SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

For BUF fans that want to trade Mitts andor Olofsson

Created by: worldwidesensei
Team: 2022-23 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 13, 2023
Published: Jan. 13, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Lots of BUF fans want to trade away Mitts and Olofsson. But most posts here want 2nd round picks back in return, which have almost zero value. Here is a trade where we get proper value for the 2 talented players.

Why BUF trades:
Add proven vets that have over 100+ games in the playoffs, that have contracts that will not block the prospects that should be coming up in the next 3 years and creates a F spot for Savoie next year if he doesn't stay in juniors. They add a solid D-man that can help their young D-men develop. He can play on the 2nd or 3rd pair, solidifying their D.

Why NSH might do this trade:
From an outsider's point of view, NSH is a team that is going nowhere, slowly. They shed a significant amount of cap space in this deal, which they can use to add more pieces. Mitts and Olofsson can contribute offensively and help the PP tremendously and they often play on a line together, so if NSH can find someone that meshes with these 2, it will be a formidable line. Both players are cost-controlled and NSH can just as easily ship them out for draft picks or different players. Finding suitors for Duchene and Ekholm won't be easy for NSH given their AAV and contract length. Here they get rid of both in one fell swoop and get much younger in the process.

** If NSH wants a D-man in return, BUF would send you Bryson for a 3rd in this deal. **
Trades
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2024
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2025
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$82,500,000$69,301,667$0$3,620,000$13,198,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,400,000$1,400,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,750,000$4,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$855,833$855,833 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW, RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$412,500$412K)
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$8,000,000$8,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,200,000$2,200,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$825,000$825,000
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,700,000$1,700,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,800,000$1,800,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$925,000$925K)
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,500,000$1,500,000 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$687,500$687,500
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$837,500$837,500
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,850,000$1,850,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,916,667$4,916,667
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 13, 2023 at 2:11 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 5,944
Likes: 6,540
Nashville dies from laughter
Jan. 13, 2023 at 2:26 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2022
Posts: 5,645
Likes: 3,583
noooo…
Just_A_Guess and gretzkyghosts liked this.
Jan. 13, 2023 at 2:44 a.m.
#3
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,609
Likes: 9,207
Why would Nashville do this. If they rebuild they can get a handful of decent picks for those 2
Jan. 13, 2023 at 3:18 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 800
Quoting: Shibbal18
Why would Nashville do this. If they rebuild they can get a handful of decent picks for those 2


I put in the description why. But I'll elaborate.

1. Which NHL teams can A) Afford these players? B) And if they can afford them, want them?

There won't be many suitors for these players.

2. They get a ton of cap space and a young C coming into his own and one of the top goal scorers in the league.

I don't really envision NSH as a tear-it-all-down type of team. They get players now in Mitts and Oloffson and cap space to pull off other moves.


But, I'll ask you and NSH fans. What would you expect from these players if you are trading them and what teams can pull off such a move?
Jan. 13, 2023 at 4:16 a.m.
#5
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 30,110
Likes: 11,608
Hmm. A couple of notes...

- The Sabres have selected Peterka, Samuelsson, UPL, Asplund, Compher, McCabe as 2nd rounders over the past decade. Hell, Olofsson was a 7th rounder. IJS.

- Speaking of Olofsson, in what world is he "one of the top goal scorers in the league"? Coz it sure ain't this one.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Jan. 13, 2023 at 4:49 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 800
Quoting: mokumboi
Hmm. A couple of notes...

- The Sabres have selected Peterka, Samuelsson, UPL, Asplund, Compher, McCabe as 2nd rounders over the past decade. Hell, Olofsson was a 7th rounder. IJS.

- Speaking of Olofsson, in what world is he "one of the top goal scorers in the league"? Coz it sure ain't this one.


Olofsson's tied for t-48th in the league in goals and 25th in G/60. He would be 2nd in goals on NSH. Forsberg 17, Olofsson 16.

Samuelsson - 32nd (that's 1st round now)
Asplund - 33rd
Peterka- 34th
Compher - 35th

happy Those guys are basically 1st rounders. If you're trading Mitts or Olofsson for a top-35 pick, you might be able to persuade me they have value.

McCabe - 44
UPL -54

So, you listed 6 guys, 4 of whom are basically players who fell out of the 1st round. But, let's go with 6. 6/13 picks made it. Those aren't great odds, and the odds are only that good because 4 of them are top-35. 2nd rounders have basically a 25% chance of making it in the NHL. Mitts and Olofsson have a 100% chance of making it.
Jan. 13, 2023 at 5:04 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 800
Quoting: SociallyHawkward
Nashville dies from laughter


Care to explain why? They are a fringe playoff team that will lose in the 1st round if they even make it. On top of that, they have no cap space to even try to improve a team that's already not good enough.

Duchene 11G 21A 32Pts 32yo and signed for 3 more seasons at $8,000,000 = $250,000/ per point
Mitts 7G 17A 24Pts 24yo and signed at $2,500,000 through next season and still an RFA = $52,000 per point

Mitts is improving, while Duchene is aging. Their production is very similar already and NSH saves $5,5mm on the cap.

Olofsson 16G 6A 22pts signed through next year at $4.75mm
Ekholm 4G 11A 15 Pts 32 yrs old, signed for 3 more years at $6.25mm

Not comparing these two players, but just showing the $1.5mm in savings to get someone who would be 1st or 2nd on the team in goals at the end of the year. NSH is 27th in the league in GF. They can absorb a hit on D for more goal-scoring with Jaros.

NSH gets $7mm in immediate cap space. That's not nothing. Then an additional $4.75mm if they want to ship out Olofsson instead of re-signing him. That's $11.75mm.

They can actually go out and try to improve their team while making basically an even swap on paper (when considering the decline in play for 33 year olds and the fact they are signed for 3 more years). NSH can take some handcuffs off and go and add more talent.

Looking at cap space around the league, only BUF, DET, CHI, ANA, ARI could even fit one of these contracts.

It's a trade NSH should consider and maybe there is a little tinkering involved with prospects, but I don't know who would make them a better offer. Or, they could just stay stuck in neutral.
Jan. 13, 2023 at 6:49 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 5,781
Likes: 4,811
Quoting: worldwidesensei
Care to explain why? They are a fringe playoff team that will lose in the 1st round if they even make it. On top of that, they have no cap space to even try to improve a team that's already not good enough.

Duchene 11G 21A 32Pts 32yo and signed for 3 more seasons at $8,000,000 = $250,000/ per point
Mitts 7G 17A 24Pts 24yo and signed at $2,500,000 through next season and still an RFA = $52,000 per point

Mitts is improving, while Duchene is aging. Their production is very similar already and NSH saves $5,5mm on the cap.

Olofsson 16G 6A 22pts signed through next year at $4.75mm
Ekholm 4G 11A 15 Pts 32 yrs old, signed for 3 more years at $6.25mm

Not comparing these two players, but just showing the $1.5mm in savings to get someone who would be 1st or 2nd on the team in goals at the end of the year. NSH is 27th in the league in GF. They can absorb a hit on D for more goal-scoring with Jaros.

NSH gets $7mm in immediate cap space. That's not nothing. Then an additional $4.75mm if they want to ship out Olofsson instead of re-signing him. That's $11.75mm.

They can actually go out and try to improve their team while making basically an even swap on paper (when considering the decline in play for 33 year olds and the fact they are signed for 3 more years). NSH can take some handcuffs off and go and add more talent.

Looking at cap space around the league, only BUF, DET, CHI, ANA, ARI could even fit one of these contracts.

It's a trade NSH should consider and maybe there is a little tinkering involved with prospects, but I don't know who would make them a better offer. Or, they could just stay stuck in neutral.


Can't see Buffalo doing it, lots of money coming Buffalo's way in 2yrs. Maybe 1 of them, and I doubt it would be Duchene. Sabres have cap space but they do have big extensions coming to Dahlin Cozens and maybe even Power.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Jan. 13, 2023 at 6:58 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 5,260
Likes: 3,486
My guy, no. This trade proposal is horrendous value for NSH.

Jokiharju + Olofsson for Ekholm may be a conversation starter but this proposal you have here is deplorable. Mitts + Olofsson for Ekholm could even be a conversation starter in the right realm of the world, but to think we'll take this proposal on the chin and be happy about it? C'mon man...
mokumboi liked this.
Jan. 13, 2023 at 6:58 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 5,260
Likes: 3,486
Double posted on accident...
Jan. 13, 2023 at 9:06 a.m.
#11
Lets go Preds
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 2,014
Likes: 992
Quoting: worldwidesensei
Care to explain why? They are a fringe playoff team that will lose in the 1st round if they even make it. On top of that, they have no cap space to even try to improve a team that's already not good enough.

Duchene 11G 21A 32Pts 32yo and signed for 3 more seasons at $8,000,000 = $250,000/ per point
Mitts 7G 17A 24Pts 24yo and signed at $2,500,000 through next season and still an RFA = $52,000 per point

Mitts is improving, while Duchene is aging. Their production is very similar already and NSH saves $5,5mm on the cap.

Olofsson 16G 6A 22pts signed through next year at $4.75mm
Ekholm 4G 11A 15 Pts 32 yrs old, signed for 3 more years at $6.25mm

Not comparing these two players, but just showing the $1.5mm in savings to get someone who would be 1st or 2nd on the team in goals at the end of the year. NSH is 27th in the league in GF. They can absorb a hit on D for more goal-scoring with Jaros.

NSH gets $7mm in immediate cap space. That's not nothing. Then an additional $4.75mm if they want to ship out Olofsson instead of re-signing him. That's $11.75mm.

They can actually go out and try to improve their team while making basically an even swap on paper (when considering the decline in play for 33 year olds and the fact they are signed for 3 more years). NSH can take some handcuffs off and go and add more talent.

Looking at cap space around the league, only BUF, DET, CHI, ANA, ARI could even fit one of these contracts.

It's a trade NSH should consider and maybe there is a little tinkering involved with prospects, but I don't know who would make them a better offer. Or, they could just stay stuck in neutral.


Or if Nashville is dead set on selling these 2 players they could do it separately. Ekholm will bring back a 1st and a good prospect if not more if we were to take back a dump and duchene would bring back something good if Poile were to retain a couple million. Ekholm and duchene still have value and you’re treating them like cap dumps
mokumboi and gretzkyghosts liked this.
Jan. 13, 2023 at 10:29 a.m.
#12
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 30,110
Likes: 11,608
Quoting: worldwidesensei
Olofsson's tied for t-48th in the league in goals and 25th in G/60. He would be 2nd in goals on NSH. Forsberg 17, Olofsson 16.


Okaaaay. And? Exactly none of that would make him "one of the top goal scorers in the league" even if you weren't cherry picking one half season out of four.
SociallyHawkward liked this.
Jan. 13, 2023 at 1:51 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 800
Quoting: mokumboi
Okaaaay. And? Exactly none of that would make him "one of the top goal scorers in the league" even if you weren't cherry picking one half season out of four.


The' t' stands for "top". I'm not cherry-picking anything. I'm talking about the present, man. There are 96 forwards on the top line. He scores more goals than half of them.
Jan. 13, 2023 at 1:55 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 800
Quoting: GeauxPreds1
Or if Nashville is dead set on selling these 2 players they could do it separately. Ekholm will bring back a 1st and a good prospect if not more if we were to take back a dump and duchene would bring back something good if Poile were to retain a couple million. Ekholm and duchene still have value and you’re treating them like cap dumps


They could. It's an entirely different direction.

1.) A dump makes your team worse
2) It would need to be a dump that is signed for 3 more seasons (have fun with that), as most teams cannot afford Duchene and/or Ekholm. Please tell me which teams could/would take on these contracts and give up a 1st?
3) Then you need to wait 4-5 years until those players are any good.

You have Josi and Jaros and they ain't getting any younger. If you're going that route, might as well trade those guys too. I really don't see NSH doing that.
Jan. 13, 2023 at 2:19 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 800
Quoting: GeauxPreds1
Or if Nashville is dead set on selling these 2 players they could do it separately. Ekholm will bring back a 1st and a good prospect if not more if we were to take back a dump and duchene would bring back something good if Poile were to retain a couple million. Ekholm and duchene still have value and you’re treating them like cap dumps


I'm not treating them like cap dumps, I'm giving you value back in return in giving you younger players that get help your 27th ranked PP (Mitts and Olofsson are two of the best PP players in the league) and your overall GF.

Duchene 2.68 Pts/60
Mitts 2.34
Olofsson 2.34

You'd be getting basically the same amount of production out of Mitts as you do from Duchene at a fraction of the cost.

I'd be fine keeping Mitts and Olofsson, though. So, if the trade is rejected, I'm fine either way.

What would you want only for Ekholm? 2024 1st + 2023 2nd (VGK) + Karlsson?
Jan. 13, 2023 at 2:36 p.m.
#16
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,609
Likes: 9,207
Quoting: worldwidesensei
I put in the description why. But I'll elaborate.

1. Which NHL teams can A) Afford these players? B) And if they can afford them, want them?

There won't be many suitors for these players.

2. They get a ton of cap space and a young C coming into his own and one of the top goal scorers in the league.

I don't really envision NSH as a tear-it-all-down type of team. They get players now in Mitts and Oloffson and cap space to pull off other moves.


But, I'll ask you and NSH fans. What would you expect from these players if you are trading them and what teams can pull off such a move?


1. They can take on bad cap and/or retain. Isn't Ottawa linked to Ekholm already
2. Mittlestadt won't replace Duchene and push them further back. Or they could get at least a 1st if not 2 plus a couple of 2nds and prospects for that package and do a proper rebuild
Jan. 13, 2023 at 2:47 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 800
Quoting: Shibbal18
1. They can take on bad cap and/or retain. Isn't Ottawa linked to Ekholm already
2. Mittlestadt won't replace Duchene and push them further back. Or they could get at least a 1st if not 2 plus a couple of 2nds and prospects for that package and do a proper rebuild


I highly doubt they retain for 3 more years.
They would also need to take on bad cap for more than 1 year as well with the flat cap.

OTT is a team that could take on Ekholm, but it would be tough. They have $17mm in cap space with 13 players signed. After acquiring Ekholm, that lowers them to $10.75mm, with 9 more players to sign, including DeBrincat and I don't see any dumps that they could ship out.

Doesn't make much sense for NSH. They get what? A 2023 1st? If OTT doesn't climb the standings, I doubt OTT is giving up a 2023 ~9-12OA pick. So, that means a 2024 pick. Which means, that player might be good in 2028? 2029? 2030?
Jan. 13, 2023 at 2:56 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 800
Quoting: Shibbal18
1. They can take on bad cap and/or retain. Isn't Ottawa linked to Ekholm already
2. Mittlestadt won't replace Duchene and push them further back. Or they could get at least a 1st if not 2 plus a couple of 2nds and prospects for that package and do a proper rebuild


Again, who is giving NSH these 1st round picks? Certainly not a bottom-dwelling team that is picking in the top 10-16. So that leaves the playoff teams...none of which can take on their cap hits.

I know you think Mitts is very, very bad (he isn't), I've illustrated how his production is basically the same as Duchene's. However, even if NSH takes a step back with Mitts...isn't that a good thing? They will get a higher draft pick in 2023 then and $5.5mm in cap space.

A Mitts <> Duchene trade is a loss for BUF. I really want Ekholm here, so if they just want picks and prospects for him, sure I'm all ears...just not a 2023 1st, nor one of our previous 1st round picks.
Jan. 13, 2023 at 3:00 p.m.
#19
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 30,110
Likes: 11,608
Quoting: worldwidesensei
The' t' stands for "top". I'm not cherry-picking anything. I'm talking about the present, man. There are 96 forwards on the top line. He scores more goals than half of them.


Look. You can try stretching like Elastagirl, by no metric is Olofsson one of the top goal scorers in the league. OBVIOUSLY.
Jan. 13, 2023 at 3:14 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 800
Quoting: mokumboi
Look. You can try stretching like Elastagirl, by no metric is Olofsson one of the top goal scorers in the league. OBVIOUSLY.


I'm not stretching anything. He's one of the top 48 goal scorers this year. He's consistently a top 96 goal scorer in the past 4 years.

From 2019-2021 (I can only go back 3 years with naturalstattrick): t-93 in goals with players like Kopitar, Malkin, Carter and more than Eichel, Stone, Konecny.
In 2022-23, he has 16 goals, tied with players like Marner, JT Miller, DeBrusk, Kadri and more than B. Tkachuk, Couture, Bergeron, Eichel, DeBrincat, Larkin

There's no stretching there. Just simple facts.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Jan. 13, 2023 at 3:37 p.m.
#21
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 30,110
Likes: 11,608
Quoting: worldwidesensei
I'm not stretching anything. He's one of the top 48 goal scorers this year. He's consistently a top 96 goal scorer in the past 4 years...



Dude. How is this not embarrassing? Top 48? Top 96? That is not considered a top goal scorer. OBVIOUSLY. "One of the top goal scorers in the league" is maybe top 10 or 15 or even 20. Not 48. Not 96. Not 16 goals in a season. Nobody thinks Marner and DeBrusk and these guys are top scorers in the league. Like... what are you missing here? I'm not mad, I'm genuinely baffled.
Jan. 13, 2023 at 3:47 p.m.
#22
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,609
Likes: 9,207
Quoting: worldwidesensei
Again, who is giving NSH these 1st round picks? Certainly not a bottom-dwelling team that is picking in the top 10-16. So that leaves the playoff teams...none of which can take on their cap hits.

I know you think Mitts is very, very bad (he isn't), I've illustrated how his production is basically the same as Duchene's. However, even if NSH takes a step back with Mitts...isn't that a good thing? They will get a higher draft pick in 2023 then and $5.5mm in cap space.

A Mitts <> Duchene trade is a loss for BUF. I really want Ekholm here, so if they just want picks and prospects for him, sure I'm all ears...just not a 2023 1st, nor one of our previous 1st round picks.


Quoting: worldwidesensei
I highly doubt they retain for 3 more years.
They would also need to take on bad cap for more than 1 year as well with the flat cap.

OTT is a team that could take on Ekholm, but it would be tough. They have $17mm in cap space with 13 players signed. After acquiring Ekholm, that lowers them to $10.75mm, with 9 more players to sign, including DeBrincat and I don't see any dumps that they could ship out.

Doesn't make much sense for NSH. They get what? A 2023 1st? If OTT doesn't climb the standings, I doubt OTT is giving up a 2023 ~9-12OA pick. So, that means a 2024 pick. Which means, that player might be good in 2028? 2029? 2030?


What happened to Ottawa's 2019 1st. Didn't take 5 years for him
Jan. 13, 2023 at 5:29 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 800
Quoting: Shibbal18
What happened to Ottawa's 2019 1st. Didn't take 5 years for him


Lassi Thompson? He's played 18 games and has 5 points.
Jan. 13, 2023 at 5:34 p.m.
#24
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 800
Quoting: mokumboi
Dude. How is this not embarrassing? Top 48? Top 96? That is not considered a top goal scorer. OBVIOUSLY. "One of the top goal scorers in the league" is maybe top 10 or 15 or even 20. Not 48. Not 96. Not 16 goals in a season. Nobody thinks Marner and DeBrusk and these guys are top scorers in the league. Like... what are you missing here? I'm not mad, I'm genuinely baffled.


Why would I be embarrassed. Everything I have said is factual. "Top" is subjective. For you, you think there can only be 10 or 15 or 20. I specifically put a number (48, or 96), so as not to be misleading.

Olofsson would be the leading goal scorer this year on 7 teams (DET, CHI, ARI, CBJ, NYI, CAL, ANA)
And he would be 2nd in goals on another 10 teams.

That would make him 1st or 2nd in goals on over half of the teams in the league.

The embarrassing part would be trading Olofsson for a 2nd round pick.
Jan. 13, 2023 at 6:05 p.m.
#25
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,609
Likes: 9,207
Quoting: worldwidesensei
Lassi Thompson? He's played 18 games and has 5 points.


The one that went to Colorado and became Byram
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll