ignore the bad trades that most teams decline but tell me if this is a contender with trades i used and told you to ignore

With a bit more experience this roster could make it to the cup in year 3 or 4.

Read the title bud

These values are all over the place… did you just blindfold yourself and pick random players to trade and trade for when making this ACGM?

You might as well just use the blank NHL template

The point of this isn’t the trades, it’s the lineup. And it still can be sort of realistic because Ottawa has enough prospects and picks to get some of these guys without hurting their roster.

but the lineup is made from the trades lmao

Nah. Too many holes, especially from a team defense standpoint.

Right but then what’s the point of making the trades. Why not just trade for all the those players for nothing if the values don’t matter.

Why should I even argue against what you said. The creator said ignore the value of the trades. He is just being hypothetical saying would if they had these players and this lineup.

Lol didnt you and juiceman come in here having to complain even after reading the title

I don’t know I didn’t make it. And it doesn’t really matter. But the players/prospects/picks going back to the other team could just be the starting pieces of the trade.

Not worth it brother thanks for participating!

Kinda silly to think 21 man roster with little cap and bonuses to pay is practical at all. Never mind the validity of the trades.

You can just use the NHL template so you can get whoever you want onto your roster without making any trades

More worth it to sign Ryan Murray or even no one instead of Keith Yandle. This team wouldn’t need another power play guy.

The point is that this is the Ottawa Senators even with some new players. It would look like some random team with the nhl template. Plus that would probably take longer because he’d have to add every player and create the free agent players he signed.

I see your point but you seem so against this idea it’s kind of weird.

Couple of things. The bottom 6 seems relatively weak outside of Norris. Steel, Drouin, and Milano aren't very good defensively along with Hoglander still trying to put it together. Hawlyruk is basically a replacement level player so relying on him as a fulltime player is also risky.

Where is Formenton? He's not on the roster or involved in any trades.

Relying on a rookie to be a top 4 Dman right out of the gate can also be risky. If he struggles you're looking at Brannstrom in your top 4 which probably isn't ideal. Also who takes the heavy defensive minutes? Losing Zub might hurt in that department especially on the PK.

Lastly, Yandle.... if someone gets injured and Yandle is playing minutes you may as well roll with 5 Dmen with how badly he played last season.

I think this would be a playoff team, but I don't know that they would beat teams like Tampa or Carolina to contend for a cup.

Getting rid of the trade for Keller and using that money to have Pinto and Formenton in your bottom 6 would probably make some more sense. Hamonic would also be a better option for the 7th Dman than Yandle.

It’s 10 new players on a 21 person roster lol. Hardly the sens anymore.

"Please ignore the 7 trades that completely change the outlook of this team and trade away 6 top prospects"

No, this team needs to add Price in nets to make it to a final

You just called him a pedophile for trying to explain to you that your experiment doesn't even have the slightest hypothetical merit because in the universe we live in, this won't happen. To answer your question, yes they'd compete. And if I can give you any advice in life, seek professional help bud. Tragic

It may be a little unrealistic but this team idea is hypothetical.

See what your not understanding is how the slang is used from where im from lmao and besides the point why comment about something that was clearly stated to be besides the point. I couldve traded a sack of rocks for all i care for each player