What's funny is he's never admitted to being a NYI fan which all of us know he likely is.

experience is an advantage

It definitely does make sense. You think Seider is more well rounded for whatever reason and you went and cherry picked stats that back up your opinion. Those were outdated and the updated stats show you are wrong.

I said earlier in the thread that I would take Seider over Dobson. The only that is a fact in this thread is that Seider is not miles ahead of Dobson. I’ve proven you wrong several times.

If anything that “experience” hurt Dobson’s development. He was playing his offside with AHL caliber defenseman, little PP time. Coming into the league and immediately being put in a position to succeed like Seider is more of an advantage. He had a great supporting cast and spent a ton of ice time with Larkin, Bertuzzi, and Raymond.

You said I'm biased and that doesn't make sense. Why would I have any bias? Back up your opinion.

You literally haven't proven anyone wrong.

how was dobson not in a position to succeed and how is his supporting cast not as good as seiders. the islanders were a final 4 team dobsons first 2 seasons. doesnt make sense

It makes a lot of sense. You were searching for evidence that confirmed your belief that Seider is more well rounded. The stats were outdated but you still posted it because it supported your opinion,

I definitely have. Dobson overall was better than Seider last season , which is a fact. Therefore Seider can't be miles better at this point.

Dobson only played in his first season because of injuries, the isles thought he was too good for juniors and he was ineligible to play in the AHL. They told him he was basically the 8th defenseman. Dobson played 34 games on his offside as a rookie with arguably the worst defenseman in the NHL that season (Johnny Boychuk). He would go weeks without playing games , how is that an advantage?

Seider spent most of his ice time with Larkin/Raymond/Bertuzzi and got to run PP1. He was put in a position to succeed from day 1.

Because I've seen both players play and thinking one is better, I have bias? That is the weirdest argument ever because you're basically saying YOU have bias, too. That basically anyone with a position in a discussion has bias. I love seeing your argument crumble by itself without any help from anyone.