SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

RD_01

Created by: rdesanctis
Team: 2022-23 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 10, 2022
Published: Oct. 10, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
BOS
  1. 2023 4th round pick (PHI)
PHI
  1. Foligno, Nick
  2. 2023 5th round pick (BOS)
2.
BOS
  1. 2023 4th round pick (BUF)
3.
4.
5.
VAN
  1. Lauko, Jakub
  2. Nosek, Tomas
  3. 2023 3rd round pick (BOS)
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the LAK
2024
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2025
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$81,991,667$0$4,650,000$508,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,500,000$2,500,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,950,000$4,950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000 (Performance Bonus$2,000,000$2M)
C
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,100,000$3,100,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$800,000$800,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$762,500$762,500
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$762,500$762,500
RW, C
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
NTC, NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
UFA - 8
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,687,500$3,687,500
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$150,000$150K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,137,500$1,137,500
LD/RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 10, 2022 at 10:37 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 3,320
Likes: 2,302
That Garland trade is awful 😂😂😂

If Boston wants Garland they have to give up at least one of Lysell or Carlo.
majormoose007, Juiceman, theleano1 and 2 others liked this.
Oct. 10, 2022 at 10:40 p.m.
#2
I hate this team
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 986
Likes: 980
That is hysterical
Warpbox, majormoose007, mokumboi and 3 others liked this.
Oct. 10, 2022 at 10:41 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2016
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 1,228
I see no reason for the Canucks to consider that trade proposal. Would you trade Carlo for Poolman, Woo and a 3rd?
Warpbox, majormoose007, mokumboi and 4 others liked this.
Oct. 10, 2022 at 10:45 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 8,640
Likes: 6,486
Sabres don't need Reilly. If they didn't take him literally for free today (just cleared waivers), why would they pay a 4th? Sabres left shot d- dahlin, power, Samuelsson, pilut, Bryson, clague.
Warpbox, mokumboi, gretzkyghosts and 1 other person liked this.
Oct. 10, 2022 at 10:51 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Warpbox
That Garland trade is awful 😂😂😂

If Boston wants Garland they have to give up at least one of Lysell or Carlo.


This is awful, but that counter proposal is kinda insane.
cMac73 liked this.
Oct. 10, 2022 at 10:53 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 3,320
Likes: 2,302
Quoting: DefenseFirst
This is awful, but that counter proposal is kinda insane.


A top 4 D or a top prospect for a top 6 forward is insane?
theleano1 and Knuckl3s liked this.
Oct. 10, 2022 at 10:53 p.m.
#7
MajorMoose
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 3,428
Likes: 2,603
Canucks counter with Lockwood, Poolman and a 3rd for DeBrusk
gretzkyghosts, Knuckl3s and Warpbox liked this.
Oct. 10, 2022 at 10:59 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Warpbox
A top 4 D or a top prospect for a top 6 forward is insane?


If you’re just talking pure value, for lysell i guess I’m sort of with you. I think garland is more of a middle six guy, and his contract is just okay. For carlo, ya, we’re in insane territory.

But then if it’s going into specific fit, the whole thing is a bit off. In general I’m not a fan of people wanting to hoard prospects. Generally speaking, taking the known commodity is better. But with boston, probably not the case, given that they’re pretty starved for high end prospects with it basically just being lysell and lohrei. Then look at their roster, and with marchand, hall, pastrnak, and debrusk occupying the top six wing positions, all of a sudden garland is a bottom six guy in boston. Both assets you mentioned would leave a glaring hole in the organization.
Oct. 10, 2022 at 11:00 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: majormoose007
Canucks counter with Lockwood, Poolman and a 3rd for DeBrusk

Oh good, this post was definitely missing the super clever ridiculously hyperbolic counter proposal
Oct. 10, 2022 at 11:05 p.m.
#10
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,618
Likes: 17,643
Quoting: DefenseFirst
If you’re just talking pure value, for lysell i guess I’m sort of with you. I think garland is more of a middle six guy, and his contract is just okay. For carlo, ya, we’re in insane territory.

But then if it’s going into specific fit, the whole thing is a bit off. In general I’m not a fan of people wanting to hoard prospects. Generally speaking, taking the known commodity is better. But with boston, probably not the case, given that they’re pretty starved for high end prospects with it basically just being lysell and lohrei. Then look at their roster, and with marchand, hall, pastrnak, and debrusk occupying the top six wing positions, all of a sudden garland is a bottom six guy in boston. Both assets you mentioned would leave a glaring hole in the organization.


