SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Signings

New York Islanders signed Noah Dobson (3 Years / $4,000,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Aug. 22, 2022 at 4:15 p.m.
#26
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 72
Likes: 69
Quoting: PointStamkosVasilevskiy219188
A legitimately terrific signing from Lou Lamoriello?

AchingSelfishFlyingfox-max-1mb.gif


I'll expand on my reply to your previous similar post, lou has made a ton of good signings with the isles, the pulock deal was a legitimate steal, You may not like the guy but it is silly to try to say its surprising that he made a good signing. Just look at what that d core is locked up for.
Aug. 22, 2022 at 4:48 p.m.
#27
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 5,012
Likes: 3,523
At least he wasn't traded for a 2nd round pick.
weirfanno1 liked this.
Aug. 22, 2022 at 5:04 p.m.
#28
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,382
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: PointStamkosVasilevskiy219188
A legitimately terrific signing from Lou Lamoriello?

AchingSelfishFlyingfox-max-1mb.gif


Lamoriello often does well with RFA's, as long as they're not ol school hockey boys (thinks tough, "character" players). Those he over pays. He plays intense hard ball with others. For example Marner's camp was still pissed when he was resigned as a Leaf, for Lamoriello's refusal to give him some of the bonuses eligible on an ELC
oneX liked this.
Aug. 22, 2022 at 5:08 p.m.
#29
Farewell
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 3,060
Likes: 5,225
Quoting: Patriot12992
I'll expand on my reply to your previous similar post, lou has made a ton of good signings with the isles, the pulock deal was a legitimate steal, You may not like the guy but it is silly to try to say its surprising that he made a good signing. Just look at what that d core is locked up for.


For sure the Pelech and Pulock deals were absolute steals, Lamoriello has what to point at in terms of good signings, especially when it comes to defensemen. I'm more poking fun at his affinity for giving weak bottom-6 forwards (especially 4th line grinders such as Cizikas, Martin, Clutterbuck and Johnston) long-term contracts which (when combined) eat up much-needed cap space down the road (and yes, that's obviously not relevant when it comes to Dobson).

Quoting: BCAPP
Lamoriello often does well with RFA's, as long as they're not ol school hockey boys (thinks tough, "character" players). Those he over pays. He plays intense hard ball with others. For example Marner's camp was still pissed when he was resigned as a Leaf, for Lamoriello's refusal to give him some of the bonuses eligible on an ELC


Agreed, see above
Db1899 liked this.
Aug. 22, 2022 at 5:31 p.m.
#30
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 683
Likes: 272
The Dobson deal is a top 10 contract value now...going to be fantastic for the next 3 years.
Aug. 22, 2022 at 5:50 p.m.
#31
Leafs Sufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 4,073
Likes: 3,511
Quoting: TheFastAndTheFleuryous
HIGHWAY ROBBERY


Don't you mean highway.....Dobbery?



I'll see myself out.
PointStamkosVasilevskiy219188, Devil, oneX and 3 others liked this.
Aug. 22, 2022 at 7:49 p.m.
#32
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 565
Would think that kid would have bet more on himself. He might regret that 3rd year.
Aug. 22, 2022 at 9:03 p.m.
#33
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 346
Likes: 76
Not a bad contract but it's inline with the going rate (18-20 min TOI/game) for a second line D and he's only played one season averaging 18min/game. Haven't followed Dobson closely, is he really in line with Sergachev or McAvoy?
Aug. 22, 2022 at 9:09 p.m.
#34
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 548
The problem with most bridge deals is that when they expire, the player can go to arbitration and force the team into a short-term contract that takes him to unrestricted free agency in the minimum number of years. However, according to Cap Friendly, Dobson still won’t have arbitration rights when he comes out of this contract, so the team will have a fair amount of leverage on the next negotiation. In my opinion, that’s the way bridge deals should work. With arbitration eligibility the player has too much leverage, which is why I think we’re seeing more teams sign young players long term. They want to avoid that arbitration stage and get the player committed for a few years beyond the UFA minimum. There’ll still be a chance to do that with Dobson on his next contract, so this is the ideal bridge deal.
Hawkisles liked this.
Aug. 22, 2022 at 9:31 p.m.
#35
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 9,154
Likes: 2,223
Quoting: Hawkisles
Imagine thinking Dobson was getting 3 years/7 aav.


oh... I remember those Acgm's.
Aug. 22, 2022 at 9:48 p.m.
#36
MOVE THE COYOTES
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 4,441
Likes: 1,549
Quoting: Scooter81
He’s awoken


No kidding lol
Aug. 22, 2022 at 9:48 p.m.
#37
MOVE THE COYOTES
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 4,441
Likes: 1,549
He could've easily gotten 5x5 honestly.
oneX liked this.
Aug. 23, 2022 at 12:01 p.m.
#38
we miss leo k
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 5,973
Likes: 5,107
I assume the 3 people saying it's not a good signing are Mr. & Mrs. Dobson, and perhaps his agent? Not sure though.
Db1899 liked this.
Aug. 23, 2022 at 1:03 p.m.
#39
cautious optimism
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 3,004
Likes: 5,753
Quoting: Ritzy
Don't you mean highway.....Dobbery?



I'll see myself out.


Ritzy liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit