SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Rebuild

Created by: Hamcity
Team: 2022-23 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 14, 2022
Published: Nov. 14, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Didn’t go too much into detail regarding cap implications. Just meant to give my opinion as to who I believe the Canucks should trade to kick off this rebuild and what types of assets they should look for in return.
Trades
1.
VAN
  1. 2024 2nd round pick (TOR)
2.
VAN
  1. Harrison, Brett
  2. Smith, Craig
  3. 2023 1st round pick (BOS)
3.
VAN
  1. Sillinger, Cole
  2. 2024 1st round pick (CBJ)
4.
VAN
  1. Walsh, Reilly
  2. 2023 2nd round pick (NJD)
5.
VAN
  1. Matier, Jack
  2. 2023 3rd round pick (NSH)
6.
VAN
  1. 2024 4th round pick (CGY)
7.
VAN
  1. 2023 5th round pick (OTT)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the VAN
2024
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2025
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$59,906,667$1,250,000$2,165,000$22,593,333

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,750,000$4,750,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,350,000$7,350,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,650,000$6,650,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,100,000$3,100,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$762,500$762,500
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$883,750$883,750 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$883,750$883,750 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$825,000$825,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$762,500$762,500
RW, C
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,800,000$1,800,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,260,000$7,260,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$762,500$762,500
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$925,000$925,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,350,000$1,350,000
LD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Should the Canucks rebuild?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Nov. 14, 2022 at 1:00 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 1,515
Could have traded Miller two seasons ago for a nice haul, but it wasn't enough. Could have traded him last season for a nice haul, but it wasn't enough. So sign him to 7 more years and then try to trade him? Good luck with that.
Nov. 14, 2022 at 1:04 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 180
Likes: 52
Fun times to be a Canucks fan
Nov. 14, 2022 at 1:05 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 180
Likes: 52
Quoting: delneggs
Could have traded Miller two seasons ago for a nice haul, but it wasn't enough. Could have traded him last season for a nice haul, but it wasn't enough. So sign him to 7 more years and then try to trade him? Good luck with that.


I still think he has positive trade value, but I do agree the haul will be diminished from what it could have been. A first from Boston this year is likely to be practically a 2nd rounder with how good they’re are doing, so I figured that plus a Mid prospect is probably fair value
Nov. 14, 2022 at 1:05 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,605
Likes: 915
Schenn? worth a 2nd 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 In your dreams bud, Best he gets is a 4th, he is a 6/7 D on a good team with a solid D-core, Brodie & Lilly are ahead of him in TO so a 2nd for a rental is very generous & not likely
Nov. 14, 2022 at 1:08 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,605
Likes: 915
Quoting: Hamcity
I still think he has positive trade value, but I do agree the haul will be diminished from what it could have been. A first from Boston this year is likely to be practically a 2nd rounder with how good they’re are doing, so I figured that plus a Mid prospect is probably fair value


Whilst I agree with that, 8 x7 for a guy showing signs of regression isn’t what a GM is going to be too happy about, that deal makes it very difficult to trade without you taking a-lot of salary back Smith + Rielly or Foligno is what needs to be moved
Hamcity liked this.
Nov. 14, 2022 at 1:10 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 180
Likes: 52
Quoting: T0R
Schenn? worth a 2nd 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 In your dreams bud, Best he gets is a 4th, he is a 6/7 D on a good team with a solid D-core, Brodie & Lilly are ahead of him in TO so a 2nd for a rental is very generous & not likely


Maybe. Also maybe the leafs aren’t the best partner then. Schenn is a cup winner and has actually been playing very well despite the Canucks failures. I suspect the Canucks had many offers last year of similar value but elected to pass due to what Schenn brings in terms of experience/physicality/leadership on such a cheap contract. We’ll see what happens come this trade deadline!
Nov. 14, 2022 at 1:15 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 180
Likes: 52
Quoting: T0R
Whilst I agree with that, 8 x7 for a guy showing signs of regression isn’t what a GM is going to be too happy about, that deal makes it very difficult to trade without you taking a-lot of salary back Smith + Rielly or Foligno is what needs to be moved


As mentioned in the description the point wasn’t really to go too much into actual cap implications, although that’s why I added smith (who could have easily been swapped with foligno in this case). And I would argue Miller hasn’t actually started regressing, but that he’s been used improperly as a centre due to the Canucks roster construction issues. At wing he’s still dynamic, and is still a point per game player so far while being really good on the power play. A team going all in this season should be interested. I figured Boston might be, considering Bergeron/kreci should be retiring shortly and they are playing so well so far
Nov. 14, 2022 at 1:16 a.m.
#8
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,615
Likes: 17,624
Quoting: T0R
Schenn? worth a 2nd 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 In your dreams bud, Best he gets is a 4th, he is a 6/7 D on a good team with a solid D-core, Brodie & Lilly are ahead of him in TO so a 2nd for a rental is very generous & not likely


He has good leadership and grit which you guys seemingly paid a first round pick for when you acquired an already washed Nick Foligno

Edit: Nick Foligno had 16 points in 42 games the season he got traded. Schenn has 7 points in 16 and is on pace to put score Foligno. Schenn is a depth defenseman btw
WhereArtTLuongo and Hamcity liked this.
Nov. 14, 2022 at 1:17 a.m.
#9
Vancouerrific
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 1,052
Quoting: T0R
Schenn? worth a 2nd 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 In your dreams bud, Best he gets is a 4th, he is a 6/7 D on a good team with a solid D-core, Brodie & Lilly are ahead of him in TO so a 2nd for a rental is very generous & not likely


I agree that a 2nd is probably bit too rich but he easily worth a 3rd and another mid pick at least
Hamcity liked this.
Nov. 14, 2022 at 1:18 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 1,515
Quoting: Hamcity
I still think he has positive trade value, but I do agree the haul will be diminished from what it could have been. A first from Boston this year is likely to be practically a 2nd rounder with how good they’re are doing, so I figured that plus a Mid prospect is probably fair value


I disagree. No chance Boston, or any other team, takes him at $8/m per year for 7 more years, let alone add in more assets. JT is going to be in Vancouver throughout that contract or until they buy it out.
Nov. 14, 2022 at 1:19 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
Can’t see Columbus making that trade Horvat would be great, but he is a pending UFA and I can’t see them moving Sillinger.
Viqsi liked this.
Nov. 14, 2022 at 1:20 a.m.
#12
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,615
Likes: 17,624
Quoting: delneggs
I disagree. No chance Boston, or any other team, takes him at $8/m per year for 7 more years, let alone add in more assets. JT is going to be in Vancouver throughout that contract or until they buy it out.


Let’s be real. If he were a UFA this offseason, I guarantee you a GM would “overpay” for Miller. 8 mil for a point per game winger isn’t outrageous. With the cap going up, it’s not like he has an albatross contract right now
Hamcity liked this.
Nov. 14, 2022 at 1:20 a.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 180
Likes: 52
Quoting: WhereArtTLuongo
I agree that a 2nd is probably bit too rich but he easily worth a 3rd and another mid pick at least


That’s fair. We are in a similar ballpark value-wise anyways. I do think he brings a decent return considering what he brings while being on such a cheap contract. He’s essentially the perfect target for a contender with limited cap flexibility looking for defensive depth and leadership.
WhereArtTLuongo liked this.
Nov. 14, 2022 at 1:22 a.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 180
Likes: 52
Edited Nov. 14, 2022 at 1:35 a.m.
Quoting: Ajp_18
Can’t see Columbus making that trade Horvat would be great, but he is a pending UFA and I can’t see them moving Sillinger.


Ya maybe Sillinger was a bit too optimistic. But I heard rumours that non-playoff teams were interested so I took a stab at a trade with CBJ. Plus you can’t deny, a Gaudreau-Horvat-Laine line would be sick!
Nov. 14, 2022 at 1:25 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 1,515
Quoting: Juiceman
Let’s be real. If he were a UFA this offseason, I guarantee you a GM would “overpay” for Miller. 8 mil for a point per game winger isn’t outrageous. With the cap going up, it’s not like he has an albatross contract right now


Is JT a free agent? Um...no, he's not. So any GM that would hypothetically "overpay" for him if he was a UFA has no choice but to accept overpaying him for 7 years starting at age 30. Yeah, there are lots of GM's around the league dying to do that. His contract is fine for the first few years, but will absolutely be an albatross by year 3 or 4, and that's why Canuck fans are desperate to trade him. That's what is real.
Nov. 14, 2022 at 1:26 a.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 180
Likes: 52
Quoting: delneggs
I disagree. No chance Boston, or any other team, takes him at $8/m per year for 7 more years, let alone add in more assets. JT is going to be in Vancouver throughout that contract or until they buy it out.


Considering the free agents that get signed to similar deals every year, and the fact that there was so much interest in JT at last deadline, I don’t think his play so far has been bad enough to warrant the type of league-wide avoidance of his contract that your suggesting. I do think teams have realized however that he clearly can’t play centre at the same level as lw which decreases his value
Nov. 14, 2022 at 1:29 a.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 180
Likes: 52
Quoting: delneggs
Is JT a free agent? Um...no, he's not. So any GM that would hypothetically "overpay" for him if he was a UFA has no choice but to accept overpaying him for 7 years starting at age 30. Yeah, there are lots of GM's around the league dying to do that. His contract is fine for the first few years, but will absolutely be an albatross by year 3 or 4, and that's why Canuck fans are desperate to trade him. That's what is real.


Canucks fans want him and many others traded bc it’s time to rebuild, simple as that. Doesn’t mean he isn’t useful to a contender who’s only worried about winning now, not cap troubles later
Nov. 14, 2022 at 1:41 a.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 1,515
Quoting: Hamcity
Considering the free agents that get signed to similar deals every year, and the fact that there was so much interest in JT at last deadline, I don’t think his play so far has been bad enough to warrant the type of league-wide avoidance of his contract that your suggesting. I do think teams have realized however that he clearly can’t play centre at the same level as lw which decreases his value


Yeah, GM's get to decide what free agents they want, how much they want to pay them, and for how long they want to pay them. With JT, they don't have those choices, they have to take a 7 year deal starting next year at $8m/year. You really think its the same thing as if JT were just a UFA and GM's could negotiate with him? The truth is, Vancouver overplayed their hand with him the last two seasons and then signed him long term because they didn't know what else to do, and now they are stuck with his contract. You can theorize on here all you want, but let's see if he gets traded. I'll check back with you once a year for the next 7 years.
Nov. 14, 2022 at 1:45 a.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 1,515
Quoting: Hamcity
Canucks fans want him and many others traded bc it’s time to rebuild, simple as that. Doesn’t mean he isn’t useful to a contender who’s only worried about winning now, not cap troubles later


Lets just state this.......JT is a very, very good hockey player and every GM and coach in the NHL would be happy to have him on their team. That is a given. But, every GM has to manage the salary cap and that is where the problem with JT starts and ends. What GM wants to take on a 7-year contract that is an overpay by even Canuck fans estimations? On top of that, you expect that GM to throw in a 1st round draft pick and another player. It's absurd. Unless there is a GM out there that wants to lose his job, JT is going no where.
NJDevils1317 liked this.
Nov. 14, 2022 at 1:56 a.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
Quoting: Hamcity
Ya maybe Sillinger was a bit too optimistic. But I heard rumours that non-playoff teams were interested so I took a stab at a trade with CBJ. Plus you can’t deny, a Gaudreau-Horvat-Laine line would be sick!


I wouldn’t take non playoff team to mean the worst team in the league. It would be sick, but also likely they can’t afford it unless Horvat took a sweetheart extension where he was paid under 7 mil, so they could also fix the major defensive issues they currently have.
Hamcity and Viqsi liked this.
Nov. 14, 2022 at 4:07 a.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Hamcity
I still think he has positive trade value, but I do agree the haul will be diminished from what it could have been. A first from Boston this year is likely to be practically a 2nd rounder with how good they’re are doing, so I figured that plus a Mid prospect is probably fair value


But it isn’t a 2nd, it’s a 1st.
Nov. 14, 2022 at 5:39 a.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 402
Likes: 119
Quoting: T0R
Schenn? worth a 2nd 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 In your dreams bud, Best he gets is a 4th, he is a 6/7 D on a good team with a solid D-core, Brodie & Lilly are ahead of him in TO so a 2nd for a rental is very generous & not likely


Nucks get a 2nd for Schenn, book it. Save this comment.
Hamcity liked this.
Nov. 14, 2022 at 6:50 a.m.
#23
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: T0R
Schenn? worth a 2nd 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 In your dreams bud, Best he gets is a 4th, he is a 6/7 D on a good team with a solid D-core, Brodie & Lilly are ahead of him in TO so a 2nd for a rental is very generous & not likely


Holl is better than Schenn as well. Canuck fans think he's way better than he is because they legit have no RD.
Nov. 14, 2022 at 6:52 a.m.
#24
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: Turkish_Canuck
Nucks get a 2nd for Schenn, book it. Save this comment.


A guy who played the 7/8 defenceman on Tampa and has been sent to the minors by Vancouver and Tampa in recent years and is 32 is not worth a 2nd.
Nov. 14, 2022 at 6:53 a.m.
#25
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: Hamcity
Considering the free agents that get signed to similar deals every year, and the fact that there was so much interest in JT at last deadline, I don’t think his play so far has been bad enough to warrant the type of league-wide avoidance of his contract that your suggesting. I do think teams have realized however that he clearly can’t play centre at the same level as lw which decreases his value


Getting him last year at the deadline though offered terrific value, you get him for 2 playoff runs and then evaluate what to do. Now he comes with 7 years of term at the age of 30. That's major major risk and with how he looks this year, that risk is even greater.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit