Engvall and Kampf go hand in hand and won't be separated. The two of them have great numbers together but are utterly useless (mainly Engvall) when not paired together. I can't see them being split up.

I just feel like ZAR andHunt are the players Toronto got for the specific thing Kampf excels at so it makes no sense not to have all 3 on a line. I get the Kampf and Engvall connection though, but I think Engvall would get that with Holmberg also.

I could also see going:
Kerfoot - Holmberg - ZAR
Hunt - Kampf - Engvall

I just don't think ZAR with Holmberg makes much sense since you would want that line providing bottom 6 offense.

Line 3 = Bottom 6 Offense.
Line 4 = Bottom 6 Defense.

Yeah I can see them moving the bottom 6 lines around a bit, but ZAR is and always has been a purely defensive player with poor offensive production so I can't help feeling that he wouldn't be the best fit with Kerf and Holmberg if that's supposed to be a scoring support line. While Hunt hasn't produced in the NHL he did have great numbers in junior, so he does have some finishing touch capabilities. Could make a bit more sense with Kerf than ZAR. I think Kerfoot gets moved before the year is done, though, since he's an UFA and we can use the cap space.

That's why I don't like ZAR with Holmberg. Holmberg can create offensive chances but when he's on a line with ZAR and Hunt, they don't really finish anything.

I pairing like:
Kerfoot - Holmberg - Hunt
ZAR - Kampf - Engvall

Could also work. I just think after some time together, Hunt would be great with Kampf.