He isn't a middle six guy. He is extremely good at 5v5. May be surprising, but Garland had more 5v5 points than every player on the Bruins not named Marchand and Pastrnak while getting third line minutes. He is also very good defensively.
Warpbox, majormoose007, gretzkyghosts and 1 other person liked this.
Oct. 10, 2022 at 11:06 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 3,320
Likes: 2,302
Quoting: DefenseFirst
If you’re just talking pure value, for lysell i guess I’m sort of with you. I think garland is more of a middle six guy, and his contract is just okay. For carlo, ya, we’re in insane territory.

But then if it’s going into specific fit, the whole thing is a bit off. In general I’m not a fan of people wanting to hoard prospects. Generally speaking, taking the known commodity is better. But with boston, probably not the case, given that they’re pretty starved for high end prospects with it basically just being lysell and lohrei. Then look at their roster, and with marchand, hall, pastrnak, and debrusk occupying the top six wing positions, all of a sudden garland is a bottom six guy in boston. Both assets you mentioned would leave a glaring hole in the organization.


Garland would have led 14 teams in ESP last year. He’s a first line winger on 5-5 that struggles on the PP. There’s very few (maybe 3-5) teams where Garland isn’t in the top 6, and even that’s stretching it
Juiceman, theleano1, majormoose007 and 1 other person liked this.
Oct. 10, 2022 at 11:10 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 3,320
Likes: 2,302
Quoting: Juiceman
He isn't a middle six guy. He is extremely good at 5v5. May be surprising, but Garland had more 5v5 points than every player on the Bruins not named Marchand and Pastrnak while getting third line minutes. He is also very good defensively.


Agree with most of it however he was fourth on VAN F in 5-5 ice time share
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Oct. 10, 2022 at 11:14 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2021
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 884
We literally couldve got Foligno for free but said nah so why would we do this
Warpbox and gretzkyghosts liked this.
Oct. 10, 2022 at 11:22 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 7,136
Likes: 3,156
Sabres decline
RavensShadow liked this.
Oct. 11, 2022 at 12:19 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 11,214
Likes: 10,058
Quoting: DefenseFirst
If you’re just talking pure value, for lysell i guess I’m sort of with you. I think garland is more of a middle six guy, and his contract is just okay. For carlo, ya, we’re in insane territory.

But then if it’s going into specific fit, the whole thing is a bit off. In general I’m not a fan of people wanting to hoard prospects. Generally speaking, taking the known commodity is better. But with boston, probably not the case, given that they’re pretty starved for high end prospects with it basically just being lysell and lohrei. Then look at their roster, and with marchand, hall, pastrnak, and debrusk occupying the top six wing positions, all of a sudden garland is a bottom six guy in boston. Both assets you mentioned would leave a glaring hole in the organization.


Garland is better than Debrusk and arguably Hall. He’s a great 5v5 producer who got very little PP time
Knuckl3s and majormoose007 liked this.
Oct. 11, 2022 at 12:30 a.m.
#16
Sway4Vezina
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2021
Posts: 809
Likes: 361
Quoting: mv21227
Garland is better than Debrusk and arguably Hall. He’s a great 5v5 producer who got very little PP time


Yes Garland is an underrated player but the Bruins need guys who score goals, and DeBrusk put up 6 more than Garland last year
Oct. 11, 2022 at 7:36 a.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: mv21227
Garland is better than Debrusk and arguably Hall. He’s a great 5v5 producer who got very little PP time


Oh, fun. Let’s talk even strength points.

It’s pretty well documented that debrusk was in the dog house until 2022, and then his role changed pretty drastically. Likewise, it’s pretty well documented that the canucks (their fans won’t shut up about it) started playing far better once they got a new coach. That knuckles dude has barely stopped short of telling me the canucks actually were a playoff team last year. So, lets look at 22, and these three players even strength points, shall we?
Conor Garland - 10G - 19A - 29 points. Not bad! Third on the canucks actually.

Taylor Hall - 10G - 27A - 37P leading the bruins
Jake Debrusk - 20G - 12A - 32P

And debrusk just got better and better as the season went on. Since he got a top six role he led the team in even strength goal scoring. So, your assertion is a bit delusional.
Oct. 11, 2022 at 7:37 a.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Warpbox
Garland would have led 14 teams in ESP last year. He’s a first line winger on 5-5 that struggles on the PP. There’s very few (maybe 3-5) teams where Garland isn’t in the top 6, and even that’s stretching it


🙄 the delusion in vancouver is approaching leafland territory.

Anyway, the bruins are certainly one of those teams. Duh.
Oct. 11, 2022 at 7:46 a.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Warpbox
Garland would have led 14 teams in ESP last year. He’s a first line winger on 5-5 that struggles on the PP. There’s very few (maybe 3-5) teams where Garland isn’t in the top 6, and even that’s stretching it


Holy crap, did you think you could just sneak this gem in here and no one would notice? You completely made up that crap. The real number is seven, and its a pretty exclusive list:
Seattle
Philly
NYI
Montreal
Los Angelos
Columbus
Vegas.
Oct. 11, 2022 at 10:03 a.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 3,320
Likes: 2,302
Quoting: DefenseFirst
Holy crap, did you think you could just sneak this gem in here and no one would notice? You completely made up that crap. The real number is seven, and its a pretty exclusive list:
Seattle
Philly
NYI
Montreal
Los Angelos
Columbus
Vegas.


What is this supposed to say? Are these the teams Garland wouldn’t be a top 6 winger on? Are these the teams he would be? Because he’d be a top 6 winger on all these teams but he’d also be top 6 on a lot more
Oct. 11, 2022 at 10:36 a.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Warpbox
What is this supposed to say? Are these the teams Garland wouldn’t be a top 6 winger on? Are these the teams he would be? Because he’d be a top 6 winger on all these teams but he’d also be top 6 on a lot more


You said garland would have led 14 teams in ESP. This was supposed to say that you completely made that figure up.
Oct. 11, 2022 at 10:36 a.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 3,320
Likes: 2,302
Quoting: DefenseFirst
Oh, fun. Let’s talk even strength points.

It’s pretty well documented that debrusk was in the dog house until 2022, and then his role changed pretty drastically. Likewise, it’s pretty well documented that the canucks (their fans won’t shut up about it) started playing far better once they got a new coach. That knuckles dude has barely stopped short of telling me the canucks actually were a playoff team last year. So, lets look at 22, and these three players even strength points, shall we?
Conor Garland - 10G - 19A - 29 points. Not bad! Third on the canucks actually.

Taylor Hall - 10G - 27A - 37P leading the bruins
Jake Debrusk - 20G - 12A - 32P

And debrusk just got better and better as the season went on. Since he got a top six role he led the team in even strength goal scoring. So, your assertion is a bit delusional.


Genuine question- what did you use to find this? I can’t find anywhere with these stats
Oct. 11, 2022 at 10:38 a.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Warpbox
Genuine question- what did you use to find this? I can’t find anywhere with these stats


Statmuse.

Genuine question - how did you go about making up your numbers regarding how many teams Garland would have led in ESP?
Oct. 11, 2022 at 10:54 a.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 3,320
Likes: 2,302
Quoting: DefenseFirst
You said garland would have led 14 teams in ESP. This was supposed to say that you completely made that figure up.


My mad, I meant 5-5.

Conor Garland (according to moneypuck) would not have led 14 teams, he would have led 15 in 5-5 points.

Conor Garland had 47 5-5 points:

Anaheim (Terry, 43)
Arizona (Keller, 41)
Boston (Pasternak/Marchand, 43)
Buffalo* (Skinner, 47)
Carolina (Svechnikov, 38)
Columbus (Roslovic, 35)
Detroit* (Larkin, 47)
LA (Danault, 40) Side note, I was not expecting Danault
Montreal (Suzuki, 35)
NYI (Nelson, 36)
Ottawa (Tkachuk, 41)
Philadelphia (Tkachuk, 41)
Seattle (Gourde, 33)
Vegas (Stephenson, 41)
Winnipeg (Connor, 46)

* Conor garland would have been tied for team lead
Oct. 11, 2022 at 11:14 a.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Warpbox
My mad, I meant 5-5.

Conor Garland (according to moneypuck) would not have led 14 teams, he would have led 15 in 5-5 points.

Conor Garland had 47 5-5 points:

Anaheim (Terry, 43)
Arizona (Keller, 41)
Boston (Pasternak/Marchand, 43)
Buffalo* (Skinner, 47)
Carolina (Svechnikov, 38)
Columbus (Roslovic, 35)
Detroit* (Larkin, 47)
LA (Danault, 40) Side note, I was not expecting Danault
Montreal (Suzuki, 35)
NYI (Nelson, 36)
Ottawa (Tkachuk, 41)
Philadelphia (Tkachuk, 41)
Seattle (Gourde, 33)
Vegas (Stephenson, 41)
Winnipeg (Connor, 46)

* Conor garland would have been tied for team lead



Does ESP stand for something other than even strength points?
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll