SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

Why not

Created by: RobbieM86
Published: Oct. 20, 2022 at 3:31 p.m.
Salary Cap: $82,500,000
Season Days: 175/185 (95%)
Central Registry Determination: This trade has been rejected because one of the teams exceeds the 23 player roster limit

Logo of the Anaheim DucksAnaheim Ducks

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Klingberg, JohnAnaheim DucksNHL25%$4,966,216011---4022--
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Zaitsev, NikitaOttawa SenatorsNHL-$4,256,757011---1000--
Formenton, AlexOttawa SenatorsNHL-$0011---0000--
Thomson, LassiWaivers ExemptOttawa SenatorsMinor-$0011---0000--
2023 1st round pick (Logo of the Ottawa SenatorsOTT)---100------
2024 2nd round pick (Logo of the Washington CapitalsWSH)---010------
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$14,505,83323446431011
Change$709,459112110
Final$15,215,292 (↑)24 (↑)45 (↑)66 (↑)4 (↑)11 (↑)110-2-2

Logo of the Ottawa SenatorsOttawa Senators

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Zaitsev, NikitaOttawa SenatorsNHL-$4,256,757011---1000--
Formenton, AlexOttawa SenatorsNHL-$0011---0000--
Thomson, LassiWaivers ExemptOttawa SenatorsMinor-$0011---0000--
2023 1st round pick (Logo of the Ottawa SenatorsOTT)---100------
2024 2nd round pick (Logo of the Washington CapitalsWSH)---010------
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Klingberg, JohnAnaheim DucksNHL25%$4,966,216011---4022--
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$4,118,4522346683513
Change-$709,459-1-1-2-1-10
Final$3,408,993 (↓)22 (↓)45 (↓)66 (↓)2 (↓)4 (↓)13022
Would you
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Oct. 20, 2022 at 3:42 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 16,676
Likes: 12,871
Yeah I’d probably accept this come deadline time
Dutchies liked this.
Oct. 20, 2022 at 10:49 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 6,668
Likes: 4,791
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Yeah I’d probably accept this come deadline time


If Formenton gets out of his WJC troubles, ANA dominates this deal. If not, it's a push and still worth doing.
Oct. 20, 2022 at 11:11 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,579
Likes: 1,255
OTT declines.

An offensive D isnt what OTT needs. We don't need a rental.
Oct. 21, 2022 at 1:00 p.m.
#4
couldnt afford 2nd t
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 441
Way too much. If they were open to giving up that much, they'd probably have Chychrun now. Chychrun is cost controlled for 3 years, which is perfect for Ottawa.

If there is an extension, maybe you could justify giving up basically two first round picks, a 2nd, and Formenton. I doubt Ottawa wants to meet Klingberg's price on a long term extension. I think one reason they were going after Klingberg this summer was that they though they could get him cheap because of the depressed market for players. He clearly won't sign cheap, because he took a 1 year deal to try and get his big contract next season. Part of the appeal of Chychrun for Ottawa is that he is cost controlled on a mid-term deal. I don't think they want to go 5-8 years on a big money defenseman when they will potentially have to pay Sanderson 8 million on a long term deal 2 years from now, or 4-5 million on a shorter term bridge.

Klingberg's value at the deadline, if he has a good season, is a 1st round pick and one or two minor assets. That's what these players usually go for as rentals. With that said, if the price on Chychrun is 2 firsts, Ottawa might as well just go after him instead of paying 1 first for a rental.

I just don't think it makes sense for Ottawa with where they are at.

Quoting: PLDGEY
OTT declines.

An offensive D isnt what OTT needs. We don't need a rental.


Ottawa had major issues moving the puck out of their zone last season. They were looking at players who could help with that. They were in on Klingberg as a UFA, until he signed with Anaheim.
penguinswin liked this.
Oct. 23, 2022 at 11:10 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 17,322
Likes: 12,362
Insane price to pay for a 30 year old rental dman who doesn't make them better defensively.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit