SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Who says no

Created by: The_Rocket
Team: 2022-23 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 10, 2022
Published: Dec. 10, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the VAN
2024
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2025
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$81,975,917$1,250,000$1,232,500$524,083
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,650,000$6,650,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,750,000$4,750,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,950,000$4,950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$762,500$762,500
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$883,750$883,750 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$825,000$825,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$762,500$762,500
C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$762,500$762,500
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,260,000$7,260,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,800,000$1,800,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,350,000$1,350,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Dec. 10, 2022 at 1:27 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2016
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 1,228
The Canucks say no.
Nighthawk, GMBL, GMBL and 3 others liked this.
Dec. 10, 2022 at 1:28 a.m.
#2
2018 Canucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 2,172
Likes: 747
Quoting: audiodave
The Canucks say no.


2nd that. Unnecessary & no gain.
Knuckl3s liked this.
Dec. 10, 2022 at 1:29 a.m.
#3
PDG over PDO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 4,977
Likes: 4,046
Vancouver easily
Knuckl3s liked this.
Dec. 10, 2022 at 1:30 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 992
Vancouver. Pettersson is out producing marner and plays the much more valuable position, why do this?
Knuckl3s liked this.
Dec. 10, 2022 at 1:30 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 3,179
Likes: 1,068
Canucks keep the younger, cheaper player and the center.
GMBL and Knuckl3s liked this.
Dec. 10, 2022 at 1:32 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,288
Likes: 4,398
Vancouver obviously, but it's also possible the Leafs would say no as well.
GMBL, majormoose007 and Mediumyeet liked this.
Dec. 10, 2022 at 1:43 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 8,566
Likes: 3,319
Edited Dec. 10, 2022 at 2:14 a.m.
The Canucks probably say no just because Pettersen is a C (although he's not that great in the circle) even if they viewed Marner as the better player now. In my eyes, they should technically just be able to put Horvat + Miller down the middle. There is the possibility of turning Marner into a C too. Either way, they would still have trouble signing Horvat, with Marner's contract, and therefore it's not really viable. Petterson also has the better shot from the too.

The Leafs might be tempted by the lower cap hit, but they probably decline since Marner is important in the locker room and the chemistry that he has with the players in the Leafs top 6. He also has a better track record, and they definitely view him as the better player.

They both can play PK and PP, so nothing is lost in terms of roles, although I think they have different roles on the PP. The same amount of team control, except Petterson can be signed as an RFA and he's a year younger. Their next contracts are probably going to be similar in AAV.

Both teams say no.
Dec. 10, 2022 at 1:44 a.m.
#8
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 28,478
Likes: 11,075
Vancouver. If they had the same AAV and expiry status, maybe there's an argument. As things stand, a really easy call.
majormoose007 and Knuckl3s liked this.
Dec. 10, 2022 at 1:46 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 1,508
Likes: 1,054
Vancouver says no. Pettersson is cheaper and plays a more valuable position. Canucks also already have a surplus of wingers and a weakness in centre depth, the last thing they need is to move a centre for another winger.
majormoose007 and Knuckl3s liked this.
Dec. 10, 2022 at 1:54 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 8,566
Likes: 3,319
Quoting: Yotes269
Vancouver. Pettersson is out producing marner and plays the much more valuable position, why do this?


Vancouver doesn't do it, but Pettersen is hardly out-producing Marner. Pettersen only has 1 more point, although he has played one less game.
Dec. 10, 2022 at 2:20 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 992
Quoting: GMBL
Vancouver doesn't do it, but Pettersen is hardly out-producing Marner. Pettersen only has 1 more point, although he has played one less game.


I mean it’s just a true statement. With marner’s point streak I assumed he’d be comfortably ahead making this a more interesting question, but he’s not which makes the whole thing moot
Dec. 10, 2022 at 2:45 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 8,566
Likes: 3,319
Quoting: Yotes269
I mean it’s just a true statement. With marner’s point streak I assumed he’d be comfortably ahead making this a more interesting question, but he’s not which makes the whole thing moot


It is a true statement but if we were being precise Pettersson is slightly out producing Marner.

If Marner continues his streak for an extended period, he could end up getting ahead by a comfortable amount. However, Pettersson currently has a 3-game streak himself and is getting them in bunches

My point though was that mentioning production on the season was a moot point as you said now, since in any given day the one who is leading could change.
Dec. 10, 2022 at 3:03 a.m.
#13
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 598
Likes: 97
Easily Vancouver, They have the Cheaper player who has more points in less games, is younger, plays a more important position and most importantly doesn't choke in the playoffs
Knuckl3s liked this.
Dec. 10, 2022 at 6:47 a.m.
#14
Kster
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 359
Ridiculous, Marner is a top 10 player in the league. Peterson in top 50, May crack top 25 one day.
Not even close tears of joy tears of joy tears of joy
Canucks can keep the younger cheaper player and enjoy draft lotteries squinty smile
Logan_Ollivier liked this.
Dec. 10, 2022 at 7:08 a.m.
#15
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: TJTwolf
Vancouver obviously, but it's also possible the Leafs would say no as well.


Leafs would only be kidding themselves if they said no
Dec. 10, 2022 at 7:09 a.m.
#16
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
The positional difference truly is the tiebreaker here
Dec. 10, 2022 at 10:48 a.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,917
Likes: 3,575
Quoting: kster34
Keep on deluding yourself squinty smile ; Canuckle fans are the experts in delusion tears of joy tears of joy .
Not in a million years would Leafs ever trade Marner for Peterson; really really off the scale ridiculous imo. Position value is overrated - Marner is by far the better player, everything else is noise.


What is Marner better at than Pettersson?
Knuckl3s liked this.
Dec. 10, 2022 at 11:20 a.m.
#18
Kster
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 359
Edited Dec. 10, 2022 at 11:31 a.m.
Quoting: The_Rocket
What is Marner better at than Pettersson?


Without sounding controversial, - because Peterson is a good player- Marner is a top 10 player (top 15 at worst) - and he’s better at pretty much everything only exception goals.
Production (career ppg) - Marner 1.07 vs Pet 0.937
Playmaking (primary assists last year & this) - Marner 36, 11 vs Pet 20,10
Goals - Marner 0.327 gpg career, 11 this year vs Pet 0.4, 13
Marner is an elite PK, I don’t watch the Canucks that often so maybe pet is? Don’t know which advanced stat can prove who is better?
All the advanced stats I can access indicate Marner is superior in every metric - xgf%, hdcf%, etc.
Marner is a two time first team nhl all star. I can’t see Paterson ever making even 3rd team nhl all star in his entire career, but 🤷. But we do know he has not come close to that level yet.

I get the whole position argument centre > dman > winger but it’s overplayed imo. subjectively speaking - in the last decade at least 3 wingers are top 10 - Ovie, PK88 & Kuch. They were more valuable than 99.9% of centres that were their peers. In current day - I’d place Kuch, Marchand, Panarin, Marner & Kaprizov in top 15 players in league. Peterson might fit somewhere between 30-50?
TJTwolf liked this.
Dec. 10, 2022 at 1:05 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,917
Likes: 3,575
Quoting: kster34

Marner is an elite PK, I don’t watch the Canucks that often so maybe pet is? Don’t know which advanced stat can prove who is better?


That’s all you had to say
Knuckl3s liked this.
Dec. 10, 2022 at 1:18 p.m.
#20
Kster
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 359
Quoting: The_Rocket
That’s all you had to say


Uhh no - that’s not all I had to say. Marner has better defensive (& offensive) metrics but I don’t know how / where to specifically access pk data. What is your point?
Dec. 10, 2022 at 1:32 p.m.
#21
Kster
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 359
Quoting: The_Rocket
That’s all you had to say


Quoting: kster34
Uhh no - that’s not all I had to say. Marner has better defensive (& offensive) metrics but I don’t know how / where to specifically access pk data. What is your point?


Wait natural stattrick lets you compare players, 5v5 or pp or pk - great site for advanced metrics.
This year & last Marner for the most part has the better numbers (CF%, FF%, HDCF%) xGA% is the same. Marner has also played >2x the minutes on PK
Dec. 10, 2022 at 5:40 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,288
Likes: 4,398
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Leafs would only be kidding themselves if they said no


I would disagree....team needs and all that.
Dec. 13, 2022 at 4:37 a.m.
#23
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: TJTwolf
I would disagree....team needs and all that.


Centers are more valuable than wingers, facts only
Dec. 13, 2022 at 4:41 a.m.
#24
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: kster34
Wait natural stattrick lets you compare players, 5v5 or pp or pk - great site for advanced metrics.
This year & last Marner for the most part has the better numbers (CF%, FF%, HDCF%) xGA% is the same. Marner has also played >2x the minutes on PK


You haven't listed any of Pettersson's stats, sounds like you're afraid to make a comparison
Dec. 13, 2022 at 6:27 a.m.
#25
Kster
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 359
Quoting: Knuckl3s
You haven't listed any of Pettersson's stats, sounds like you're afraid to make a comparison


Go look them up yourself; take a break from dreaming about how good Petey (or Bo or Kuzmenko) are tears of joy. Last year it was Miller and Demko and Hoglander tears of joy . It’s not healthy to live in a world of perpetual make believe - you canuckle fans need some splashes of reality once in a while. The truth can set you free
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll