.

Still RFA at the end of the deal. Allows NJ to reassess as they have a handful of pieces expiring too.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Aug. 3, 2022 at 12:35 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 12,707
Likes: 17,332
Good deal but Devils going to need to do this again next year which is the biggest concern
Aug. 3, 2022 at 1:12 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 1,479
Likes: 451
Quoting: CapFriendly
Jesper Bratt has signed a new contract with the New Jersey Devils.


I think they made a good bet, worst case they have to pay him his actual value if he happens to do this again, but scoring was way up all over the league. what might happen is he regresses back to his .6 points a game and they can sign him cheaper than they would have this season. its a gamble but i think a good one.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Aug. 3, 2022 at 2:10 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 5,012
Likes: 3,523
Quoting: DongLord23
I never understand why people always vote these kind of deals as good. The 1 year Fiala deal was majority good. The 1 year Reinhart deal was majority good. The Buchnevich deal was majority good. These kind of deals really mess with the player-organization relationship. It's not good at all.


Because all they look at is the AAV relative to points. This contract is definitely not good for the Devils.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit