Forums/Armchair-GM

What does the trade deadline look like

Created by: Kyle_Davidson
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 15, 2022
Published: Aug. 15, 2022
Team: 2022-23 Chicago Blackhawks
Team Explanation
Ideally I would like to flip Domi and AA for at least 2nd round picks at the trade deadline. I don’t know if that is likely to happen given JT and PK trades will likely eat up 2 of our retained salary transactions should they occur at the deadline.
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. 2023 2nd round pick (CAR)
Looking for a 2nd round pick in 2023, but would also take the higher of the two 2nds Carolina owns in 2024.
CAR
  1. Athanasiou, Andreas
Additional Details:
Would be willing to take back a 1 year contract, Kase 1.5, Martinook 1.8, to save a salary retention slot. It obviously depends on where Carolina is at with those guys.
2.
CHI
  1. 2023 2nd round pick (EDM)
Looking for a 2nd, maybe if Domi plays well next to Kane all season they could get a first?
EDM
  1. Domi, Max ($1,500,000 retained)
3.
CHI
  1. Stankoven, Logan
  2. 2023 1st round pick (DAL)
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (DAL)
Additional Details:
Not sure what Dallas cap looks like at the deadline but they have room for Kane now and I remember reading they are interested.
DAL
  1. Kane, Patrick ($5,250,000 retained)
4.
CHI
  1. Lucic, Milan
  2. Monahan, Sean
  3. 2023 1st round pick (CGY)
  4. 2024 3rd round pick (CGY)
CGY
  1. Toews, Jonathan ($5,250,000 retained)
  2. Blackwell, Colin
Buyouts
  • Brett Connolly: $1,166,667
  • Henrik Borgström: $83,334
Retained Salary Transactions
  • Max Domi: $1,500,000 (50%)
  • Patrick Kane: $5,250,000 (50%)
  • Jonathan Toews: $5,250,000 (50%)
Recapture Fees
  • Duncan Keith: $5,538,462
DRAFT YEARROUND 1ROUND 2ROUND 3ROUND 4ROUND 5ROUND 6ROUND 7
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2024
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2025
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$72,068,463$237,500$2,207,500$10,431,537
Left WingCenterRight Wing
Logo of the CHI
Reichel, Lukas
$925,000
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the CGY
Monahan, Sean
$6,375,000
C
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the CHI
Raddysh, Taylor
$758,333
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the CHI
Katchouk, Boris
$758,333
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the CHI
Johnson, Tyler
$5,000,000
RW, C
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the CHI
Kurashev, Philipp
$750,000
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the CHI
Khaira, Jujhar
$975,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the CHI
Slavin, Josiah
$842,500
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the CHI
Entwistle, Mackenzie
$800,000
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the CGY
Lucic, Milan
$5,250,000
LW
NMC NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the CHI
Lafferty, Sam
$1,150,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the CHI
Johnson, Reese
$800,000
RW, C
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the CHI
Jones, Caleb
$1,350,000
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the CHI
Jones, Seth
$9,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the CHI
Mrázek, Petr
$3,800,000
G
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the CHI
McCabe, Jake
$4,000,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the CHI
Murphy, Connor
$4,400,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the CHI
Stalock, Alex
$750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the CHI
Vlasic, Alex
$916,667
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the CHI
Mitchell, Ian
$925,000
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the CHI
Hardman, Mike
$800,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the CHI
Stillman, Riley
$1,350,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the CHI
Regula, Alec
$866,667
RD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 15 at 5:29 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 33
Likes: 5
That Calgary trade is interesting! But this would be some nice work by Chicsgo
Aug. 15 at 5:30 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 13,079
Likes: 3,284
I think the Canes pass. Athanasiou isn't worth a 2nd, even a future 2nd. You could likely get the Philly 3rd this year, but I wouldn't do anything more for him.
CD282 liked this.
Aug. 15 at 5:32 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 19,436
Likes: 6,074
Quoting: Caniac2000
I think the Canes pass. Athanasiou isn't worth a 2nd, even a future 2nd. You could likely get the Philly 3rd this year, but I wouldn't do anything more for him.


I feel the same way about Domi.
Aug. 15 at 5:37 p.m.
#4
Jinx god
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 9,850
Likes: 12,854
Way too much for Dallas to give up for Kane. If the ask is any of our 3 top prospects, then they should just walk away.
Roxyrooo liked this.
Aug. 15 at 5:40 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 13,079
Likes: 3,284
Quoting: CD282
I feel the same way about Domi.


Yeah, I love Max. His game 7 against Boston will go into Canes history, but he's not worth that.
CD282 liked this.
Aug. 15 at 5:56 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 4,346
Likes: 3,162
Dallas doesn't have room for Kane now, don't think they will at the deadline either.
EsoYeezus69 and Roxyrooo liked this.
Aug. 15 at 7:01 p.m.
#7
Dr_Invictus
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 422
Likes: 119
CGY isn't trading a 1st for a 3C rental.
Aug. 15 at 7:42 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Chicago GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 8,341
Likes: 4,293
Quoting: Caniac2000
I think the Canes pass. Athanasiou isn't worth a 2nd, even a future 2nd. You could likely get the Philly 3rd this year, but I wouldn't do anything more for him.


As a rental, depending on his season and trade fit, I think AA should be worth a 2nd at the deadline. It’s obviously tricky projecting this type of deal in the off-season but he’s got the tools contenders look for and if he can be had for around 1.5 million in cap (50% retained or contract coming back) then I feel pretty confident the asking price is met.

Quoting: CD282
I feel the same way about Domi.


I definitely think Domi is going to be a harder sell than AA, hence me saving a salary retention slot for him, but at 1.5 cap hit and playing next to Kane for a significant portion of the season I think there will be some teams interested. I don’t want to repeat myself in the same post but assuming he has a decent season I don’t see why the asking price of a 2nd won’t be met.

Quoting: EsoYeezus69
Way too much for Dallas to give up for Kane. If the ask is any of our 3 top prospects, then they should just walk away.

The team that acquires Kane will have to give up some type of top prospect, and for what Kane is I’m not sure why you wouldn’t especially if you guys consider yourselves a contender at the deadline.
ChiHawk liked this.
Aug. 15 at 7:57 p.m.
#9
Jinx god
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 9,850
Likes: 12,854
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
As a rental, depending on his season and trade fit, I think AA should be worth a 2nd at the deadline. It’s obviously tricky projecting this type of deal in the off-season but he’s got the tools contenders look for and if he can be had for around 1.5 million in cap (50% retained or contract coming back) then I feel pretty confident the asking price is met.



I definitely think Domi is going to be a harder sell than AA, hence me saving a salary retention slot for him, but at 1.5 cap hit and playing next to Kane for a significant portion of the season I think there will be some teams interested. I don’t want to repeat myself in the same post but assuming he has a decent season I don’t see why the asking price of a 2nd won’t be met.


The team that acquires Kane will have to give up some type of top prospect, and for what Kane is I’m not sure why you wouldn’t especially if you guys consider yourselves a contender at the deadline.


Because:

1. With the way the team is constructed, they aren’t contenders, and they aren’t a Kane away from being contenders.

2. They cannot afford to re-sign Kane after this year, with Hintz needing a new contract.

3. Stankoven isn’t just some prospect, he’s a top tier prospect, he won CHL player of the year this season, he has immense talent, he’s the real deal.

4. The last blockbuster Jim Nill dod was almost a decade ago, by his history, he has never traded a prospect the caliber of Stankoven or a 1st round pick (except to acquire another 1st round pick).

5. If Dallas were to upgrade at a position, it should 100% be defence over offence.
Roxyrooo liked this.
Aug. 15 at 8:00 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 22,223
Likes: 9,514
Quoting: EsoYeezus69
Because:

1. With the way the team is constructed, they aren’t contenders, and they aren’t a Kane away from being contenders.

2. They cannot afford to re-sign Kane after this year, with Hintz needing a new contract.

3. Stankoven isn’t just some prospect, he’s a top tier prospect, he won CHL player of the year this season, he has immense talent, he’s the real deal.

4. The last blockbuster Jim Nill dod was almost a decade ago, by his history, he has never traded a prospect the caliber of Stankoven or a 1st round pick (except to acquire another 1st round pick).

5. If Dallas were to upgrade at a position, it should 100% be defence over offence.


6. Kane has full NMC and would likely chose his next destination...which would limit the market for him.
EsoYeezus69 liked this.
Aug. 15 at 8:43 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 334
Likes: 125
Not sure I have the same take on Athanasiou's tools as the poster, but that's what this site is all about. I don't see him being a target of the Canes.
Aug. 15 at 11:41 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 13,079
Likes: 3,284
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
As a rental, depending on his season and trade fit, I think AA should be worth a 2nd at the deadline. It’s obviously tricky projecting this type of deal in the off-season but he’s got the tools contenders look for and if he can be had for around 1.5 million in cap (50% retained or contract coming back) then I feel pretty confident the asking price is met.



I definitely think Domi is going to be a harder sell than AA, hence me saving a salary retention slot for him, but at 1.5 cap hit and playing next to Kane for a significant portion of the season I think there will be some teams interested. I don’t want to repeat myself in the same post but assuming he has a decent season I don’t see why the asking price of a 2nd won’t be met.


The team that acquires Kane will have to give up some type of top prospect, and for what Kane is I’m not sure why you wouldn’t especially if you guys consider yourselves a contender at the deadline.


If you think the asking price for Athanisiou is met, that's fine, but Carolina are notorious for only going after players with term
Aug. 15 at 11:50 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 5,052
Likes: 2,534
I’ve always liked AA and think his speed game would mesh well with canes but have a hard time seeing them give up a 2nd when he’d likely play in the bottom 6 barring injury.

Only salary they’d want to realistically send back is Gardiner. Right now that would cost it’s own pick to dump him, not sure what it’ll look like at TDL so no reason to project what that looks like.

I’d think canes would be more interested in Kane at TDL if he’s willing to waive.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll