SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

pls fix d

Created by: SellTheTeam
Team: 2022-23 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 4, 2022
Published: Oct. 4, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
VAN
  1. 2023 4th round pick (CGY)
CGY
  1. Pearson, Tanner
Additional Details:
anywhere
2.
VAN
  1. 2023 5th round pick (ARI)
ARI
  1. Myers, Tyler ($3,000,000 retained)
Additional Details:
half retained, should have little value
3.
4.
VAN
  1. 2025 2nd round pick (NSH)
NSH
  1. Nyquist, Gustav ($2,750,000 retained)
Additional Details:
any team that needs depth scoring
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the VAN
2024
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2025
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$74,476,667$1,250,000$2,000,000$8,023,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,350,000$7,350,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,750,000$4,750,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,650,000$6,650,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,950,000$4,950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$825,000$825,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$762,500$762,500
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,260,000$7,260,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$762,500$762,500
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$787,500$787,500
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$762,500$762,500
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,500,000$2,500,000 ($1,375,000$1M$1,375,000$1M)
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,650,000$2,650,000 ($1,525,000$2M$1,525,000$2M)
C, LW
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 4, 2022 at 3:51 a.m.
#1
BigMeech
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 349
made a lot of moves
didnt help the D
Oct. 4, 2022 at 6:45 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 962
Likes: 787
outside of the value being too high, jackets just extended peeke, are the last team that needs a winger and one of the last teams to trade D help
dopplsan, Viqsi and benjgc liked this.
Oct. 4, 2022 at 6:48 a.m.
#3
Nah.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,455
Likes: 4,335
Quoting: BJ_Lover
outside of the value being too high, jackets just extended peeke, are the last team that needs a winger and one of the last teams to trade D help


Plus, all that just to put him on the third pair?
BJ_Lover, Viqsi and benjgc liked this.
Oct. 4, 2022 at 7:30 a.m.
#4
MisstheWhalers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 23,648
Likes: 12,370
That defense doesn't look any better.
Oct. 4, 2022 at 3:18 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
I hate this team
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 981
Likes: 979
Quoting: Canucks123
made a lot of moves
didnt help the D


Quoting: MisstheWhalers
That defense doesn't look any better.


created cap space for next year to sign a d, got picks, got rid of myers
doesn't necessarily make the defense better right now, but with peeke rathbone will hopefully make the full time transition to the nhl and peeke could pair with hughes if the experiment doesn't work out
Oct. 4, 2022 at 3:25 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
I hate this team
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 981
Likes: 979
Quoting: dopplsan
Plus, all that just to put him on the third pair?


helps rathbone become a top 4 defenseman, peeke would be put on the first pair with hughes if the right side doesn't work out
Oct. 4, 2022 at 3:26 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
I hate this team
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 981
Likes: 979
Quoting: BJ_Lover
outside of the value being too high, jackets just extended peeke, are the last team that needs a winger and one of the last teams to trade D help


horvat is a center, could fill the 1C until johnson is ready
Oct. 4, 2022 at 3:53 p.m.
#8
Nah.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,455
Likes: 4,335
Quoting: vapodz
horvat is a center, could fill the 1C until johnson is ready


Problem is, not giving up that much for a rental, nor do I want to deal with whatever Horvat's next contract is going to be.

Plus, isn't 1C a little rich for him? I mean, yeah, he can technically play there, but I wouldn't really say he is the model of a 1C that you typically give up assets for.
Viqsi, MisstheWhalers and benjgc liked this.
Oct. 5, 2022 at 1:06 a.m.
#9
mostly harmless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 6,659
Likes: 3,144
Quoting: vapodz
horvat is a center, could fill the 1C until johnson is ready

We have, like, four guys who are also well suited for that task. Don't need another rental.
benjgc liked this.
Oct. 5, 2022 at 1:41 a.m.
#10
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: BJ_Lover
outside of the value being too high, jackets just extended peeke, are the last team that needs a winger and one of the last teams to trade D help


That's not an overpay for Bo
Oct. 5, 2022 at 1:41 a.m.
#11
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: Viqsi
We have, like, four guys who are also well suited for that task. Don't need another rental.


Horvat is better than Roslovic and Jenner. Are you sure Sillinger is ready to fill such shoes?
Oct. 5, 2022 at 1:42 a.m.
#12
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
That defense doesn't look any better.


It is better
Oct. 5, 2022 at 6:34 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 962
Likes: 787
Quoting: Knuckl3s
That's not an overpay for Bo


For the Blue Jackets to trade for a UFA it sure is
MisstheWhalers, dopplsan and benjgc liked this.
Oct. 5, 2022 at 3:31 p.m.
#14
mostly harmless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 6,659
Likes: 3,144
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Horvat is better than Roslovic and Jenner. Are you sure Sillinger is ready to fill such shoes?

We don't have to pay to add him, so he's still a better alternative.
benjgc liked this.
Oct. 6, 2022 at 2:48 a.m.
#15
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: Viqsi
We don't have to pay to add him, so he's still a better alternative.


Okay, just checking
Oct. 6, 2022 at 3:04 a.m.
#16
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: BJ_Lover
For the Blue Jackets to trade for a UFA it sure is


No, no it isn't, not even as a rental
Oct. 6, 2022 at 6:34 a.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 962
Likes: 787
Quoting: Knuckl3s
No, no it isn't, not even as a rental


You can say whatever you want but they wouldn't give this up for a guy that doesn't take them over the top in any type of way. Hes a good player, one that makes them better, but not one that the organization would give up this much for given where they are at right now. Again, you can quote this with "no. trade good" but it doesn't change the fact that the jackets wouldn't do that
benjgc liked this.
Oct. 6, 2022 at 2:57 p.m.
#18
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: BJ_Lover
You can say whatever you want but they wouldn't give this up for a guy that doesn't take them over the top in any type of way. Hes a good player, one that makes them better, but not one that the organization would give up this much for given where they are at right now. Again, you can quote this with "no. trade good" but it doesn't change the fact that the jackets wouldn't do that


Lol, how would you know? Are you an insider?
Oct. 7, 2022 at 6:55 a.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 962
Likes: 787
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Lol, how would you know? Are you an insider?


I probably know the Jackets organization far more than you do. Its the nature of being a huge fan of a specific team. I was just giving feedback on a trade you posted... why are you so passionate about shooting it down? The Jackets' true window probably starts 2 years from now. Why would they trade for an UFA who they can't afford to sign back due to the money needing to go towards sillinger/johnson/marchenko/gavrikov/chinakhov etc.
Oct. 7, 2022 at 4:54 p.m.
#20
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: BJ_Lover
I probably know the Jackets organization far more than you do. Its the nature of being a huge fan of a specific team. I was just giving feedback on a trade you posted... why are you so passionate about shooting it down? The Jackets' true window probably starts 2 years from now. Why would they trade for an UFA who they can't afford to sign back due to the money needing to go towards sillinger/johnson/marchenko/gavrikov/chinakhov etc.


Okay, I was just verifying
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll