SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What would Garland and Schenn cost

Created by: JTrades
Team: 2022-23 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 11, 2022
Published: Nov. 11, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2024
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
2025
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$82,055,413$212,500$0$444,587
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$950,000$950,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,950,000$4,950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$796,667$796,667
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$840,630$840,630
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$7,500,000$7,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,400,000$1,400,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,687,500$4,687,500
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,800,000$1,800,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$762,500$762,500
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$838,750$838,750
RW
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 11, 2022 at 12:57 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 9,656
Likes: 9,033
Liljegren+
Nov. 11, 2022 at 1:01 p.m.
#2
Hakuna Matata
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 33,190
Likes: 20,724
Garland would probs cost a 1st + Niemela as the term would be the factor

Schenn probs a 3rd at the TDL maybe a 2nd if someone was desperate

Would maybe explore a Garland trade but there would be a few factors that come into play for that to happen (i.e. Muzzin being done for the season)
majormoose007 liked this.
Nov. 11, 2022 at 1:06 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,605
Likes: 915
Garland isn’t what the Leafs need at all
Logan_Ollivier liked this.
Nov. 11, 2022 at 1:07 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 2,219
I imagine for both it would likely be Niemela and a first which sounds like a lot but the first is probably late so not that big of a deal.

I would also do Garland for Liljegren and a small piece but highly doubt that’s offered
JTrades and majormoose007 liked this.
Nov. 11, 2022 at 1:09 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 353
Quoting: Warpbox
I imagine for both it would likely be Niemela and a first which sounds like a lot but the first is probably late so not that big of a deal.

I would also do Garland for Liljegren and a small piece but highly doubt that’s offered


What would a deal around Sandin look like?
Nov. 11, 2022 at 1:28 p.m.
#6
Hakuna Matata
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 33,190
Likes: 20,724
Quoting: Warpbox
I imagine for both it would likely be Niemela and a first which sounds like a lot but the first is probably late so not that big of a deal.

I would also do Garland for Liljegren and a small piece but highly doubt that’s offered


Since Garland got 4 years of control I would honestly explore it. Yes Niemela could be in the NHL as soon as next year but rn Leafs should look for an upgrade in the top 6

Now to make cap work Kerfoot would probs also have to be included (i.e. 1st + Kerfoot and Niemela for like Garland and maybe a 6th) but its doable

As Rutherford and Dubas have made some intriguing in the past
Warpbox liked this.
Nov. 11, 2022 at 1:33 p.m.
#7
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: mv21227
Liljegren+


Keep dreaming. We already have the cheap version of Garland in Kerfoot.
Nov. 11, 2022 at 1:33 p.m.
#8
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: T0R
Garland isn’t what the Leafs need at all


We already have everything he brings in Kerfoot.
Nov. 11, 2022 at 1:34 p.m.
#9
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: JTrades
What would a deal around Sandin look like?


It would look utterly terrible for TO.
Nov. 11, 2022 at 1:36 p.m.
#10
Hakuna Matata
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 33,190
Likes: 20,724
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
We already have everything he brings in Kerfoot.


mmmm










Garland would be a significant upgrade over Kerfoot and put him with Matthews/Marner or Tavares/Nylander probs would get 50-60 points and 20 goals
mv21227, Warpbox, majormoose007 and 2 others liked this.
Nov. 11, 2022 at 1:36 p.m.
#11
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: Warpbox
I imagine for both it would likely be Niemela and a first which sounds like a lot but the first is probably late so not that big of a deal.

I would also do Garland for Liljegren and a small piece but highly doubt that’s offered


I have no idea how a smallish winger who scores 50 points a year is worth so much. He's not really anything special. Just a good secondary scorer. Especially to TO who absolutely has no need for Garland. They already have Kerfoot who costs 1.5 less in cap and nothing to acquire. To ask for Liljegren who's is already a top 4 RD on a team that is both better all around and defensively is ridiculous. But par for the course here. You won't get a 1st, or Niemela from TO. They just don't need Garland.
Mediumyeet liked this.
Nov. 11, 2022 at 1:38 p.m.
#12
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: aadoyle
mmmm










Garland would be a significant upgrade over Kerfoot and put him with Matthews/Marner or Tavares/Nylander probs would get 50-60 points and 20 goals


JFresh is so arbitrary. He always has these secondary mid range guys looking like hero's and then people think they are something special. Craig Smith was one of the absolute best players in the league according to Jfresh when he signed in Boston and is good but nothing special. JFresh just doesn't make sense
Nov. 11, 2022 at 1:38 p.m.
#13
Hakuna Matata
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 33,190
Likes: 20,724
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
JFresh is so arbitrary. He always has these secondary mid range guys looking like hero's and then people think they are something special. Craig Smith was one of the absolute best players in the league according to Jfresh when he signed in Boston and is good but nothing special. JFresh just doesn't make sense


Even so Garland's the better player in comparison to Kerfoot and while he does not PK we could then go find a 2-way cheap 3c who can replace Engvall

2 upgrades in 1 go
Warpbox and ChiHawk liked this.
Nov. 11, 2022 at 1:50 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 9,656
Likes: 9,033
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Keep dreaming. We already have the cheap version of Garland in Kerfoot.


The worse version of Garland in Kerfoot

Why would the Canucks trade a top 6 winger, who’s great at 5v5, and signed for 4 more years at a more than reasonable cap hit, for anything less than a top 4 RHD? It’ll cost good assets to get a player like Garland
Warpbox, ChiHawk and majormoose007 liked this.
Nov. 11, 2022 at 2:08 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 2,219
Quoting: JTrades
What would a deal around Sandin look like?


I don’t think there is a fair one tbh. I like Sandin a lot but Canucks LD is fine for the most part. Unless this team somehow gets rid of OEL I don’t see the fit. I’d be worried about his development here, with OEL likely taking up to much ice time.

Canucks just need RD
Nov. 11, 2022 at 2:22 p.m.
#16
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,070
Likes: 22,464
Leafs need Sandin at LHD. Leafs need Sandin and his low cap next year. Leafs may need Kerfoot at centre this year (not Garland)
Nov. 11, 2022 at 2:26 p.m.
#17
Hakuna Matata
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 33,190
Likes: 20,724
Quoting: palhal
Leafs need Sandin at LHD. Leafs need Sandin and his low cap next year. Leafs may need Kerfoot at centre this year (not Garland)


Problem is rn Sandin has basically been thrown to RD cause Brodie outplayed him and he has not looked good this year.

And no we really dont need Sandin's lower cap hit next year. Cap potentially goes up by at lowest 4mill for 2023 and if Muzzin is done Leafs have money to spend. Could trade him for an upgrade to be honest especially if he continues to struggle.

As for Kerfoot at C that ship sailed a long time ago. LW is where he thrives. They should be exploring all C options available via trade as Engvall is not the solution rn
Nov. 11, 2022 at 2:34 p.m.
#18
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,070
Likes: 22,464
Quoting: aadoyle
Problem is rn Sandin has basically been thrown to RD cause Brodie outplayed him and he has not looked good this year.

And no we really dont need Sandin's lower cap hit next year. Cap potentially goes up 4mill for 2023 and if Muzzin is done Leafs have money to spend. Could trade him for an upgrade to be honest especially if he continues to struggle.

As for Kerfoot at C that ship sailed a long time ago. LW is where he thrives.


I disagree on few points. Sure the cap goes up, but other players will want a share of it too. Kerfoot, if any Injury happens to Tavares and Matthews, Kerfoot is the 2c, just like he did so well in the 2021 playoffs.
Aren't Brodie, Liljgren and Holl the RHD, and Reilly, Sandin and Giordano the LHD. ,
Nov. 11, 2022 at 2:36 p.m.
#19
Hakuna Matata
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 33,190
Likes: 20,724
Quoting: palhal
I disagree on few points. Sure the cap goes up, but other players will want a share of it too. Kerfoot, if any Injury happens to Tavares and Matthews, Kerfoot is the 2c, just like he did so well in the 2021 playoffs.
Aren't Brodie, Liljgren and Holl the RHD, and Reilly, Sandin and Giordano the LHD. ,


Brodie is a LD who plays RD

rn we are playing

Rielly-Liligren
Brodie-Holl
Gio-Sandin

And its been working nicely with Brodie-Holl putting up some good numbers at both ends
Nov. 11, 2022 at 2:54 p.m.
#20
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: aadoyle
mmmm










Garland would be a significant upgrade over Kerfoot and put him with Matthews/Marner or Tavares/Nylander probs would get 50-60 points and 20 goals


So the same as Kerfoot and Garland at the same cap and without giving up a 1st and good prospect for a guy we just don't need.
Nov. 11, 2022 at 3:01 p.m.
#21
Hakuna Matata
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 33,190
Likes: 20,724
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
So the same as Kerfoot and Garland at the same cap and without giving up a 1st and good prospect for a guy we just don't need.


Look to simply put it as u dont seem to get it

Garland is the better player. Only benefit to Kerfoot is the PK thats it. Thats also replaceable as there are better PKing 3c's out there

Garland is the guy you want in the top 6 while Kerfoot is just a utility guy u place anywhere in the lineup who can do a little bit of everything but not excel at it

If all it costs is a 1st and Niemela to upgrade over Kerfoot for the next 4 years do it. As getting potentially 20 goals and 60 points a season out of Garland will make it all worth it for the long run.
Nov. 11, 2022 at 3:16 p.m.
#22
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: mv21227
The worse version of Garland in Kerfoot

Why would the Canucks trade a top 6 winger, who’s great at 5v5, and signed for 4 more years at a more than reasonable cap hit, for anything less than a top 4 RHD? It’ll cost good assets to get a player like Garland


All the power to you. But TO has no need for him at all. He's redundant. If TO obtains a forward it will be a power forward or a centre, not a small winger
Nov. 11, 2022 at 3:20 p.m.
#23
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: aadoyle
Look to simply put it as u dont seem to get it

Garland is the better player. Only benefit to Kerfoot is the PK thats it. Thats also replaceable as there are better PKing 3c's out there

Garland is the guy you want in the top 6 while Kerfoot is just a utility guy u place anywhere in the lineup who can do a little bit of everything but not excel at it

If all it costs is a 1st and Niemela to upgrade over Kerfoot for the next 4 years do it. As getting potentially 20 goals and 60 points a season out of Garland will make it all worth it for the long run.


Oh I get it. Garland is a bit better than Kerfoot. But he also costs 4.5 million a year and apparently a top prospect and a 1st. All so we can get a guy who may score 50-60 points playing with our stars. Kerfoot and Bunting make the same amount of money and scored 50 and 60 points respectively last season. Why on earth would we spend a 1st and a top prospect and a million more in cap to get the same results we are already getting? That's the point here. I don't care what the perceived fair value is for Garland, it doesn't make any sense for TO to grab him. We already have guys who are producing at his level and make less money. Are you suggesting we replace both with Garland? Seems like 2 good depth players are better than 1 good depth player.
Nov. 11, 2022 at 3:22 p.m.
#24
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: aadoyle
Problem is rn Sandin has basically been thrown to RD cause Brodie outplayed him and he has not looked good this year.

And no we really dont need Sandin's lower cap hit next year. Cap potentially goes up by at lowest 4mill for 2023 and if Muzzin is done Leafs have money to spend. Could trade him for an upgrade to be honest especially if he continues to struggle.

As for Kerfoot at C that ship sailed a long time ago. LW is where he thrives. They should be exploring all C options available via trade as Engvall is not the solution rn


Looks like Sandin is the new whipping boy, no matter how good he looks he's going to be crap to so many fans who just need to **** on guys.
Nov. 11, 2022 at 3:24 p.m.
#25
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: aadoyle
Look to simply put it as u dont seem to get it

Garland is the better player. Only benefit to Kerfoot is the PK thats it. Thats also replaceable as there are better PKing 3c's out there

Garland is the guy you want in the top 6 while Kerfoot is just a utility guy u place anywhere in the lineup who can do a little bit of everything but not excel at it

If all it costs is a 1st and Niemela to upgrade over Kerfoot for the next 4 years do it. As getting potentially 20 goals and 60 points a season out of Garland will make it all worth it for the long run.


I do want to stress again, that Bunting is a 20 goal scorer 60 point player making a million. Why spend nearly 5 million for a guy to ride the coattails of our stars? We can find way better value than Garland.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll