SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

TDL moves

Created by: ChiHawk
Team: 2022-23 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 15, 2023
Published: Jan. 15, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Kane goes to the Rangers if anywhere. Either KK or Alexis 1 for 1 or Kravtsov + 2023 1st

Toews to Avs, Jets or Oilers. Compher to move cap, Kaut isn't worth much

Domi to Toronto to fill the top 6 LW spot
Trades
1.
NYR
  1. Kane, Patrick ($5,250,000 retained)
2.
CHI
  1. Voit, Ty
  2. 2024 2nd round pick (TOR)
TOR
  1. Domi, Max ($1,500,000 retained)
3.
4.
CHI
  1. 2023 1st round pick (COL)
COL
  1. Johnson, Jack
  2. Toews, Jonathan ($5,250,000 retained)
  3. 2023 3rd round pick (DAL)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Recapture Fees
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2024
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2025
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$82,500,000$65,390,129$237,500$1,307,500$17,109,871
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,650,000$2,650,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$750,000$750,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$758,333$758,333
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,200,000$1,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$758,333$758,333
LW
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,800,000$3,800,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,350,000$1,350,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$866,667$866,667
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$867,500$867,500 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$975,000$975,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 15, 2023 at 1:29 p.m.
#26
GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 4,006
Likes: 1,804
Quoting: ChiHawk
In the description I mention Kakko or Laffy or a 1st plus Kravstov. My gut says, based on everything I've read and all the hockey I've watched, NYR is the most likely landing spot for Kane. Doesn't mean it will happen, and doesn't mean one of the 3 options I've outlined is the outcome, but they are possibilities whether fans from either side like it or not. This isn't about what I want to see or not, it's just objective based on reporting and neither your subjective opinion nor mine play a role in it.


You mean these sources that are 95 % of the time wrong (at the best of times) generally making these rumours up just to stir up more hockey conversations to make more money, you mean those "expects" with their "sources" probably they call up NYR management saying if Kane landed in your lap with 50 % retention would you say yes or no, they say sure. And then they write articles about NYR being all in etc. If their sources are that good why are they 95 % wrong about pretty much everything...
Jan. 15, 2023 at 1:33 p.m.
#27
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,413
Likes: 9,974
Quoting: aadoyle
No they don't

Tampa it's first cup went and got guys with term. Then went and got Hagel who had term. Only rental was savard who they really didn't need but went and got.

In general writing an essay does not prove anything. Toronto does not need to go all in on rentals


This is hardly an essay guy. The point is, more cup winners...and sustainable ones at that, went and got 1 year rental guys to fill gaps or a gap.

Again, loser mentality for a team with a record breaking 6 first series post season losses in a row, 55+ years since a cup, to ignore rentals when the team is icing the best team in 55+ years and the best chance to compete. Again, it's this season and next before there's decent chance the Leafs take a step backwards, but hey, that late 2nd round pick and a 19 year old kid who's never played pro hockey are way more important than filling immediate needs to win a cup. Short-sighted behavior like this is the reason Toronto hasn't had success.
Jan. 15, 2023 at 1:35 p.m.
#28
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,413
Likes: 9,974
Edited Jan. 15, 2023 at 2:08 p.m.
Quoting: AG_sweden
You mean these sources that are 95 % of the time wrong (at the best of times) generally making these rumours up just to stir up more hockey conversations to make more money, you mean those "expects" with their "sources" probably they call up NYR management saying if Kane landed in your lap with 50 % retention would you say yes or no, they say sure. And then they write articles about NYR being all in etc. If their sources are that good why are they 95 % wrong about pretty much everything...


You are using conjecture to say "these sources" (suggesting the ones I use are the general mean, are 95% wrong. The Athletic, anyone who knows hockey, knows they are incredibly accurate as far as sources go which isn't the highest benchmark. Doesn't mean they are right more often then not or even 25% of the time, but generally speaking they aren't very far off simply because they are talking to scouts, GMs, and conveying insider opinion versus their own.
Jan. 15, 2023 at 1:43 p.m.
#29
GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 4,006
Likes: 1,804
Quoting: ChiHawk
You are using conjecture to say "these sources" (suggesting the ones I use are the general mean, are 95% wrong. The Athletic, anyone who knows hockey, knows they are incredibly accurate as far as sources go. Doesn't mean they are right more often then not or even 25% of the time, but generally speaking they aren't very far off simply because they are talking to scouts, GMs, and conveying insider opinion versus their own.


I guess we will see then grin
ChiHawk liked this.
Jan. 15, 2023 at 2:34 p.m.
#30
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 1,515
Quoting: ChiHawk
In the description I mention Kakko or Laffy or a 1st plus Kravstov. My gut says, based on everything I've read and all the hockey I've watched, NYR is the most likely landing spot for Kane. Doesn't mean it will happen, and doesn't mean one of the 3 options I've outlined is the outcome, but they are possibilities whether fans from either side like it or not. This isn't about what I want to see or not, it's just objective based on reporting and neither your subjective opinion nor mine play a role in it.


Why I said Kravstov is available. Drury isn't going to trade the other players I mentioned for any rental, including Kane.
Jan. 15, 2023 at 3:16 p.m.
#31
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,413
Likes: 9,974
Quoting: delneggs
Why I said Kravstov is available. Drury isn't going to trade the other players I mentioned for any rental, including Kane.


Nobody knows right now objectively speaking....subjective sideline opinions aside
Jan. 15, 2023 at 3:30 p.m.
#32
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 1,515
Quoting: ChiHawk
Nobody knows right now objectively speaking....subjective sideline opinions aside


Drury does not like giving up top assets for rentals, that is not a secret. And the Copp trade was not a rental because Drury wanted to sign him long term.
Jan. 15, 2023 at 4:14 p.m.
#33
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,413
Likes: 9,974
Quoting: delneggs
Drury does not like giving up top assets for rentals, that is not a secret. And the Copp trade was not a rental because Drury wanted to sign him long term.


Okay, that's fair historically, but who knows moving forward. NY is in a strange position right now. They should be competing now versus looking out 4 or 5 years IMO.
Jan. 15, 2023 at 5:05 p.m.
#34
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 1,515
Quoting: ChiHawk
Okay, that's fair historically, but who knows moving forward. NY is in a strange position right now. They should be competing now versus looking out 4 or 5 years IMO.


They are already competing. They went 6 games in the ECF last season as one of the youngest teams in the league and they are in the hunt this year even though they have been inconsistent. That comes with a young team though. Probably, their best shot at a cup is this season and the next 2 while Igor is on a cheap contract, so no reason to compromise their chances the next 2 years by giving up good young players now for just one playoff run with a rental like Kane. If they can get Kane for Kravstov and a pick, that's fine, because Kravstov isn't in the long term plan IMO and he isn't contributing much now either.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll