SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The ripple on if matthews was two days older

Created by: Cardiac
Team: 2022-23 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 11, 2022
Published: Aug. 11, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Matthews was born on September 17th which is two days after the cut off for the NHL draft. If matthews were to have been born two days earlier, this is how the 2015 and 2016 draft would have shaken out

2015
1-EDM-McDavid
2-BUF-Matthews
3-ARZ-Eichel
4-TOR-Strome
5-CAR-Hanifin
6-NJD-Marner
7-PHI-Proverov
8-CBJ-Werenski
9-SJS-Zacha
10-COL-Rantanen

2016
1-TOR-Laine
2-WPG-Puljujarvi
3-CBJ-PLD
4-EDM-Tkachuk
5-VAN-Juolevi
6-CAL-Nylander
7-ARZ-Keller
8-BUF-Sergachev
9-MTL-Brown
10-COL-Jost
Trades
1.
TOR
BUF
  1. Matthews, Auston
Additional Details:
Would have been taken at two by Buffalo instead of eichel
2.
3.
TOR
  1. Schmaltz, Nick
Additional Details:
In place of strome
ARI
  1. Eichel, Jack
Additional Details:
Eichel would have fallen to 3 to AZ leaving strome to fall to 4 who the leafs select
4.
WSH
  1. Schmaltz, Nick
Additional Details:
Strome was the far and away third best prospect from 2015 and with him available, the leafs pass on marner and take the player who would be the top prospect in any other draft year.
5.
TOR
NJD
  1. Marner, Mitchell
Additional Details:
Carolina was still looking for defenseman so they would still take hanifin. That leaves marner to fall to 6 to NJ where they pick him up instead of Zacha
6.
CBJ
    Now with the first pick in 2016, the leafs draft patrik laine as matthews is no longer available
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2023
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the OTT
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    2024
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the OTT
    2025
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    20$82,500,000$72,137,366$212,500$0$10,362,634
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
    $8,700,000$8,700,000
    C, RW, LW
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $11,000,000$11,000,000
    C, LW
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $6,962,366$6,962,366
    RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    LW, C, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Washington Capitals
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $950,000$950,000
    LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $2,250,000$2,250,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $2,100,000$2,100,000
    RW, C, LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $900,000$900,000
    RW, LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $750,000$750,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    RW
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $7,500,000$7,500,000
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    LD/RD
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $4,687,500$4,687,500
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $5,625,000$5,625,000
    LD
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,400,000$1,400,000
    RD
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,800,000$1,800,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $800,000$800,000
    LD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Aug. 11, 2022 at 1:28 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2022
    Posts: 638
    Likes: 201
    Edmonton having McDavid and Tkachuk, woof
    xercuses liked this.
    Aug. 11, 2022 at 1:28 p.m.
    #2
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2019
    Posts: 5,265
    Likes: 2,154
    pretty sure the leafs would have taken marner still
    Aug. 11, 2022 at 1:30 p.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 3,616
    Likes: 3,044
    I still don’t understand why Carolina took a LD 3 years in a row
    xercuses liked this.
    Aug. 11, 2022 at 1:31 p.m.
    #4
    Thread Starter
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2022
    Posts: 672
    Likes: 281
    Quoting: vr1995
    pretty sure the leafs would have taken marner still


    If you look at the mocks from 2015 and if you actually rewatch the draft. Everybody has strome pinned over marner. He was the clear cut #3 at the time. If the leafs picked third that year, they likely go strome. The fall off between 3 and 4 was pretty sizable. Marner doesn’t hold positional value either so no reason they would reach.
    gary_ liked this.
    Aug. 11, 2022 at 1:32 p.m.
    #5
    Shibbal18
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2016
    Posts: 25,192
    Likes: 9,012
    Tim Murray would still pass on Sergachev
    Aug. 11, 2022 at 1:32 p.m.
    #6
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2018
    Posts: 1,139
    Likes: 499
    Very interesting.

    Never realized Matthews was 2 days away from the cutoff
    Aug. 11, 2022 at 1:33 p.m.
    #7
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2019
    Posts: 5,265
    Likes: 2,154
    Quoting: Cardiac
    If you look at the mocks from 2015 and if you actually rewatch the draft. Everybody has strome pinned over marner. He was the clear cut #3 at the time. If the leafs picked third that year, they likely go strome. The fall off between 3 and 4 was pretty sizable. Marner doesn’t hold positional value either so no reason they would reach.


    hunter was a london knights guy, the pick was marner and it really wasnt that much of reach even at the time
    Aug. 11, 2022 at 1:35 p.m.
    #8
    Thread Starter
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2022
    Posts: 672
    Likes: 281
    Quoting: Canesfan21_
    I still don’t understand why Carolina took a LD 3 years in a row


    Pretty sure it was fluery, hanifin, bean. Tbh I’m fine with hanifin as he was the clear cut #1 d man. There were rumors he could go 3 that year based on positional value. Fluery is fluery and it was the start of drafting LDs. They didn’t know they would have the chance to draft a top tier LD the next year. Bean confuses the hell out of me. They drafted two LD in the two previous years. If they wanted D, they could have gone with the top RD on the board in mcavoy but I guess they really wanted LD. Confusing for sure.
    Aug. 11, 2022 at 1:36 p.m.
    #9
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 3,616
    Likes: 3,044
    Quoting: Cardiac
    Pretty sure it was fluery, hanifin, bean. Tbh I’m fine with hanifin as he was the clear cut #1 d man. There were rumors he could go 3 that year based on positional value. Fluery is fluery and it was the start of drafting LDs. They didn’t know they would have the chance to draft a top tier LD the next year. Bean confuses the hell out of me. They drafted two LD in the two previous years. If they wanted D, they could have gone with the top RD on the board in mcavoy but I guess they really wanted LD. Confusing for sure.


    I never understood the Fluery or Bean picks, they just never developed and we’re eventually traded away for scraps.
    Aug. 11, 2022 at 1:38 p.m.
    #10
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 39,899
    Likes: 18,273
    I think the order would be

    1. McDavid
    2. Eichel
    3. Matthews

    It feel like it was talked about often back then and that seemed to be the consensus.
    gretzkyghosts liked this.
    Aug. 11, 2022 at 1:38 p.m.
    #11
    Thread Starter
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2022
    Posts: 672
    Likes: 281
    Quoting: vr1995
    hunter was a london knights guy, the pick was marner and it really wasnt that much of reach even at the time


    I never said Marner was a reach. He was pegged at 4. Strome was clearly a better prospect however. Anybody who followed the 2015 draft would know that. Strome was a cut above marner. Not to mention he holds positional value as well being a C. So you have the better prospect in terms of talent and the more valuable position. The leafs weren’t backlogged at C either. Face the facts. Strome was the logical pick there and given the chance, the leafs would have taken him over Marner if both were still on the board.
    Aug. 11, 2022 at 1:42 p.m.
    #12
    Thread Starter
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2022
    Posts: 672
    Likes: 281
    Quoting: NHLfan10506
    I think the order would be

    1. McDavid
    2. Eichel
    3. Matthews

    It feel like it was talked about often back then and that seemed to be the consensus.


    You think so? Matthews to AZ makes the most sense. I think BUF would have taken Matthews because he would have been the youngest player in the draft and was in the 2 PPG territory for the USNTDP. In his D-1 year he put up numbers similar to jack hughes’ draft year numbers. Matthews to AZ seems like the perfect fit tho.
    gretzkyghosts liked this.
    Aug. 11, 2022 at 1:44 p.m.
    #13
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2019
    Posts: 5,265
    Likes: 2,154
    Quoting: Cardiac
    I never said Marner was a reach. He was pegged at 4. Strome was clearly a better prospect however. Anybody who followed the 2015 draft would know that. Strome was a cut above marner. Not to mention he holds positional value as well being a C. So you have the better prospect in terms of talent and the more valuable position. The leafs weren’t backlogged at C either. Face the facts. Strome was the logical pick there and given the chance, the leafs would have taken him over Marner if both were still on the board.


    "Marner doesn’t hold positional value either so no reason they would reach." thats you. the only thing was postitional value, production was virtually indentical, marner had the btter IQ and 200 ft game, but like i said it was mark hunters pick, who drafted marner into the OHL and owned the london knights and was also the GM for over 10 years, hes back there now, the pick was marner
    Aug. 11, 2022 at 1:47 p.m.
    #14
    Thread Starter
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2022
    Posts: 672
    Likes: 281
    Quoting: vr1995
    "Marner doesn’t hold positional value either so no reason they would reach." thats you. the only thing was postitional value, production was virtually indentical, marner had the btter IQ and 200 ft game, but like i said it was mark hunters pick, who drafted marner into the OHL and owned the london knights and was also the GM for over 10 years, hes back there now, the pick was marner


    You are wrong, strome was the clear cut #3. If marner was the 3rd best prospect he would have gone 3 but he wasn’t therefore marner fell to the leafs at 4. You clearly don’t see my arguments and are stuck in your ways. We will agree to disagree.
    gretzkyghosts liked this.
    Aug. 11, 2022 at 1:47 p.m.
    #15
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 39,899
    Likes: 18,273
    Quoting: Cardiac
    You think so? Matthews to AZ makes the most sense. I think BUF would have taken Matthews because he would have been the youngest player in the draft and was in the 2 PPG territory for the USNTDP. In his D-1 year he put up numbers similar to jack hughes’ draft year numbers. Matthews to AZ seems like the perfect fit tho.


    I remember - that USTNP team was loaded....Matthews, Tkachuk, Kunin, Roslovic, Bracco (he was good then), Terry, Tage, McAvoy, Otter (Keller in some games).

    Actually, year prior, I think Matthews and Eichel overlapped for few games.

    But Eichel was seen as top American back then.
    gretzkyghosts liked this.
    Aug. 11, 2022 at 1:52 p.m.
    #16
    Thread Starter
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2022
    Posts: 672
    Likes: 281
    Quoting: NHLfan10506
    I remember - that USTNP team was loaded....Matthews, Tkachuk, Kunin, Roslovic, Bracco (he was good then), Terry, Tage, McAvoy, Otter (Keller in some games).

    Actually, year prior, I think Matthews and Eichel overlapped for few games.

    But Eichel was seen as top American back then.


    Ah. So Matthew’s to AZ in 2015 instead of 2024.
    gretzkyghosts liked this.
    Aug. 11, 2022 at 1:57 p.m.
    #17
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2019
    Posts: 5,265
    Likes: 2,154
    Quoting: Cardiac
    You are wrong, strome was the clear cut #3. If marner was the 3rd best prospect he would have gone 3 but he wasn’t therefore marner fell to the leafs at 4. You clearly don’t see my arguments and are stuck in your ways. We will agree to disagree.


    youre referring to mock drafts only without taking into consideration who worked for the leafs at the time and who was making the pick, you clearly dont get it lmao, strome wasnt even the clear cut number 3 as some people had hanifin, the reason why they had strome 3 was because he was center and was bigger, i see ur arguments but youre not taking in what im saying, but keep being arrogant
    Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:01 p.m.
    #18
    Thread Starter
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2022
    Posts: 672
    Likes: 281
    Quoting: vr1995
    youre referring to mock drafts only without taking into consideration who worked for the leafs at the time and who was making the pick, you clearly dont get it lmao, strome wasnt even the clear cut number 3 as some people had hanifin, the reason why they had strome 3 was because he was center, i see ur arguments but youre not taking in what im saying, but keep being arrogant


    You do know that when hanifin was taken 3, strome was normally picked at 4 to Toronto. You clearly have hindsight bias here. Teams pass on players in a marner situation all the time. It’s not like they were guaranteed to take marner the whole time. End of the day, I see your argument and hear it loud and clear but the fact of the matter is is that strome was the clear number 3 that year who if he were to have fallen to the leafs, would have been taken by them. It’s speculation ofc but I will believe what I believe based on the research I have done and you can believe what you want to believe even if I don’t agree with it. So as I finished my last statement, we will agree to disagree.
    Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:10 p.m.
    #19
    MikeBigcoch07
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2020
    Posts: 242
    Likes: 40
    Thank God mrs Matthews saw the future and held on tight for 2 days 🙏
    gretzkyghosts liked this.
    Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:12 p.m.
    #20
    Thread Starter
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2022
    Posts: 672
    Likes: 281
    Quoting: SheldonQueef07
    Thank God mrs Matthews saw the future and held on tight for 2 days 🙏


    She saw her sons future happiness in arizona and the happiness of an entire city in Toronto and chose Toronto. Noble woman.
    gretzkyghosts liked this.
    Aug. 11, 2022 at 5:53 p.m.
    #21
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 39,899
    Likes: 18,273
    Quoting: Cardiac
    Ah. So Matthew’s to AZ in 2015 instead of 2024.


    I’m not sure Arizona will be in Arizona by 2024.

    The McDavid/Draisaitl/Tkachuk line in EDM would be something else.

    Also, little bit of trivia here, Matthew Tkachuk is the only non-leaf to play on a line with both Matthews and Marner. In 2015 at NTDP with Matthews and Bracco (and at times, Roslovic). Then in 2016 with Marner and Dvorak on the MDT line for London in OHL. Now imagine…in 2017, he plays with McDavid and Draisaitl.
    Aug. 11, 2022 at 6:55 p.m.
    #22
    Thread Starter
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2022
    Posts: 672
    Likes: 281
    Quoting: NHLfan10506
    I’m not sure Arizona will be in Arizona by 2024.

    The McDavid/Draisaitl/Tkachuk line in EDM would be something else.

    Also, little bit of trivia here, Matthew Tkachuk is the only non-leaf to play on a line with both Matthews and Marner. In 2015 at NTDP with Matthews and Bracco (and at times, Roslovic). Then in 2016 with Marner and Dvorak on the MDT line for London in OHL. Now imagine…in 2017, he plays with McDavid and Draisaitl.


    I mean tkachuk has had some great teammates in the NHL too. Guadreau in calgary and now barkov in Florida. Obviously mcdavid/drai>>>>>guadreau/barkov but still crazy how he has been playing with top tier NHL talent since he was in his D-2 year.
    Aug. 11, 2022 at 6:58 p.m.
    #23
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 39,899
    Likes: 18,273
    Quoting: Cardiac
    I mean tkachuk has had some great teammates in the NHL too. Guadreau in calgary and now barkov in Florida. Obviously mcdavid/drai>>>>>guadreau/barkov but still crazy how he has been playing with top tier NHL talent since he was in his D-2 year.


    And with Keller, Kunin, and Brown going back to minor hockey
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll