SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Discuss

Created by: Wildfan5611
Team: 2017-18 Minnesota Wild
Initial Creation Date: May 30, 2017
Published: May 30, 2017
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2017
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
2018
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
2019
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
15$73,000,000$60,413,353$0$212,500$12,586,647
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$7,538,462$7,538,462
LW
NMC
UFA - 8
$6,750,000$6,750,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
$5,600,000$5,600,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$1,150,000$1,150,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$3,200,000$3,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
$5,571,429$5,571,429
LW, C
UFA - 4
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$7,538,462$7,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 8
$5,187,500$5,187,500
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$2,166,667$2,166,667
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD
UFA - 3
$4,166,667$4,166,667
LD
UFA - 4
$650,000$650,000
G
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 30, 2017 at 2:24 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 389
Likes: 28
I would ask for more from COL
May 30, 2017 at 2:44 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 8,223
Likes: 3,642
Both teams say no.
May 30, 2017 at 2:47 p.m.
#3
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
Pretty sure that Sakic wants LD help not RD like Dumba, Sakic already has Johnson and Barrie at RD.
May 30, 2017 at 2:48 p.m.
#4
Minnesota Wild
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2016
Posts: 998
Likes: 335
I'd rather chop my nuts off than see Landeskog on the ice for the Wild. No thanks.

Also, adding him makes it harder to keep Nino and Granny while also worsening the logjam at LW. Granlund alone did better this year than Landeskog did in his best year (13-14).
May 30, 2017 at 2:53 p.m.
#5
MNBassman
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 8,407
Likes: 3,647
I like a lot of what Landeskog could bring to the Wild, but the Wild have a serious log jam at the forward spots going forward. IMO, any trade involving a d-man going out would need to have one coming back...and/or have a forward going out too.
Something like: Dumba and Haula for Landeskog and Nicolas Meloche.
May 30, 2017 at 3:17 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 8,223
Likes: 3,642
Quoting: MNBassman
I like a lot of what Landeskog could bring to the Wild, but the Wild have a serious log jam at the forward spots going forward. IMO, any trade involving a d-man going out would need to have one coming back...and/or have a forward going out too.
Something like: Dumba and Haula for Landeskog and Nicolas Meloche.


I do too. Just hard for a trade with that big of names happening within the Division.
Wildfan5611 liked this.
May 30, 2017 at 3:58 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Wildfan5611
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 89
Likes: 2
Quoting: wabit
Quoting: MNBassman
I like a lot of what Landeskog could bring to the Wild, but the Wild have a serious log jam at the forward spots going forward. IMO, any trade involving a d-man going out would need to have one coming back...and/or have a forward going out too.
Something like: Dumba and Haula for Landeskog and Nicolas Meloche.


I do too. Just hard for a trade with that big of names happening within the Division.


I was thinking the same that it would be hard to trade within division. It's not necessarily impossible though. We've seen some pretty big names tossed around the central before. Sharp to Dallas, Ladd to Chicago (albeit a rental). Of course those aren't half the magnitude to this trade but Colorado could be a very realistic trade partner this offseason.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll