SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

Leafs get a LW and D man

Created by: Footzah
Published: Nov. 17, 2022 at 1:44 p.m.
Salary Cap: $82,500,000
Season Days: 147/185 (79%)
Central Registry Determination: This trade has met the central registry's trade checklist

Logo of the Toronto Maple LeafsToronto Maple Leafs

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Holl, JustinToronto Maple LeafsNHL-$2,000,000011---17112--
Kerfoot, AlexanderToronto Maple LeafsNHL-$3,500,000011---17156--
Robertson, NicholasWaivers ExemptToronto Maple LeafsNHL-$796,667011---10235--
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Myers, TylerVancouver CanucksNHL50%$3,000,000011---14044--
Garland, ConorVancouver CanucksNHL-$4,950,000011---16369--
2023 3rd round pick (Logo of the Vancouver CanucksVAN)---010------
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$2,100,8332150693411
Change-$1,653,333-1-1-1010
Final$447,500 (↓)20 (↓)49 (↓)68 (↓)35 (↑)11-110

Logo of the Vancouver CanucksVancouver Canucks

Coincident TransactionInitial StatusNew StatusCap Hit ChangeRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Podkolzin, VasilyNHLMinor-$925,000-1-----------
OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Myers, TylerVancouver CanucksNHL50%$3,000,000011---14044--
Garland, ConorVancouver CanucksNHL-$4,950,000011---16369--
2023 3rd round pick (Logo of the Vancouver CanucksVAN)---010------
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Holl, JustinToronto Maple LeafsNHL-$2,000,000011---17112--
Kerfoot, AlexanderToronto Maple LeafsNHL-$3,500,000011---17156--
Robertson, NicholasWaivers ExemptToronto Maple LeafsNHL-$796,667011---10235--
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$927,0832347693511
Change$2,578,3330110-10
Final$3,505,416 (↑)2348 (↑)70 (↑)34 (↓)111-10
Nov. 17, 2022 at 2:34 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 3,313
Likes: 1,777
We want a dman who is good at hockey.
Nov. 17, 2022 at 3:03 p.m.
#2
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 4,055
Likes: 2,084
Quoting: Rhea
We want a dman who is good at hockey.


You would take this trade if Robertson was swapped for a lower prospect though because no good D man is affordable with your empty cabinets. We would do it too.
Nov. 17, 2022 at 3:10 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 9,655
Likes: 9,032
Canucks pass easily. Kerfoot and Holl add zero value for them, and Robertson isn’t enough for Garland + Myers retained + the pick
Knuckl3s liked this.
Nov. 17, 2022 at 6:59 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 3,313
Likes: 1,777
Quoting: reelkena
You would take this trade if Robertson was swapped for a lower prospect though because no good D man is affordable with your empty cabinets. We would do it too.


Nope he would offer nothing.
Nov. 17, 2022 at 7:58 p.m.
#5
Canucks sorta homer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 866
Canucks say no, this doesn't help for the future. They're likely looking to embrace a short rebuild. Myers has value on the market. Any RHD who has size and can be as cheap as 3m/yr is worth a lot.
Knuckl3s liked this.
Nov. 18, 2022 at 6:27 a.m.
#6
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Canucks wouldn't do this deal even if there was no retention on Myers
Nov. 19, 2022 at 1:05 a.m.
#7
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 4,055
Likes: 2,084
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Canucks wouldn't do this deal even if there was no retention on Myers


we would do that deal in 1 tenth of a second.
Nov. 19, 2022 at 4:55 a.m.
#8
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: reelkena
we would do that deal in 1 tenth of a second.


No they wouldn't
Nov. 19, 2022 at 1:05 p.m.
#9
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 4,055
Likes: 2,084
Quoting: Knuckl3s
No they wouldn't


I'm not gonna back and forth you like children. Everyone already knows our fanbase is bottom 5 for logic.
Nov. 20, 2022 at 3:09 a.m.
#10
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: reelkena
I'm not gonna back and forth you like children. Everyone already knows our fanbase is bottom 5 for logic.


There is no analytical evidence to support that type of objectivity
Nov. 21, 2022 at 2:08 a.m.
#11
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 4,055
Likes: 2,084
Quoting: Knuckl3s
There is no analytical evidence to support that type of objectivity


There's plenty of evidence to support posting 5 trades every day and getting ignored or disagreed with universally would probably mean you live in a world not inhabited by humans.
Nov. 30, 2022 at 4:39 a.m.
#12
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: reelkena
There's plenty of evidence to support posting 5 trades every day and getting ignored or disagreed with universally would probably mean you live in a world not inhabited by humans.


I don't get universally ignored or disagreed upon though, not a big enough feedback sample size to support that claim
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll