SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

klingberg trades

Created by: dickie_boon
Team: 2022-23 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 31, 2022
Published: Aug. 29, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
NOTE: in the canucks trade klingberg is retained forgot to add and all at the deadline
Free Agent Signings
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Klingberg, John
1$3,500,000
Klingberg, John
1$3,500,000
Trades
1.
ANA
  1. Gabrielsson, Hugo [Reserve List]
  2. Pearson, Tanner
  3. Rathbone, Jack
  4. 2023 1st round pick (VAN)
VAN
  1. Klingberg, John
  2. 2023 3rd round pick (MIN)
Additional Details:
i dont see this happening but if the canucks are doing really well they might do this?
2.
ANA
  1. 2025 3rd round pick (SJS)
SJS
  1. Pearson, Tanner ($1,525,000 retained)
  2. 2023 5th round pick (ANA)
Additional Details:
pt two of canucks
3.
ANA
  1. Brännström, Erik [RFA Rights]
  2. O'Neill, Cameron [Reserve List]
  3. Zaitsev, Nikita
  4. 2023 1st round pick (OTT)
OTT
  1. Klingberg, John
  2. 2024 5th round pick (ANA)
4.
ANA
  1. Svechkov, Fedor [Reserve List]
  2. Tolvanen, Eeli
  3. 2023 1st round pick (NSH)
NSH
  1. 2023 3rd round pick (ANA)
  2. 2025 4th round pick (ANA)
5.
ANA
  1. Knies, Matthew [Reserve List]
  2. 2023 3rd round pick (TOR)
  3. 2025 4th round pick (TOR)
TOR
  1. Comtois, Maxime
Additional Details:
pt two of nashville trade
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2024
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2025
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$82,500,000$60,895,417$0$4,200,000$21,604,583
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,650,000$3,650,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,456,250$1,456,250
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,800,000$1,800,000
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,295,000$1,295,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$425,000$425,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$1,450,000$1,450,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Klingberg, John
$3,500,000$3,500,000
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$762,500$762,500
C, RW
UFA - 2
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 29, 2022 at 1:22 p.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
I think TOR is probably the only realistic team mentioned that I could see going after Kilngberg at the deadline. Not sure if that trade works because of money, but we obviously have to wait in see what kind of position they're in by then.

EDIT: Sorry, completely misread everything.
Aug. 29, 2022 at 1:23 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 531
SJ doesn't need/want Pearson
Aug. 29, 2022 at 1:23 p.m.
#3
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
I don't think OTT makes much sense. While they're better this year, they're still exiting a rebuild and I can't see them moving top futures for a rental just yet.
Aug. 29, 2022 at 1:25 p.m.
#4
I hate this team
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 981
Likes: 979
canucks pass
Warpbox and Knuckl3s liked this.
Aug. 29, 2022 at 1:30 p.m.
#5
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,615
Likes: 17,624
Canucks pass easily. You want us to give up our second best prospect and a 2023 first round pick for a guy we could have gotten for free? EASY PASS
palhal, Warpbox, Knuckl3s and 2 others liked this.
Aug. 29, 2022 at 1:37 p.m.
#6
Amirov Forever
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 6,519
Likes: 6,015
Leafs dont do Knies for Comtois straight up
palhal and Logan_Ollivier liked this.
Aug. 29, 2022 at 1:44 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 1,483
Likes: 453
Leafs wont do that deal, they give up some picks and a Solid prospect for a player who is expiring and has only hit over 10 goals in a season once.

What is going on in the NSH trade I am confused.
Aug. 29, 2022 at 1:50 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 772
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
I don't think OTT makes much sense. While they're better this year, they're still exiting a rebuild and I can't see them moving top futures for a rental just yet.


Ott was in on him in the first place and they really could use him, he would be a great pairing with either Chabot or Sanderson. As you mention thou they are not moving the package above unless there is an extension coming with it, and at a lower AAV than $7 per.

Now if the season is half way done or more and branstrom has not made top 4 minutes full time then I could see them rolling the dice on him without the 1st. Especially if Zaitsev is part of the deal.
Mr_Gardoki liked this.
Aug. 29, 2022 at 2:07 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 254
Likes: 115
What in the world is that Nashville trade??
Aug. 29, 2022 at 2:08 p.m.
#10
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: NDoody
Ott was in on him in the first place and they really could use him, he would be a great pairing with either Chabot or Sanderson. As you mention thou they are not moving the package above unless there is an extension coming with it, and at a lower AAV than $7 per.

Now if the season is half way done or more and branstrom has not made top 4 minutes full time then I could see them rolling the dice on him without the 1st. Especially if Zaitsev is part of the deal.


Oh yeah, I know they wanted him, but yeah, they're not giving up that package. Personally? I don't think you guys should get him. Dmen who an score or drive offense isn't an issue for you. Dmen who can help stop goals is an issue. I think you guys should be targeting different guys.
Aug. 29, 2022 at 2:25 p.m.
#11
LosPatos
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 3,316
Likes: 1,823
These are all over the place
Aug. 29, 2022 at 2:29 p.m.
#12
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,647
Likes: 6,391
Quoting: Juiceman
Canucks pass easily. You want us to give up our second best prospect and a 2023 first round pick for a guy we could have gotten for free? EASY PASS


Lets be real, no, you couldn't have, you never had the cap space to be in the hunt for him. That's why we would be retaining 50% of his salary when we flip him to you (in the description of this ACGM)

To the OP, lets break down these deals. Ducks will expect a 1st and a good (not great) prospect in return for Klingberg with 50% retention. Any salary coming back has to be an expiring contract or its a cap dump and requires more to get done. We also need to adress needs with this trade, bottom 9 right wing, right handed centers, right handed D, absolutely no left handed players unless it is a top 6 capable winger to put on the Terry Zegras line, so they should be of the power forward, net front chaos causing persuasion.

Ottowa: Ducks need more to take on Zaitsev's deal than this returns. The best prospect coming back is LD, which is absolutely the worst position to bring back with the deal. Jarventie, Pinto, Ostapchuk, Bernard-Docker, and Thomson would be targets.

Cannucks: Two LD prospects, one who is probably an AHL lifer, and an old LW to make the money work, this isn't the deal. Pearson is the logical candidate for the dump, but he has term that I don't like and we are way overstaffed at middle six left handed guys. Prospect targets would be Juulsen, Lockwood, Karlsson. I don't really see any reason the sharks want Pearsson, even with retention, so I don't think that makes sense. Our third needs to stay put in this deal. Cannucks are incredibly unlikely to do this, as they have spent years depleting their farm system and trading away 1st round picks, which their GM has stated they cannot afford to do anymore.

Predators: Undersized 1st round bust LW, LH Russian pivot who hasn't played the NA game yet, again wrong selections. Targets should be Glass, L'Heureux, Afanasyev, Evangelista, Fabbro, Carrier, Prokop, Matier.

I'm really not sure what you are doing with that Toronto deal as "part two" Since it involves none of the pieces involved, other than to tie in we are getting a NHL current winger from the Preds, but he is no Comtois replacement. I don't think Toronto is interested in the deal either, unless they free up roster space, they can't take Comtois, they already don't have enough to sign Sandin.
Aug. 29, 2022 at 2:36 p.m.
#13
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,615
Likes: 17,624
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Lets be real, no, you couldn't have, you never had the cap space to be in the hunt for him. That's why we would be retaining 50% of his salary when we flip him to you (in the description of this ACGM)

To the OP, lets break down these deals. Ducks will expect a 1st and a good (not great) prospect in return for Klingberg with 50% retention. Any salary coming back has to be an expiring contract or its a cap dump and requires more to get done. We also need to adress needs with this trade, bottom 9 right wing, right handed centers, right handed D, absolutely no left handed players unless it is a top 6 capable winger to put on the Terry Zegras line, so they should be of the power forward, net front chaos causing persuasion.

Ottowa: Ducks need more to take on Zaitsev's deal than this returns. The best prospect coming back is LD, which is absolutely the worst position to bring back with the deal. Jarventie, Pinto, Ostapchuk, Bernard-Docker, and Thomson would be targets.

Cannucks: Two LD prospects, one who is probably an AHL lifer, and an old LW to make the money work, this isn't the deal. Pearson is the logical candidate for the dump, but he has term that I don't like and we are way overstaffed at middle six left handed guys. Prospect targets would be Juulsen, Lockwood, Karlsson. I don't really see any reason the sharks want Pearsson, even with retention, so I don't think that makes sense. Our third needs to stay put in this deal. Cannucks are incredibly unlikely to do this, as they have spent years depleting their farm system and trading away 1st round picks, which their GM has stated they cannot afford to do anymore.

Predators: Undersized 1st round bust LW, LH Russian pivot who hasn't played the NA game yet, again wrong selections. Targets should be Glass, L'Heureux, Afanasyev, Evangelista, Fabbro, Carrier, Prokop, Matier.

I'm really not sure what you are doing with that Toronto deal as "part two" Since it involves none of the pieces involved, other than to tie in we are getting a NHL current winger from the Preds, but he is no Comtois replacement. I don't think Toronto is interested in the deal either, unless they free up roster space, they can't take Comtois, they already don't have enough to sign Sandin.


Canucks arent paying assets for a rental d man. They werent even interested in Klingberg to begin with. We are selling, not buying
Knuckl3s and majormoose007 liked this.
Aug. 29, 2022 at 2:40 p.m.
#14
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,647
Likes: 6,391
Quoting: NDoody
Ott was in on him in the first place and they really could use him, he would be a great pairing with either Chabot or Sanderson. As you mention thou they are not moving the package above unless there is an extension coming with it, and at a lower AAV than $7 per.

Now if the season is half way done or more and branstrom has not made top 4 minutes full time then I could see them rolling the dice on him without the 1st. Especially if Zaitsev is part of the deal.


If Zaitsev is part of the deal and the 1st is out, there's going to need to be some multiple blue chip prospects at positions of need for the Ducks. Pick one from each pair (Greig or Jarventie) + (Bernard-Docker or Thomson) and probably toss in a bottom six right handed forward such as Kastelic, Lattimer, or Halliday.

Quoting: Juiceman
Canucks arent paying assets for a rental d man. They werent even interested in Klingberg to begin with. We are selling, not buying


Which you notice I mention when I broke down the Cannucks trade in my post. I'm contesting the "We could have got him for free" statement which we all know isn't true, you never COULD have gotten him for free if you had wanted him. That said, you are right, the Cannucks are not a match for the trade, for the reasons I had already listed.
Aug. 29, 2022 at 2:49 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 3,304
Likes: 1,835
I can’t see Nashville having any interest in Klingberg (Atleast not at anything near that price). We have enough pmd which is why we grabbed mcdonagh.
gmgb and GeauxPreds1 liked this.
Aug. 29, 2022 at 2:50 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 7,597
Likes: 5,193
NSH is the team that would have the least interest in Klingberg, so they pay the highest price? Madness.
GeauxPreds1 liked this.
Aug. 29, 2022 at 3:48 p.m.
#17
H.Lindholm Lover
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 3,598
Likes: 921
wait so the leafs give up knies + two picks for comtois? no thanks
Aug. 29, 2022 at 7:31 p.m.
#18
BORDEGOD
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 1,310
Likes: 490
Outside of Ottawa everyone says no easily.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll