A whole lot of nothing for two very good pieces. Would expect a 1st + for Jensen and a 2nd + for Sheary.

They’re expiring at not resigning how much do u want for a rental lol. Maybe a 1st

Jensen easily gets a 1st imo.
Sheary gets a 2nd. Maybe more he’s on a 28g pace

I’d rather try to extend Jensen though.

What rentals usually get???? Jensen would be theoretically the first or second best RD on the market (depending on your opinion of Klingberg), and Lindholm, Chiarot, Savard, have all gotten 1sts in recent deadlines and worse players such as Leddy last year got a second. Sheary is a .5ppg player who can play up and down the lineup at a super cheap cap hit, similar guys who got 2nds in recent years -- Rakell, Anthanasiou, Janmark.

Jensen will get Kulak kinda of deal and Sheary maybe a b prospect.

Leddy got a 2nd sunquist (spelled wrong)

Kulak had 13p in 56gp. Jensen has 9p in 16gp already this year. Basically a 46p pace. Curious to what logic you are using. Also RSD generally get more. Worse Dman have got 2nd +. Jensen is under rated by casual NHL ppl but GMs will have people who understand his underlying numbers are amazing

people love criminally underrating Jensen ...

Intelligent people know

Lets do this instead: Jensen + Sheary & Hathaway for Kerfoot 50%, Holl, a 1st & Toronto’s 2023 3rd & throw in Kressler or Abruzesse & Miettinen

I think they would try to see if they could get a bit more splitting everyone up, but definitely a serious offer if they are out of it by the deadline.