SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Nylander

Created by: DDCRAVEN
Team: 2022-23 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 28, 2022
Published: Nov. 28, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Any chance something like this could happen? I know Chicago is rebuilding, but they have tons of draft picks and maybe want someone else they can build around?
Trades
TOR
  1. Domi, Max
  2. Kane, Patrick ($5,000,000 retained)
  3. Murphy, Connor ($2,200,000 retained)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2024
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
2025
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$67,683,047$212,500$0$14,816,953
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$950,000$950,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
-$2,375,000-$2,375,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$796,667$796,667
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$827,500$827,500
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$840,630$840,630
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,200,000$2,200,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,687,500$4,687,500
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,400,000$1,400,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$850,000$850,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$7,500,000$7,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,800,000$1,800,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 28, 2022 at 5:20 p.m.
#51
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 8,566
Likes: 3,319
Quoting: ChiHawk
Let's pretend both Nylander and Kane are on expiring deals this year, same cap hits, no NMC/NTCs in their agreements, I'm willing 100% of GMs that would be in on them would take Kane over Nylander for a playoff run. That said, with Nylander having an extra year, smaller cap hit, that does for sure hold more value to an acquiring team. I also agree that to the Leafs Nylander is more valuable today; you can't just shake up the chemistry of the team.


I wouldn't say 100% of GMs, but probably 90-95% would take Kane over Nylander if they are being brought in as a pure rental.
ChiHawk liked this.
Nov. 28, 2022 at 5:40 p.m.
#52
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 9,223
Likes: 5,586
Quoting: ChiHawk
Try watching the Hawks game in and game out...90%+ like those in the know; watch what he still does on the ice next to crappy line mates and you might begin to understand what doesn't show up on stat sheets how he creates chances that simply line mates aren't good enough to capitalize on. And if you're a stathead because you don't watch the Hawks much, which is likely what you are forming your opinion on, explain this...

Points per game
18/19 = 1.36
19/20 = 1.20
15/16 = 1.29
21/22 = 1.18
20/21 = 1.18
16/17 = 1.08....6th best year for reference

16 years in the NHL and his 5 best ppg seasons, 4 of them happened in the last 4 seasons, his 2nd best season ever was just 2 years ago. Yeah....Kane is in deep decline for years like you said LMAO laugh

If Kane and Nylander were both rentals this year and available at the deadline to playoff teams this season for equal price and any playoff team could take 1 or the other, every GM would take Kane in a heartbeat for one playoff run. You clearly don't watch Kane play night in and night out.


Take your head out of the box score and watch the games and look at the results.

Besides a lot of kanes production is just from the copious amount of PP time he gets.
His p/60 is in the hundreds among nhlers and his g/60 is terrible too.
Nov. 28, 2022 at 5:53 p.m.
#53
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,026
Likes: 9,322
Quoting: Random2152
Take your head out of the box score and watch the games and look at the results.

Besides a lot of kanes production is just from the copious amount of PP time he gets.
His p/60 is in the hundreds among nhlers and his g/60 is terrible too.


LMAO you made an asinine statement and the more you respond arguing the worse it gets for you. Kane has always had a ton of time on the PP and in the offensive zone...nothing new. In fact, he never attempted to play defense up until a few years ago when forced to. Try watching Hawks games, more then a few a year and you'll get it.

Done trying to talk sense to the ignorant...good day kid
Nov. 28, 2022 at 5:55 p.m.
#54
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 9,223
Likes: 5,586
Quoting: ChiHawk
LMAO you made an asinine statement and the more you respond arguing the worse it gets for you. Kane has always had a ton of time on the PP and in the offensive zone...nothing new. In fact, he never attempted to play defense up until a few years ago when forced to. Try watching Hawks games, more then a few a year and you'll get it.

Done trying to talk sense to the ignorant...good day kid


He had never tried to play D and has gotten worse at it, but his EV scoring is gone too now.

Textbook decline. Im sorry you cant recognize that
Nov. 28, 2022 at 5:56 p.m.
#55
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 9,223
Likes: 5,586
Quoting: ChiHawk
LMAO you made an asinine statement and the more you respond arguing the worse it gets for you. Kane has always had a ton of time on the PP and in the offensive zone...nothing new. In fact, he never attempted to play defense up until a few years ago when forced to. Try watching Hawks games, more then a few a year and you'll get it.

Done trying to talk sense to the ignorant...good day kid


This is your king? Hasnt declined my ass


Nov. 28, 2022 at 6:07 p.m.
#56
Seiders on the Storm
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 9,890
Likes: 7,764
Quoting: ChiHawk
Try watching the Hawks game in and game out...90%+ like those in the know; watch what he still does on the ice next to crappy line mates and you might begin to understand what doesn't show up on stat sheets how he creates chances that simply line mates aren't good enough to capitalize on. And if you're a stathead because you don't watch the Hawks much, which is likely what you are forming your opinion on, explain this...

Points per game
18/19 = 1.36
19/20 = 1.20
15/16 = 1.29
21/22 = 1.18
20/21 = 1.18
16/17 = 1.08....6th best year for reference

16 years in the NHL and his 5 best ppg seasons, 4 of them happened in the last 4 seasons, his 2nd best season ever was just 2 years ago. Yeah....Kane is in deep decline for years like you said LMAO laugh

If Kane and Nylander were both rentals this year and available at the deadline to playoff teams this season for equal price and any playoff team could take 1 or the other, every GM would take Kane in a heartbeat for one playoff run. You clearly don't watch Kane play night in and night out.


Kane isn't what he once was but he's still an excellent player.
Nov. 28, 2022 at 6:08 p.m.
#57
Seiders on the Storm
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 9,890
Likes: 7,764
Quoting: ChiHawk
LMAO you made an asinine statement and the more you respond arguing the worse it gets for you. Kane has always had a ton of time on the PP and in the offensive zone...nothing new. In fact, he never attempted to play defense up until a few years ago when forced to. Try watching Hawks games, more then a few a year and you'll get it.

Done trying to talk sense to the ignorant...good day kid


Ignore the troll. It takes him an hour and a half to watch 60 minutes. He thinks Matthews' slow start is saving the Leafs money.
ChiHawk and DDCRAVEN liked this.
Nov. 28, 2022 at 6:44 p.m.
#58
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,026
Likes: 9,322
Quoting: MoreHitzSeider
Ignore the troll. It takes him an hour and a half to watch 60 minutes. He thinks Matthews' slow start is saving the Leafs money.


laugh He's on my ignore list after his last comment about Kane declining for years...literally one of the most ignorant statements I've seen on here
Nov. 29, 2022 at 11:18 a.m.
#59
Analytics are good
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 3,604
Likes: 962
Quoting: DDCRAVEN
The hope would be to resign Kane to continue to play with Matthews. The US connection.


There is absolutely 0% chance the Leafs could afford to keep Matthews and Kane.
ChiHawk liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll