SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Leafs deadline option

Created by: Random2152
Team: 2022-23 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 19, 2022
Published: Nov. 19, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Read the trade desc before getting mad.

Ive seen Canucks fans moving Garland for as low as a 2nd and 3rd. Im offering voit (who is killing it right now and whose value is massively increasing, kerf whose value is down a bit from the off season but is versitile and hollowell who is a B prospect who could play 100 games maybe
Trades
VAN
  1. Hollowell, Mac
  2. Kerfoot, Alexander
  3. Voit, Ty
Additional Details:
Canucks can flip kerfoot (probably a 2nd of value ish these days) or keep him to fill in for a Bo trade

Im not interested in moving picks right now, so the Canucks get their pick of a prospect not named Knies, Niemela, or Amirov to go with Kerf. I put Voit in as a placeholder
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2024
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
2025
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$81,920,413$212,500$0$579,587
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,950,000$4,950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$950,000$950,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$827,500$827,500
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$840,630$840,630
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$7,500,000$7,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,687,500$4,687,500
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,400,000$1,400,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,800,000$1,800,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$796,667$796,667
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 19, 2022 at 7:01 p.m.
#1
Future GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 434
If I was Van I would take nothing but picks for Garland.
Nov. 19, 2022 at 7:02 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 9,439
Likes: 5,735
Quoting: FilthyMitts05
If I was Van I would take nothing but picks for Garland.


Picks are overrated honestly.
If they want picks kerfoot is basically a pick, and voit is who they hope that pick turns into anyway
Nov. 19, 2022 at 7:36 p.m.
#3
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 7,190
Likes: 3,654
Prettt easy decline for vancouver. Two meh prospects and a pending UFA for a top 6 winger with term
Nov. 19, 2022 at 8:03 p.m.
#4
Smythe.over.Hart
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 3,035
Likes: 2,350
I think Van would decline. But to the OP 100% I too have seen fan posts trading Garland being traded for next to nothing. Why? I honestly don’t know.
Nov. 19, 2022 at 8:08 p.m.
#5
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: The_Rocket
Prettt easy decline for vancouver. Two meh prospects and a pending UFA for a top 6 winger with term


Two 50 point wingers and one that can play centre but the more versatile one makes 3.5 million less. Yeah that term makes it seem worse. Keep Garland.
Nov. 19, 2022 at 8:26 p.m.
#6
PDG over PDO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 5,234
Likes: 4,214
Canucks pass easily
Nov. 19, 2022 at 8:57 p.m.
#7
Kster
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 359
Garland’s over rated
Nov. 19, 2022 at 9:29 p.m.
#8
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,618
Likes: 17,643
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Two 50 point wingers and one that can play centre but the more versatile one makes 3.5 million less. Yeah that term makes it seem worse. Keep Garland.


One of them is a pending UFA, one of them has 4 years of cost certainty
Warpbox liked this.
Nov. 19, 2022 at 9:33 p.m.
#9
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: Juiceman
One of them is a pending UFA, one of them has 4 years of cost certainty


But is he worth 5 million? He just doesn't offer anything I think the Leafs need and he costs more than the guys who do the things he does (whether or not he's better all of them, he's not better than all of them combined.). There are way better adds than Garland and won't come with an overpriced contract for 4 more years. You can spend 5 million way better than Garland.
Nov. 19, 2022 at 9:36 p.m.
#10
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,618
Likes: 17,643
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
But is he worth 5 million? He just doesn't offer anything I think the Leafs need and he costs more than the guys who do the things he does (whether or not he's better all of them, he's not better than all of them combined.). There are way better adds than Garland and won't come with an overpriced contract for 4 more years. You can spend 5 million way better than Garland.


If the Leafs don’t want him then that’s fine, doesn’t mean the Canucks have to get rid of him
Warpbox liked this.
Nov. 19, 2022 at 9:41 p.m.
#11
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: Juiceman
If the Leafs don’t want him then that’s fine, doesn’t mean the Canucks have to get rid of him


I think you guys need to really be honest with yourselves. You are not close. I would move on from pretty much everyone but Petterson, Hughes and Demko. Get a real coach and have a patient rebuild. Bottom out, get a tonne of picks and hope you can see a huge wave of young players 3-4 years from now. With the veterans Hughes and Petterson at the helm.
Nov. 19, 2022 at 9:42 p.m.
#12
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,618
Likes: 17,643
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
I think you guys need to really be honest with yourselves. You are not close. I would move on from pretty much everyone but Petterson, Hughes and Demko. Get a real coach and have a patient rebuild. Bottom out, get a tonne of picks and hope you can see a huge wave of young players 3-4 years from now. With the veterans Hughes and Petterson at the helm.


A rebuild takes several years. I am onboard with that. The thing is, we don't need to trade everybody this year. Garland has 4 years left. The smartest move would be to wait until the winger market goes back up again instead of trading him for pennies. I wish the Canucks traded Miller because that would have sped up the process. Horvat is basically our only big trade chip. Perhaps Demko if we go full tank mode
Warpbox liked this.
Nov. 19, 2022 at 10:10 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 9,439
Likes: 5,735
Quoting: The_Rocket
Prettt easy decline for vancouver. Two meh prospects and a pending UFA for a top 6 winger with term


Meh? I don't think you know who Voit is - also read better next time he is a placeholder as an option.

Kerf would either be signed or flipped. Again read better
Nov. 19, 2022 at 10:13 p.m.
#14
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: Juiceman
A rebuild takes several years. I am onboard with that. The thing is, we don't need to trade everybody this year. Garland has 4 years left. The smartest move would be to wait until the winger market goes back up again instead of trading him for pennies. I wish the Canucks traded Miller because that would have sped up the process. Horvat is basically our only big trade chip. Perhaps Demko if we go full tank mode


I would tank for sure. Otherwise it'll be the same thing over and over again. A year where you look better than you are and then another fall. Rebuild properly or be doomed to repeat the same cycle over and over again.
Nov. 19, 2022 at 10:15 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 9,439
Likes: 5,735
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
I would tank for sure. Otherwise it'll be the same thing over and over again. A year where you look better than you are and then another fall. Rebuild properly or be doomed to repeat the same cycle over and over again.


Even if they dont blow it up selling high on Horvat makes sense here. But they were too stupid to do it for Miller with 1.5 years left so who knows
Logan_Ollivier liked this.
Nov. 19, 2022 at 10:26 p.m.
#16
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 7,190
Likes: 3,654
Quoting: Random2152
Meh? I don't think you know who Voit is - also read better next time he is a placeholder as an option.

Kerf would either be signed or flipped. Again read better


Read better? What are you talking about? If the Canucks want picks why wouldn’t they just trade garland for picks instead of acquiring an older asset and flipping him? Makes 0 sense. Plus, Kerfoot is not worth a 2nd, maybe a 3rd but more likely a 4th

And yeah, the D+2 OHL playmaker is meh. You’re overhyping him and his 6 goals
Nov. 20, 2022 at 1:36 a.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 9,439
Likes: 5,735
Quoting: The_Rocket
Read better? What are you talking about? If the Canucks want picks why wouldn’t they just trade garland for picks instead of acquiring an older asset and flipping him? Makes 0 sense. Plus, Kerfoot is not worth a 2nd, maybe a 3rd but more likely a 4th

And yeah, the D+2 OHL playmaker is meh. You’re overhyping him and his 6 goals


Yeah, im not even gonna bother with this one
The_Rocket liked this.
Nov. 20, 2022 at 10:08 a.m.
#18
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 7,190
Likes: 3,654
Quoting: Random2152
Yeah, im not even gonna bother with this one


Very cool
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll