SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Staying Competitive 2023-24

Created by: cMac73
Team: 2023-24 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 5, 2022
Published: Aug. 5, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Bergeron and Krejci retire. Reilly is gone 2022 or 2023 for cap relief to any team for a low pick. Grzelcyk is traded for more cap along with Studnicka for a decent young center in Rasmussen and a pick. Forbort goes to Florida who will need a defensive defenseman. Ullmark goes to Minnesota who needs a goalie. We get Merrill for some defensive depth, Jost for some younger forward depth, and a 2nd round pick. Signing Miller as the top line center to replace Bergeron. Having a younger cheaper option play 2c in Zacha. Letting the bottom six be filled with younger guys/prospects. Replacing Grzelcyk with Orlov who should be better in the playoffs. Signing Schenn for more depth. With very little cap space, we can bring a goalie up from Providence, or sign a veteran for cheap.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$3,250,000
3$1,500,000
3$4,000,000
1$2,000,000
2$775,000
2$900,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$9,500,000
2$4,750,000
2$900,000
6$8,000,000
Trades
1.
BOS
  1. 2024 4th round pick (ANA)
ANA
  1. Reilly, Mike
Additional Details:
Most likely traded in 2022
Any team
2.
3.
BOS
  1. Jost, Tyson [RFA Rights]
  2. Merrill, Jon
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (MIN)
4.
BOS
  1. 2024 4th round pick (FLA)
FLA
  1. Forbort, Derek
  2. 2024 3rd round pick (BOS)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the LAK
2024
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the DET
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2025
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$82,500,000$86,210,833$4,500,000$0-$3,710,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,250,000$3,250,000
C, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RW
UFA - 8
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$863,333$863,333
RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$1,460,000$1,460,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$900,000$900,000
C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
NTC, NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,000,000$4,000,000
G
RFA - 1
$4,750,000$4,750,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$775,000$775,000
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,137,500$1,137,500
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$900,000$900,000
RD
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 5, 2022 at 10:33 a.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 27
Likes: 8
Minnesota isn't taking on long term G contract when they have wallstedt. They are also in cap hell and aren't the team to dump your bad contract on
MNBassman liked this.
Aug. 5, 2022 at 10:50 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Sway4Vezina
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2021
Posts: 809
Likes: 361
I see what you mean it’s just in this scenario we need to get cap space so I guess another team who needs a good 1a/1b goalie could get him. I just saw that Minnesota had a few useful pieces for us.
Aug. 5, 2022 at 10:52 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,769
Likes: 8,826
Edited Aug. 5, 2022 at 11:21 a.m.
Quoting: ErikO
Minnesota isn't taking on long term G contract when they have wallstedt. They are also in cap hell and aren't the team to dump your bad contract on


Agree Minny is not taking Ullmark. Disagree that he’s a bad contract.

Amongst qualifying goalies last year was 12th in sv%, 9th in GAA, 12th in GSAA.

Also 3 years is not long term for a top 20 goalie that has not hit 30 yet.

Minny is just not in position to do it.
Aug. 5, 2022 at 11:21 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,393
Likes: 8,047
I don't mind the Detroit trade as a Detroit fan. I like Grezlcyk but don't like losing Rasmussen but feel he is replaceable. Jersey fans say Zacha at centre is a bad idea but that's up to you. Depending on Detroit's goalie situation, meaning of Ned resigns, Ullmark might be of interest there for the right price.
aedoran liked this.
Aug. 5, 2022 at 11:32 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Sway4Vezina
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2021
Posts: 809
Likes: 361
Quoting: Lancebmx
I don't mind the Detroit trade as a Detroit fan. I like Grezlcyk but don't like losing Rasmussen but feel he is replaceable. Jersey fans say Zacha at centre is a bad idea but that's up to you. Depending on Detroit's goalie situation, meaning of Ned resigns, Ullmark might be of interest there for the right price.


If Ullmark went to Detroit, would you trade Bertuzzi back to us? I’d say Ullmark has more value but I don’t know.
Aug. 5, 2022 at 11:33 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 105
Likes: 94
Quoting: Lancebmx
I don't mind the Detroit trade as a Detroit fan. I like Grezlcyk but don't like losing Rasmussen but feel he is replaceable. Jersey fans say Zacha at centre is a bad idea but that's up to you. Depending on Detroit's goalie situation, meaning of Ned resigns, Ullmark might be of interest there for the right price.


The problem for that trade is Stevie Y, look at all of the defenseman he has drafted and signed, all are min 6ft and at least 180 pounds. It's clear that he wants the team to have a heavy defense and I am not sure the Grezlcyk will fit into that plan. Like the player thou.
aedoran liked this.
Aug. 5, 2022 at 11:36 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 105
Likes: 94
Quoting: cMac73
If Ullmark went to Detroit, would you trade Bertuzzi back to us? I’d say Ullmark has more value but I don’t know.


If next year unlikely. Either you can sign Bert as a free agent, or the wings have signed him at an extenstion and are unlikely to trade him.
aedoran liked this.
Aug. 5, 2022 at 11:37 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,393
Likes: 8,047
Quoting: cMac73
If Ullmark went to Detroit, would you trade Bertuzzi back to us? I’d say Ullmark has more value but I don’t know.


Bertuzzi has way more value than Ullmark to us. Boston would have to add more than they should ever want to just to make the deal work. Considering we have Husso right now we wouldn't be desperate for a goalie unlike maybe some other teams. The problem with both of those players is there is not a need for them, they would just be nice additions but not needed so the price we would pay for either or both wouldn't be very high. Some other teams looking for players in those positions would be inclined to pay more.
aedoran liked this.
Aug. 5, 2022 at 11:37 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,393
Likes: 8,047
Quoting: AirmanSD
The problem for that trade is Stevie Y, look at all of the defenseman he has drafted and signed, all are min 6ft and at least 180 pounds. It's clear that he wants the team to have a heavy defense and I am not sure the Grezlcyk will fit into that plan. Like the player thou.


Yeah I know, I like the player though but Yzerman likes his size on the back end.
Aug. 5, 2022 at 11:42 a.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Sway4Vezina
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2021
Posts: 809
Likes: 361
Quoting: AirmanSD
If next year unlikely. Either you can sign Bert as a free agent, or the wings have signed him at an extenstion and are unlikely to trade him.


Yeah I forgot this was for next offseason and that Bertuzzi would be a ufa. With an extension I don’t think we are trading for him. So never mind Bertuzzi coming back to Boston in an Ullmark deal. Bertuzzi would definitely have more value with a long contract extension.
Aug. 5, 2022 at 11:44 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,499
Likes: 4,566
Pretty sure that Swayman deal walks right him to UFA status
Aug. 5, 2022 at 11:59 a.m.
#12
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 27
Likes: 8
Quoting: cMac73
I see what you mean it’s just in this scenario we need to get cap space so I guess another team who needs a good 1a/1b goalie could get him. I just saw that Minnesota had a few useful pieces for us.


I mean alot of teams needs capspace. Minnesota isn't the place, so yeah like you said another team would be best.
Aug. 5, 2022 at 12:01 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 21,633
Likes: 11,992
Quoting: Lancebmx
I don't mind the Detroit trade as a Detroit fan. I like Grezlcyk but don't like losing Rasmussen but feel he is replaceable. Jersey fans say Zacha at centre is a bad idea but that's up to you. Depending on Detroit's goalie situation, meaning of Ned resigns, Ullmark might be of interest there for the right price.


Ned requested the trade to Detroit I wouldn't worry about resigning him and with Husso signed for the next 3yrs it gives Cossa plenty of time to develop. I'd say a goalie is something Detroit doesn't have to worry about.

Quoting: Lancebmx
Bertuzzi has way more value than Ullmark to us. Boston would have to add more than they should ever want to just to make the deal work. Considering we have Husso right now we wouldn't be desperate for a goalie unlike maybe some other teams. The problem with both of those players is there is not a need for them, they would just be nice additions but not needed so the price we would pay for either or both wouldn't be very high. Some other teams looking for players in those positions would be inclined to pay more.


I agree 100% with you on this point.
Aug. 5, 2022 at 12:04 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,393
Likes: 8,047
Quoting: aedoran
Ned requested the trade to Detroit I wouldn't worry about resigning him and with Husso signed for the next 3yrs it gives Cossa plenty of time to develop. I'd say a goalie is something Detroit doesn't have to worry about.



I agree 100% with you on this point.


I totally feel Ned will resign, but if there was a chance he didn't then that would be the only way Ullmark would be interesting.
aedoran liked this.
Aug. 5, 2022 at 12:17 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 21,633
Likes: 11,992
Quoting: AirmanSD
The problem for that trade is Stevie Y, look at all of the defenseman he has drafted and signed, all are min 6ft and at least 180 pounds. It's clear that he wants the team to have a heavy defense and I am not sure the Grezlcyk will fit into that plan. Like the player thou.


I do agree and I really don't see him making any more trades this offseason. Him filling out the roster with UFAs is so he didn't have to give up any assets in trades like this. I also think this has been the goal in the last couple of off-seasons but with how bad Detroit was I don't think he was able to accomplish it until now.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll