SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Not difficult

Created by: Caniac555
Team: 2022-23 Carolina Hurricanes
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 4, 2022
Published: Aug. 4, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Edited with special teams
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$3,000,000
Trades
CAR
  1. 2023 4th round pick (ARI)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CAR
2024
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
2025
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$82,354,417$112,500$500,000$145,583

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$7,750,000$7,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$8,460,250$8,460,250
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,400,000$5,400,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,820,000$4,820,000
C
UFA - 8
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$925,000$925,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$6,000,000$6,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$1,800,000$1,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,300,000$5,300,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,500,000$4,500,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,025,000$4,025,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,050,000$4,050,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$762,500$762,500
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$762,500$762,500
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$762,500$762,500
RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 4, 2022 at 6:12 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 3,616
Likes: 3,044
The difficult part might be getting Necas to agree to 3M. But that’s it
Aug. 4, 2022 at 6:13 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3,601
He can agree to it or sit out…Canes could be playing hardball with him. He’d be smart to take 3m x 2 and get right.

Quoting: Canesfan21_
The difficult part might be getting Necas to agree to 3M. But that’s it
Aug. 4, 2022 at 6:44 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 804
Likes: 253
The fact that you think it’s that simple is ridiculous. Be as is not signing that. You don’t just play hardball with a guy that deserves a mil more at the least. He also isn’t settling for fourth line minutes. The yotes aren’t taking that. It’s clear they wanna be as bad as possible. If they wanted an Ethan bear, they could’ve got a player like him in FA without giving anything up. It’s a flat cap world. It’s not that simple
Aug. 4, 2022 at 7:02 p.m.
#4
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 8,631
Likes: 3,470
It’s been reported that the Canes and Necas are getting close on a deal at about 3mil x 2 years. So that contract isn’t all out of the realm of possibility.

As for the Bear trade, a team will probably pay a 2nd or 3rd rounder for Bear. It won’t be Arizona, but a team looking for RD, like the Canucks.
Caniac555 liked this.
Aug. 4, 2022 at 7:11 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 532
Call me crazy, but I don’t think the Canes signed Bear to trade him. I think he’s insurance at this point in case Burns falters/gets injured or for the 3rd pair as he’s easily the most experienced out of Chatfield and Coghlan and he already knows the Canes’ system. Defenseman seem to take longer to adjust.

Now, trading Bear mid-season, if Coghlan and Chatfield show well, sure, I could see, but I don’t see him going anywhere in the immediate future.
vikhodush liked this.
Aug. 4, 2022 at 8:31 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3,601
I’d be willing to put money he’s traded. He was signed to avoid Arb and get a know cap amount. 2.2m is a palatable price for a RFA RHD who will maintain RFA status. Too bad it won’t be for the Canes…

Quoting: spockrock
Call me crazy, but I don’t think the Canes signed Bear to trade him. I think he’s insurance at this point in case Burns falters/gets injured or for the 3rd pair as he’s easily the most experienced out of Chatfield and Coghlan and he already knows the Canes’ system. Defenseman seem to take longer to adjust.

Now, trading Bear mid-season, if Coghlan and Chatfield show well, sure, I could see, but I don’t see him going anywhere in the immediate future.
Aug. 4, 2022 at 8:45 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 5,032
Quoting: spockrock
Call me crazy, but I don’t think the Canes signed Bear to trade him. I think he’s insurance at this point in case Burns falters/gets injured or for the 3rd pair as he’s easily the most experienced out of Chatfield and Coghlan and he already knows the Canes’ system. Defenseman seem to take longer to adjust.

Now, trading Bear mid-season, if Coghlan and Chatfield show well, sure, I could see, but I don’t see him going anywhere in the immediate future.


Burns gets injured... he's not missed a game since 2014. Reliability shouldn't be a worry with him. Plus, if you want another powerplay quarterback, I don't know where they could find one. Oh hey look, there's a slightly use Jake Gardiner!
Aug. 4, 2022 at 9:11 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 532
Quoting: Caniac555
I’d be willing to put money he’s traded. He was signed to avoid Arb and get a know cap amount. 2.2m is a palatable price for a RFA RHD who will maintain RFA status. Too bad it won’t be for the Canes…


Quoting: Caniac2000
Burns gets injured... he's not missed a game since 2014. Reliability shouldn't be a worry with him. Plus, if you want another powerplay quarterback, I don't know where they could find one. Oh hey look, there's a slightly use Jake Gardiner!


Don’t see it. They’re going to need some experience on that 3rd pair. Bionic Gardiner and Chatfield/Coghlan ain’t it, at least not yet.
Aug. 4, 2022 at 9:15 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 5,032
Quoting: spockrock
Don’t see it. They’re going to need some experience on that 3rd pair. Bionic Gardiner and Chatfield/Coghlan ain’t it, at least not yet.


Gardiner brings experience. He's played in many playoff games against Boston and... well he played in many playoff games!

Being serious, people forget how good Gardiner is when he's healthy. He's not Hamilton, but he'll be a good point producing 2nd pairing D man. Is he what he used to be? That is yet to be seen. And while he's not special defensively, there are far worse players in the league in their own end than Gardiner. Analytically, he is (was?) replacement level defensively. His offense and play driving far outweights his defensive mishaps. I really want to see him with this Canes offense with how it is set out.
Aug. 4, 2022 at 9:24 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 532
Quoting: Caniac2000
Gardiner brings experience. He's played in many playoff games against Boston and... well he played in many playoff games!

Being serious, people forget how good Gardiner is when he's healthy. He's not Hamilton, but he'll be a good point producing 2nd pairing D man. Is he what he used to be? That is yet to be seen. And while he's not special defensively, there are far worse players in the league in their own end than Gardiner. Analytically, he is (was?) replacement level defensively. His offense and play driving far outweights his defensive mishaps. I really want to see him with this Canes offense with how it is set out.


He’s over a year removed from playing competitive hockey and he’s another year past 30. Just don’t see him playing again, especially not in Raleigh.
Aug. 4, 2022 at 9:31 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 5,032
Quoting: spockrock
He’s over a year removed from playing competitive hockey and he’s another year past 30. Just don’t see him playing again, especially not in Raleigh.


He's playing in the Minnesotan summer league. He's playing hockey, and while it's not ultra-competitive, the likes of Brady Skjei, Justin Faulk, and Derek Stepan all play in it too. We know from experience none of those guys like to lose, so it will have a competitive aspect. It's already been made very clear he's playing again, with a M-NTC (anti-canada clause) it may be hard to move him to another team. If it was going to be that easy, they would have done it by now. Look at when they dumped De Haan in Chicago. He'll play again and in Raleigh
Aug. 4, 2022 at 9:33 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 532
Quoting: Caniac2000
He's playing in the Minnesotan summer league. He's playing hockey, and while it's not ultra-competitive, the likes of Brady Skjei, Justin Faulk, and Derek Stepan all play in it too. We know from experience none of those guys like to lose, so it will have a competitive aspect. It's already been made very clear he's playing again, with a M-NTC (anti-canada clause) it may be hard to move him to another team. If it was going to be that easy, they would have done it by now. Look at when they dumped De Haan in Chicago. He'll play again and in Raleigh


I’ll bet that he’s a UFA 48hrs or less after August 9th.
Aug. 4, 2022 at 9:40 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 5,032
Quoting: spockrock
I’ll bet that he’s a UFA 48hrs or less after August 9th.


Seeing as he's not buyout eligible, I'll take that bet
Aug. 4, 2022 at 9:42 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 532
Quoting: Caniac2000
Seeing as he's not buyout eligible, I'll take that bet


If he’s been “medically cleared to play” and was on the reserve list as of last years trade deadline, he’s very eligible to be bought out.
Aug. 4, 2022 at 9:45 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 5,032
Quoting: spockrock
If he’s been “medically cleared to play” and was on the reserve list as of last years trade deadline, he’s very eligible to be bought out.


Friedman addressed this in a 32 thoughts episode before the draft, Gardiner cannot be boughtout. He could be terminated, but you would need him to agree to that, and he won't.
Aug. 4, 2022 at 9:53 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 532
Quoting: Caniac2000
Friedman addressed this in a 32 thoughts episode before the draft, Gardiner cannot be boughtout. He could be terminated, but you would need him to agree to that, and he won't.


Not really buying that without a direct link or quote specific to Gardiner, but whatevs. The 2nd buyout window is different than the 1st.

Waddell made it a point just today to talk about a buyout only being available to for a player making more than. $4M.

“ Reaching a settlement with Lajoie would allow the Hurricanes a contract buyout window, Waddell said. He did not say if the team would use the buyout, but it could be used to free up cap space. “A buyout window is only for a player who makes more than $4 million,” Waddell said. “But if we don’t do anything, we’re going to be fine. It will be tight but we’ll be fine.”

Read more at: https://www.newsobserver.com/sports/nhl/carolina-hurricanes/article264181531.html#storylink=cpy

I don’t think he’d be mentioning that if buying out Gardiner weren’t a possibility. DeCock also wouldn’t be mentioning it as well were it not possible.
Aug. 4, 2022 at 9:59 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 5,032
Quoting: spockrock
Not really buying that without a direct link or quote specific to Gardiner, but whatevs. The 2nd buyout window is different than the 1st.

Waddell made it a point just today to talk about a buyout only being available to for a player making more than. $4M.

“ Reaching a settlement with Lajoie would allow the Hurricanes a contract buyout window, Waddell said. He did not say if the team would use the buyout, but it could be used to free up cap space. “A buyout window is only for a player who makes more than $4 million,” Waddell said. “But if we don’t do anything, we’re going to be fine. It will be tight but we’ll be fine.”

Read more at: https://www.newsobserver.com/sports/nhl/carolina-hurricanes/article264181531.html#storylink=cpy

I don’t think he’d be mentioning that if buying out Gardiner weren’t a possibility. DeCock also wouldn’t be mentioning it as well were it not possible.


https://twitter.com/CardiacCane/status/1555370863754608640

Yes, it is Cardiac Cane, but if the infortmation here is coming from PuckPedia, it's viable. Gardiner won't be buyout eligible without doing his year end medical. Fair assumption he hasn't done it yet seeing as he hasn't been in Raleigh since the Tampa series.
Aug. 4, 2022 at 10:05 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 532
Quoting: Caniac2000
https://twitter.com/CardiacCane/status/1555370863754608640

Yes, it is Cardiac Cane, but if the infortmation here is coming from PuckPedia, it's viable. Gardiner won't be buyout eligible without doing his year end medical. Fair assumption he hasn't done it yet seeing as he hasn't been in Raleigh since the Tampa series.


Uhm…I thought you said Friedman said it.

Excuse me if I don’t take that as credible, like at all.
Aug. 4, 2022 at 10:14 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 5,032
Quoting: spockrock
Uhm…I thought you said Friedman said it.

Excuse me if I don’t take that as credible, like at all.


Friedman did say it, but if you expect me to go through every 32 thoughts podcast until I find the exact quote, you're insane. If Puckpedia is saying he's not buyout eligible, he's not buyout eligible. If you want to live in denial, sure. But that is good enough for me.
Aug. 4, 2022 at 10:17 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 532
Quoting: Caniac2000
Friedman did say it, but if you expect me to go through every 32 thoughts podcast until I find the exact quote, you're insane. If Puckpedia is saying he's not buyout eligible, he's not buyout eligible. If you want to live in denial, sure. But that is good enough for me.


You do you
Caniac2000 liked this.
Aug. 4, 2022 at 10:21 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,694
Likes: 3,362
Quoting: evelutions2
It’s been reported that the Canes and Necas are getting close on a deal at about 3mil x 2 years. So that contract isn’t all out of the realm of possibility.

As for the Bear trade, a team will probably pay a 2nd or 3rd rounder for Bear. It won’t be Arizona, but a team looking for RD, like the Canucks.


Have seen a couple times on here ppl referencing rumors around Necas getting close to a deal. Where are you seeing that? Not questioning, just haven’t seen anything myself yet but haven’t been poking around much today. Would be happy if they could figure it out sooner rather than later.
Aug. 4, 2022 at 10:23 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,694
Likes: 3,362
Quoting: Erkadurk347
The fact that you think it’s that simple is ridiculous. Be as is not signing that. You don’t just play hardball with a guy that deserves a mil more at the least. He also isn’t settling for fourth line minutes. The yotes aren’t taking that. It’s clear they wanna be as bad as possible. If they wanted an Ethan bear, they could’ve got a player like him in FA without giving anything up. It’s a flat cap world. It’s not that simple

Deserved based on what? I thought maybe a bridge deal around 3.5 would be fair but based on recent comps after a disappointing year I don’t think 2x3 is a slap in the face at all. I’m a big Necas fan and hope they can figure it out because I’d hate to see him move elsewhere and explode (a la lindholm) but I don’t think he’s earned a big deal yet.
Aug. 4, 2022 at 10:37 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 532
Edited Aug. 4, 2022 at 10:57 p.m.. Reason: See post below
Dupe
Aug. 4, 2022 at 10:56 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 532
Quoting: Caniac2000
Friedman did say it, but if you expect me to go through every 32 thoughts podcast until I find the exact quote, you're insane. If Puckpedia is saying he's not buyout eligible, he's not buyout eligible. If you want to live in denial, sure. But that is good enough for me.


And look up how they handled James Wisniewski…

He was placed on injured reserve after just one game, never came off, bought out that summer…just sayin…

https://sportsforecaster.com/nhl/p/12291/James_Wisniewski

2016-06-30

Contract bought out by the Carolina Hurricanes.
2016-04-09

Missed the last 81 regular season games (torn acl).
2015-10-11

Torn ACL, injured reserve.
2015-10-09

Torn ACL, sidelined indefinitely.
Aug. 4, 2022 at 11:22 p.m.
#25
Thread Starter
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3,601
https://www.newsobserver.com/sports/nhl/carolina-hurricanes/article264181531.html

Quoting: vikhodush
Have seen a couple times on here ppl referencing rumors around Necas getting close to a deal. Where are you seeing that? Not questioning, just haven’t seen anything myself yet but haven’t been poking around much today. Would be happy if they could figure it out sooner rather than later.
vikhodush liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll