Quoting: yycofred
This is all so embarrassing for you. You are trying to point out how I am only talking about points? The only thing you’ve talked about in this thread is “Anderson was on pace for this many goals”. Analytics are for baseball.. and you know the 32 teams that are paying through the nose for top end analytics departments in hockey! Maybe instead of switching sports you should just drop the whole watching sports thing together, you clearly would rather think you’re right than learn a thing or two, I don’t know how deep the insecurity runs in other areas of your life but take small steps, start by getting better here today, it’s okay to be wrong. You’ve taken your lumps, time to move on.
Your first answer was : How come 23 points in 65 games for 1 season costs a first to move but 32 points in 69 games fir multiple years is worth a first?
My point is Anderson is way more than points. Teams need those potato and meat type of players.
I was only talking about goals because the other guy was arguing Anderson is not a 25 goals scorer, which he clearly is.
I'm the one trying to say Anderson is more than just points. You're the one saying he's bad because of his low point production.
You're right, all teams pay for analytics departments. However, that's just more info they get. Teams choose if they use it or not after. MTL had bad analytics when they reach SCF.
You still can't find when i said Anderson is worth a 1st because i feel like it? Maybe it's because i never said it, and you're making up stuff.
Again, i'll note your name, and when Anderson is traded for a 1st in term of value, we'll talk again. You probably won't answer just like the others who were wrong before you.