SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Deadline sellers

Created by: Elmo21
Team: 2022-23 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 18, 2022
Published: Aug. 18, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I know it's a lot for Gibson, but how often is a starting goalie available for 5 years?
I think Seattle wants to make the playoffs, and they need a reliable starter to do that.
Trades
1.
NYR
  1. Grant, Derek
  2. Vatrano, Frank
  3. 2023 4th round pick (ANA)
2.
ANA
  1. Driedger, Chris
  2. Lind, Kole
  3. Nyman, Jani [Reserve List]
  4. 2023 1st round pick (SEA)
  5. 2023 2nd round pick (TOR)
  6. 2023 5th round pick (SEA)
  7. 2024 3rd round pick (TOR)
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the ANA
2024
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2025
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$48,805,417$0$4,200,000$33,694,583
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,456,250$1,456,250
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,037,500$2,037,500
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 5
Logo of the New York Rangers
$875,000$875,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,295,000$1,295,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$850,000$850,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$822,500$822,500
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$425,000$425,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$762,500$762,500
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$762,500$762,500
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 18, 2022 at 2:29 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 5,135
Likes: 5,933
Ducks lose both of those trades by a good amount
OldNYIfan liked this.
Aug. 18, 2022 at 2:35 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 236
Likes: 83
Even if deadline sellers, why make a deal with the kraken, they arent about to be buyers.
Aug. 18, 2022 at 2:37 p.m.
#3
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 39,683
Likes: 24,605
We just signed Vatrano, so unless he's a disaster or wants out, the first trade is impossible.

An unprotected first in the 2023 draft is certainly a nice piece, but the rest of that package is just window-dressing. If offered, I hope Verbeek declines. We're on the same upward arc as Seattle.
Aug. 18, 2022 at 2:37 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 234
Likes: 50
Quoting: Salzy
Ducks lose both of those trades by a good amount


You think so? They're supposedly shopping Gibson, and I haven't seen an offer better than a 1st and the equivalent of 3 2nds.
Aug. 18, 2022 at 2:38 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 234
Likes: 50
Quoting: huey2107
Even if deadline sellers, why make a deal with the kraken, they arent about to be buyers.


They just got Bjorkstrand and Burakovsky. Seem like buying moves to me.
Aug. 18, 2022 at 2:39 p.m.
#6
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 238
Likes: 162
Driedger is out for the year, So he's not getting moved.

If Anaheim is out then John Klingberg would be one to get moved as well.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Aug. 18, 2022 at 2:39 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,565
Likes: 5,450
Why do they trade Vatrano after just 5 months? Seattle wouldn't get past the first round anyways and aren't in win-now mode. They shouldn't acquire Gibson now. Klingberg is the most likely to be moved. Maybe Shattenkirk and Stolarz too.

Quoting: Elmo
They just got Bjorkstrand and Burakovsky. Seem like buying moves to me.


To be slightly more competitive but it's still not a playoff team or a legit threat in the playoffs.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Aug. 18, 2022 at 2:44 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 236
Likes: 83
Quoting: Elmo
They just got Bjorkstrand and Burakovsky. Seem like buying moves to me.


Their pick in the draft is probably ~8-12 this year, with Bjorkstrand (a cap dump) and Burakovsky out of free agency, they arent making huge splashes and giving up on building their prospect pool. In an absolutely stacked draft class where players that will be going in the early teens could have been top 5 this year, it does not at all make sense for them to be giving up on that.
OldNYIfan and GiggywithGibby liked this.
Aug. 18, 2022 at 2:46 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 234
Likes: 50
Quoting: OldNYIfan
We just signed Vatrano, so unless he's a disaster or wants out, the first trade is impossible.

An unprotected first in the 2023 draft is certainly a nice piece, but the rest of that package is just window-dressing. If offered, I hope Verbeek declines. We're on the same upward arc as Seattle.


I don't think this will set the Ducks back massively. They have Dostal, who, unless I'm incorrect, could replace Gibson as the next starter within a couple years, and they need forward prospect depth. Nyman and Lind should become middle six wings, and the 2023 first is big, as you mentioned, as well as a 2nd.

I could be wrong, but it seems like for the purposes of the rebuild, Gibson is expendable and can be used to Anaheim's advantage to address a need.
Aug. 18, 2022 at 2:51 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 234
Likes: 50
Quoting: LGTBL
Driedger is out for the year, So he's not getting moved.

If Anaheim is out then John Klingberg would be one to get moved as well.


I didn't realize Driedger was out the whole year. You can sub him for Jones. I'm extending Klingberg in this, I think the Ducks could use him on the back end when they likely push harder for the playoffs next year.
LGTBL liked this.
Aug. 18, 2022 at 2:55 p.m.
#11
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 238
Likes: 162
Quoting: Elmo
I didn't realize Driedger was out the whole year. You can sub him for Jones. I'm extending Klingberg in this, I think the Ducks could use him on the back end when they likely push harder for the playoffs next year.


Yeah Chris Driedger tore his ACL in late May, And it's usually a 12 month long healing process for Goalies. Makes sense to try and resign Klingberg if you can get him for the right price.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Aug. 18, 2022 at 2:57 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 234
Likes: 50
Quoting: bhavikp27
Why do they trade Vatrano after just 5 months? Seattle wouldn't get past the first round anyways and aren't in win-now mode. They shouldn't acquire Gibson now. Klingberg is the most likely to be moved. Maybe Shattenkirk and Stolarz too.



To be slightly more competitive but it's still not a playoff team or a legit threat in the playoffs.


I think the Vatrano/Kravtsov trade makes sense for both teams. Rangers need bottom six wingers, and Kravtsov obviously wants and needs a change of scenery. He would fit Anaheim's timeline better than Vatrano, and has higher upside.

I didn't say I think Seattle will make the playoffs, but they're already deep at forward and wouldn't be too far away if they decided to make a push, which I'm predicting here that they do.
Aug. 18, 2022 at 3:03 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 1,515
Why would the Rangers trade for a guy they chose NOT to sign as a UFA? Makes no sense.
OldNYIfan and Fox_Czar_Cup liked this.
Aug. 18, 2022 at 3:08 p.m.
#14
GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 3,829
Likes: 1,701
Vatrano has term which isn't something NYR can entertain. Too many young players to resign next year, Miller, Laffy, Chytil mm.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Aug. 18, 2022 at 3:12 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 5,135
Likes: 5,933
Quoting: Elmo
You think so? They're supposedly shopping Gibson, and I haven't seen an offer better than a 1st and the equivalent of 3 2nds.


Vatrano alone is worth much more than Kratsov, who at most is worth a 5th at this point. He hasnt proven anything in North America

They arent shopping Gibson, those reports werent true, they were listening to offers for him not shopping him, and Gibson said he wants to be a career Duck

People on CF undervalue Gibson more than almost anyone in the league, as of last season he was still ranked a top 10 goalie in the league by execs/players and such
OldNYIfan and GiggywithGibby liked this.
Aug. 18, 2022 at 3:22 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 14,982
Likes: 11,371
I see Anaheim dealing Klingberg & Shattenkirk along with possibly Stolarz depending on the return not Gibson Lundeström and Vatrano
OldNYIfan and GiggywithGibby liked this.
Aug. 18, 2022 at 3:31 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,565
Likes: 5,450
Quoting: Elmo
I think the Vatrano/Kravtsov trade makes sense for both teams. Rangers need bottom six wingers, and Kravtsov obviously wants and needs a change of scenery. He would fit Anaheim's timeline better than Vatrano, and has higher upside.

I didn't say I think Seattle will make the playoffs, but they're already deep at forward and wouldn't be too far away if they decided to make a push, which I'm predicting here that they do.


Vatrano just signed in Anaheim. Seattle has depth but lacks high-end players. They would just lose in the first round if they made the playoffs.
OldNYIfan and GiggywithGibby liked this.
Aug. 18, 2022 at 3:35 p.m.
#18
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 39,683
Likes: 24,605
Quoting: Elmo
They're supposedly shopping Gibson, and I haven't seen an offer better than a 1st and the equivalent of 3 2nds.


Quoting: Elmo
I could be wrong, but it seems like for the purposes of the rebuild, Gibson is expendable and can be used to Anaheim's advantage to address a need.


Where do you see three seconds? Lind, Nyman and Driedger aren't collectively one second. Lind has had chances with two teams, failed to impress with either, and isn't close to where Max Comtois (taken after him in the second round in 2017) is, even after Max had a bad injury-wrecked last season. Nyman is nothing special, Driedger wasn't doing well even before his season-ending injury, and a third and a fifth added to that melange (including Lind) doesn't add up to three seconds; in fact, that stew barely rises to the level of "throw-ins" for any trade.

Yes, Gibson is expendable -- for Seattle's unprotected 2023 first (which the Kraken won't offer) and Oliver Bjorkstrand.
Aug. 18, 2022 at 5:00 p.m.
#19
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,281
Likes: 6,043
Quoting: Elmo
I don't think this will set the Ducks back massively. They have Dostal, who, unless I'm incorrect, could replace Gibson as the next starter within a couple years, and they need forward prospect depth. Nyman and Lind should become middle six wings, and the 2023 first is big, as you mentioned, as well as a 2nd.

I could be wrong, but it seems like for the purposes of the rebuild, Gibson is expendable and can be used to Anaheim's advantage to address a need.


Where are you getting that we need forward prospect depth? We're rated to have one of the top 3 prospect pools in the league. If our prospect roster looks depleted, its because half our forwards are under 24 years old, and we have already called up our two star players to play in the bigs.

Neither Gibson or Lundestrom are on the block. I'm sure Verbeek is listening to offers for all his players, but short of a home run trade, he has no reason to move Gibson, or anyone else who is a part of the rebuild. If we were going to trade Gibson, he wouldn't be traded anywhere in the Pacific, let alone the western conference.

People on the trade block at the deadline this year are Klingberg, Shattenkirk, Stolarz, Grant, and maybe Comtois depending on the year he has.

Also Silfverberg will not be on IR, he is back this season.
Aug. 18, 2022 at 9:51 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 234
Likes: 50
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Where do you see three seconds? Lind, Nyman and Driedger aren't collectively one second. Lind has had chances with two teams, failed to impress with either, and isn't close to where Max Comtois (taken after him in the second round in 2017) is, even after Max had a bad injury-wrecked last season. Nyman is nothing special, Driedger wasn't doing well even before his season-ending injury, and a third and a fifth added to that melange (including Lind) doesn't add up to three seconds; in fact, that stew barely rises to the level of "throw-ins" for any trade.

Yes, Gibson is expendable -- for Seattle's unprotected 2023 first (which the Kraken won't offer) and Oliver Bjorkstrand.


2023 2nd: Obviously worth a second
Nyman, 2022 2nd rounder: Obviously worth a second
Lind, former 2nd rounder: We can debate how much his value has dropped since being drafted, but he still has upside and has put up good AHL numbers. Even if he isn't worth a second anymore, a 3rd, 5th, and serviceable backup (It can be Jones instead of Driedger) should make up for that.
Aug. 18, 2022 at 10:31 p.m.
#21
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 39,683
Likes: 24,605
Quoting: Elmo
2023 2nd: Obviously worth a second
Nyman, 2022 2nd rounder: Obviously worth a second
Lind, former 2nd rounder: We can debate how much his value has dropped since being drafted, but he still has upside and has put up good AHL numbers. Even if he isn't worth a second anymore, a 3rd, 5th, and serviceable backup (It can be Jones instead of Driedger) should make up for that.


Nonsense. Nyman was a startling stretch at #49. None of the 5 mock drafts I referred to had him going in the second round, and here are some of the guys drafted after him that were and still are regarded as better prospects: Jack Hughes at #51, Tristan Luneau at #53, Elias Salomonsson at #55 and Lane Hutson at #62. In fact, Seattle's own third pick in the second round (#61, David Goyette) was and still is regarded as a better prospect. If you think that anyone but Seattle thinks Nyman is worth a second-round pick now, I think that you're mistaken.

Kole Lind, a third and a fifth doesn't get you a second-round draft pick. Jeremy Bracco put up GREAT numbers in the AHL, as did Martin Frk. Except for the still-unsigned players from the second round of the 2017 draft, it's hard to find more than two or three who've had a less distinguished career so far than Lind.
Aug. 19, 2022 at 7:42 a.m.
#22
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 234
Likes: 50
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Nonsense. Nyman was a startling stretch at #49. None of the 5 mock drafts I referred to had him going in the second round, and here are some of the guys drafted after him that were and still are regarded as better prospects: Jack Hughes at #51, Tristan Luneau at #53, Elias Salomonsson at #55 and Lane Hutson at #62. In fact, Seattle's own third pick in the second round (#61, David Goyette) was and still is regarded as a better prospect. If you think that anyone but Seattle thinks Nyman is worth a second-round pick now, I think that you're mistaken.

Kole Lind, a third and a fifth doesn't get you a second-round draft pick. Jeremy Bracco put up GREAT numbers in the AHL, as did Martin Frk. Except for the still-unsigned players from the second round of the 2017 draft, it's hard to find more than two or three who've had a less distinguished career so far than Lind.


Lind had a better point/game in the NHL last year than Comtois did.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll