SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

When healthy this team looks good

Created by: The_Rocket
Team: 2022-23 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 11, 2022
Published: Oct. 11, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2024
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2025
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$78,997,917$1,250,000$2,082,500$3,502,083
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,650,000$6,650,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,350,000$7,350,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,750,000$4,750,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,950,000$4,950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$825,000$825,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,260,000$7,260,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$762,500$762,500
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,350,000$1,350,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$883,750$883,750 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
LD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 11, 2022 at 10:40 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Lot to like at that center position.

Then you look at the blue line and it looks really brutal.
Oct. 11, 2022 at 11:01 a.m.
#2
Kster
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 359
Unfortunately in today’s nhl, good does not guarantee playoffs. Think it will be tough for Canucks - Oil & Flames clearly better so they will have to battle Kings and Vegas (& Central teams) for 3rd or wildcard.
Oct. 11, 2022 at 11:06 a.m.
#3
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,615
Likes: 17,624
Quoting: DefenseFirst
Lot to like at that center position.

Then you look at the blue line and it looks really brutal.


That blue line somehow let in the 8th fewest goals against last season. 3rd fewest at 5v5. Demko is hard carrying
Oct. 11, 2022 at 11:08 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Juiceman
That blue line somehow let in the 8th fewest goals against last season. 3rd fewest at 5v5. Demko is hard carrying


Ya. Demko is good. I said the blue line sucks. That’s because they suck.
Oct. 11, 2022 at 11:08 a.m.
#5
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,615
Likes: 17,624
Quoting: DefenseFirst
Ya. Demko is good. I said the blue line sucks. That’s because they suck.


That’s true, however Demko should be able to bail them out enough that goals against isn’t the biggest liability
Oct. 11, 2022 at 11:18 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Juiceman
That’s true, however Demko should be able to bail them out enough that goals against isn’t the biggest liability


Right, so same as last year?
Oct. 11, 2022 at 11:19 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,928
Likes: 3,575
Quoting: DefenseFirst
Ya. Demko is good. I said the blue line sucks. That’s because they suck.


Quoting: Juiceman
That’s true, however Demko should be able to bail them out enough that goals against isn’t the biggest liability


I think it’s better than people want to give credit for. Hughes is elite, OEL is very good, Myers and schenn are serviceable, Stillman/Dermott is a perfectly fine 3rd pair. Certainly lots of room to improve but also not bottom 10 in the league like people would want you to think
Oct. 11, 2022 at 11:46 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 10,247
Likes: 7,114
above average forwards
above average starter, essentially a rookie backup
below average defense-- if Hughes gets injured, it looks really bad

unless they improve the defense, they won't make it far in the playoffs-- still a borderline team imo
UpsideDownQue liked this.
Oct. 11, 2022 at 11:48 a.m.
#9
Kster
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 359
Quoting: The_Rocket
I think it’s better than people want to give credit for. Hughes is elite, OEL is very good, Myers and schenn are serviceable, Stillman/Dermott is a perfectly fine 3rd pair. Certainly lots of room to improve but also not bottom 10 in the league like people would want you to think


OEL is very good? Leaving aside that disaster of a contract (easily top 5 worst in nhl), he is far from very good tears of joy
DefenseFirst liked this.
Oct. 11, 2022 at 12:31 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: The_Rocket
I think it’s better than people want to give credit for. Hughes is elite, OEL is very good, Myers and schenn are serviceable, Stillman/Dermott is a perfectly fine 3rd pair. Certainly lots of room to improve but also not bottom 10 in the league like people would want you to think


Hughes is very good on the powerplay. Everything else he isn’t just not elite, he’s not even good. OEL and Myers are a really bad second pair.
Oct. 11, 2022 at 1:37 p.m.
#11
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,615
Likes: 17,624
Quoting: kster34
OEL is very good? Leaving aside that disaster of a contract (easily top 5 worst in nhl), he is far from very good tears of joy


OEL greatly improved his defensive game this season. Atrocious contract, decent player
Oct. 11, 2022 at 1:38 p.m.
#12
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,615
Likes: 17,624
Quoting: DefenseFirst
Right, so same as last year?


Well our “defense” was technically top 10 last year. We improved our forwards so I don’t see why we won’t be better than last year
Oct. 11, 2022 at 1:38 p.m.
#13
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,615
Likes: 17,624
Quoting: villenash
above average forwards
above average starter, essentially a rookie backup
below average defense-- if Hughes gets injured, it looks really bad

unless they improve the defense, they won't make it far in the playoffs-- still a borderline team imo

Above average starter seems insulting. Would you consider Saros as an above average starter?
Oct. 11, 2022 at 1:54 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Juiceman
Well our “defense” was technically top 10 last year. We improved our forwards so I don’t see why we won’t be better than last year


Well, “your,” defense is all well and good, but i said blue line.

The blue line stinks. Is Mikheyev the improvement to, “your,” forwards? Is that really what you’re going to try to hang your hat on?

It’s the same team as last year. I expect a similar result. Playoff bubble, probably on the wrong side of it, but could sneak in. Scares no one.
kster34 liked this.
Oct. 11, 2022 at 1:54 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: villenash
above average forwards
above average starter, essentially a rookie backup
below average defense-- if Hughes gets injured, it looks really bad

unless they improve the defense, they won't make it far in the playoffs-- still a borderline team imo

Even if hughes is healthy it looks really bad.
Oct. 11, 2022 at 3:41 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,928
Likes: 3,575
Quoting: DefenseFirst
Hughes is very good on the powerplay. Everything else he isn’t just not elite, he’s not even good. OEL and Myers are a really bad second pair.


Quoting: kster34
OEL is very good? Leaving aside that disaster of a contract (easily top 5 worst in nhl), he is far from very good tears of joy


Two extremely incorrect takes the clearly indicate lack of comprehension from the posters, not lack of skill from the players.

Hughes is a top 10 defenseman. OEL is a solid #3. I guess you will have some excuse that the Canucks are lucky or something when they finish top in the Pacific this year
Oct. 11, 2022 at 3:44 p.m.
#17
Kster
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 359
Quoting: The_Rocket
Two extremely incorrect takes the clearly indicate lack of comprehension from the posters, not lack of skill from the players.

Hughes is a top 10 defenseman. OEL is a solid #3. I guess you will have some excuse that the Canucks are lucky or something when they finish top in the Pacific this year


tears of joy tears of joy tears of joy
I’ll be sure to put that on my calendar, next to cold fusion & when pigs fly
Oct. 11, 2022 at 3:48 p.m.
#18
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,615
Likes: 17,624
Quoting: DefenseFirst
Well, “your,” defense is all well and good, but i said blue line.

The blue line stinks. Is Mikheyev the improvement to, “your,” forwards? Is that really what you’re going to try to hang your hat on?

It’s the same team as last year. I expect a similar result. Playoff bubble, probably on the wrong side of it, but could sneak in. Scares no one.


I’m not expecting them to contend, but there are many factors to reasons why the Canucks will be better than last year.

1. Full year with new coach
2. Mikheyev, Lazar improved our PK which was our biggest weakness last season
3. Boeser and Pettersson should bounce back
4. Mikheyev and Kuzmenko could potentially provide more offense
Oct. 11, 2022 at 3:53 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Juiceman
I’m not expecting them to contend, but there are many factors to reasons why the Canucks will be better than last year.

1. Full year with new coach
2. Mikheyev, Lazar improved our PK which was our biggest weakness last season
3. Boeser and Pettersson should bounce back
4. Mikheyev and Kuzmenko could potentially provide more offense


Okay, so a guy with a career high of 32 points, and a guy with zero North American games (in fairness, i think he’ll be good) are the reason the forwards will be better. That and the vague notion that two guys should just be better because why not. Gotcha.

I’ll stick with he bubble team scenario because it seems like the only objective conclusion
Oct. 11, 2022 at 4:02 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: The_Rocket
Two extremely incorrect takes the clearly indicate lack of comprehension from the posters, not lack of skill from the players.

Hughes is a top 10 defenseman. OEL is a solid #3. I guess you will have some excuse that the Canucks are lucky or something when they finish top in the Pacific this year


Hahahahah me thinks the lady doth protest too much.

Cmon, a top 10 rating for hughes? Even in the rosiest of scenarios, that’s absurd. He’s useless at best defensively, can’t play the PK, and was 15th in even strength points. The guy had 29 secondary assists, and that’s the only reason he’s even talked about. Pardon me if poor defensive play and secondary assists don’t get me excited
Oct. 11, 2022 at 8:15 p.m.
#21
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,615
Likes: 17,624
Quoting: DefenseFirst
Okay, so a guy with a career high of 32 points, and a guy with zero North American games (in fairness, i think he’ll be good) are the reason the forwards will be better. That and the vague notion that two guys should just be better because why not. Gotcha.

I’ll stick with he bubble team scenario because it seems like the only objective conclusion


I said they could potentially improve our offense. Nothing is for sure obviously, but I don’t see any reason why they wouldn’t. Surely they are better than Alex Chiasson. Realistically, the Canucks either finish 3rd, or are a wildcard
Oct. 11, 2022 at 8:32 p.m.
#22
Thread Starter
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,928
Likes: 3,575
Quoting: DefenseFirst
Hahahahah me thinks the lady doth protest too much.

Cmon, a top 10 rating for hughes? Even in the rosiest of scenarios, that’s absurd. He’s useless at best defensively, can’t play the PK, and was 15th in even strength points. The guy had 29 secondary assists, and that’s the only reason he’s even talked about. Pardon me if poor defensive play and secondary assists don’t get me excited


He’s good defensively, the best PK defender on the team. 5v5 he allowed the fewest CA/60 on the Canucks last season. Play is heavily tilted in his favour when he is one the ice. To suggest otherwise is just ignoring reality.

Also, his 31 primary assists were 6th among all defenseman in the NHL. 2 more primary assists than Makar in one less game (same number of secondary assists for both players). Obviously, Quinn Hughes is not as good as makar, doesn’t have the same game breaking ability, but he is comprable as a playmaker no question.

You’re reaching a lot to undermine Hughes’s effectiveness and tbh it comes off as being bitter and jealous
Oct. 11, 2022 at 8:37 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: The_Rocket
He’s good defensively, the best PK defender on the team. 5v5 he allowed the fewest CA/60 on the Canucks last season. Play is heavily tilted in his favour when he is one the ice. To suggest otherwise is just ignoring reality.

Also, his 31 primary assists were 6th among all defenseman in the NHL. 2 more primary assists than Makar in one less game (same number of secondary assists for both players). Obviously, Quinn Hughes is not as good as makar, doesn’t have the same game breaking ability, but he is comprable as a playmaker no question.

You’re reaching a lot to undermine Hughes’s effectiveness and tbh it comes off as being bitter and jealous


Quoting: The_Rocket
He’s good defensively, the best PK defender on the team. 5v5 he allowed the fewest CA/60 on the Canucks last season. Play is heavily tilted in his favour when he is one the ice. To suggest otherwise is just ignoring reality.

Also, his 31 primary assists were 6th among all defenseman in the NHL. 2 more primary assists than Makar in one less game (same number of secondary assists for both players). Obviously, Quinn Hughes is not as good as makar, doesn’t have the same game breaking ability, but he is comprable as a playmaker no question.

You’re reaching a lot to undermine Hughes’s effectiveness and tbh it comes off as being bitter and jealous


If he’s the best pk d man on the team why was he 8th among defensemen in Vancouver for short handed toi?
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll