SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Worst players of 2022-23 by on-ice xGD

Created by: NHLfan10506
Team: 2022-23 Custom Team
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 25, 2022
Published: Oct. 25, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
For skaters, I used all situations expected goal differential and for goalies I used lowest goals saved above expected.

Source: https://www.moneypuck.com/stats.htm
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$90,000,000$87,482,143$0$850,000$2,517,857
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,650,000$3,650,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Florida Panthers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$1,750,000$1,750,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$2,857,143$2,857,143
C, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,450,000$4,450,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,875,000$7,875,000
C
UFA - 8
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$5,400,000$5,400,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$1,275,000$1,275,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,125,000$1,125,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$5,800,000$5,800,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,500,000$2,500,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 25, 2022 at 12:56 p.m.
#1
I make typos
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 5,335
Likes: 5,009
surprised that Lundell is on here
NHLfan10506 liked this.
Oct. 25, 2022 at 12:58 p.m.
#2
Let Him Cook
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 962
kampf is a solid third line center. even a great one for 1.5M
Oct. 25, 2022 at 12:58 p.m.
#3
GM Tom Dundon
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,958
Likes: 3,664
This team beats the Canucks right now - which would be weird since there are Canucks on this team
Oct. 25, 2022 at 12:59 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,871
Likes: 5,220
I'm shocked Fowler is on this list. Lundell too
NHLfan10506 liked this.
Oct. 25, 2022 at 12:59 p.m.
#5
yotes own canada
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 2,101
Likes: 746
surprised with lundell, lindell and dvorak here. extremely surprised with kopitar. fleurys been awful and we dont need analytics to see that. and gudbranson lol
Oct. 25, 2022 at 1:01 p.m.
#6
Ville Koho
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 553
Likes: 216
Damn not the goat Josh Brown
NHLfan10506 liked this.
Oct. 25, 2022 at 1:01 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,658
Likes: 4,898
how are there zero sharks on this list?
Oct. 25, 2022 at 1:01 p.m.
#8
RETIRED
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 2,482
Still win more playoff rounds than the Leafs somehow though
Oct. 25, 2022 at 1:07 p.m.
#9
Let Him Cook
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 962
did kopitar dirty
Oct. 25, 2022 at 1:29 p.m.
#10
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,293
Likes: 11,054
Quoting: Caniac2000
I'm shocked Fowler is on this list. Lundell too


Nah, it's unfortunate, but Fowler is the only real option to play against other teams top lines right now, which absolutely isn't ideal. He's good, but he's also not good enough to be the #1 option (Unfortunately), especially without any sort of support.
Oct. 25, 2022 at 1:35 p.m.
#11
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 30,116
Likes: 11,610
Heh. Ranking individual players by an on-ice xG stat obviously has some major holes.
Oct. 25, 2022 at 1:41 p.m.
#12
torontos finest
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 9,590
Likes: 11,268
moneypuck more like moneysuck
Oct. 25, 2022 at 1:53 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 42,665
Likes: 19,328
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
how are there zero sharks on this list?


Dunno. Let’s find a Sharks fan.
Rob32sjsharks liked this.
Oct. 25, 2022 at 1:58 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 42,665
Likes: 19,328
Quoting: mokumboi
Heh. Ranking individual players by an on-ice xG stat obviously has some major holes.


Sure, ranking players by any stat has limitations.

But on-ice xGD is about as good as any other.
Oct. 25, 2022 at 2:08 p.m.
#15
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 30,116
Likes: 11,610
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Sure, ranking players by any stat has limitations.

But on-ice xGD is about as good as any other.


Heh. Not when it's the only measure. In that case, it has significant holes, which makes total sense because it boils one player down to the expected exploits of six players based on a narrow formula that misses a lot. But it's cool, it's an "I'm just sayin'" thing.
Oct. 25, 2022 at 2:17 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 42,665
Likes: 19,328
Quoting: mokumboi
Heh. Not when it's the only measure. In that case, it has significant holes, which makes total sense because it boils one player down to the expected exploits of six players based on a narrow formula that misses a lot. But it's cool, it's an "I'm just sayin'" thing.


It’s supposed to be a relative measure of when that player is on the ice vs when they are not. So, if teammates get better when you step over boards, this is intended to capture that. It’s similar to xGF% but doesn’t ignore ice-time.
Oct. 25, 2022 at 2:32 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,658
Likes: 4,898
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Dunno. Let’s find a Sharks fan.


with the sharks besides Reimer playing so poorly i just assumed a few would be on here.
Oct. 25, 2022 at 4:35 p.m.
#18
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 30,116
Likes: 11,610
Quoting: NHLfan10506
It’s supposed to be a relative measure of when that player is on the ice vs when they are not.

So, if teammates get better when you step over boards, this is intended to capture that.


1- There's no relative measuring factor in on-ice xGD, bud. It just measures when they're on the ice.

2- ... along with capturing when they drag a player down or make mistakes that reflect on him in this stat. tears of joy

But again, it's no big deal. I'm just amusing myself.
Oct. 25, 2022 at 5:18 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 42,665
Likes: 19,328
Quoting: mokumboi
1- There's no relative measuring factor in on-ice xGD, bud. It just measures when they're on the ice.

2- ... along with capturing when they drag a player down or make mistakes that reflect on him in this stat. tears of joy

But again, it's no big deal. I'm just amusing myself.


No idea what you are saying here, but if you have a better stat to use this early, I am all ears. This one is about as good as they get to use this early since it will usually mute out noise (like lucky bounces). I have described it in the past, it’s the fancier +/- (which was in, then out, now in again…but just called something else).

Look at recent history and there is a strong correlation to successful seasons. So for me, it works.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll