Forums/Armchair-GM

Next year

Initial Creation Date: Jan. 22, 2023
Published: Jan. 22, 2023
Team: 2023-24 Buffalo Sabres
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
Levi, Devon2$850,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
Cozens, Dylan8$7,500,000
Jost, Tyson2$1,750,000
Asplund, Rasmus2$985,000
Weissbach, Linus2$775,000
Rousek, Lukas2$775,000
Cecconi, Joseph2$775,000
Davies, Jeremy2$775,000
Clague, Kale1$875,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
Subban, Malcolm1$875,000
Okposo, Kyle1$2,000,000
Girgensons, Zemgus1$2,000,000
Reimer, James1$3,000,000
Trades
1.
BUF
  1. Murphy, Connor
CHI
  1. Huglen, Aaron [Reserve List]
  2. 2023 2nd round pick (PHI)
  3. 2024 5th round pick (BUF)
2.
BUF
  1. 2024 4th round pick (SJS)
ARI
  1. Bryson, Jacob
Additional Details:
Elsewhere
Buyouts
  • Christian Ehrhoff: $0
  • Eric Comrie: $600,000
DRAFT YEARROUND 1ROUND 2ROUND 3ROUND 4ROUND 5ROUND 6ROUND 7
2023
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2024
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2025
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$71,900,237$0$3,145,000$11,599,763
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
Skinner, Jeff
$9,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
Thompson, Tage
$7,142,857
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
Tuch, Alex
$4,750,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
Peterka, John-Jason
$855,833
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
Cozens, Dylan
$7,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
Quinn, Jack
$863,333
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
Mittelstadt, Casey
$2,500,000
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
Jost, Tyson
$1,750,000
C
RFA
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
Olofsson, Victor
$4,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
Girgensons, Zemgus
$2,000,000
LW, C
UFA
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
Krebs, Peyton
$863,333
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
Okposo, Kyle
$2,000,000
RW
UFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
Samuelsson, Mattias
$4,285,714
LD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
Dahlin, Rasmus
$6,000,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
Luukkonen, Ukko-Pekka
$837,500
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
Power, Owen
$916,667
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
Murphy, Connor
$4,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Reimer, James
$3,000,000
G
UFA
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
Jokiharju, Henri
$2,500,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
Lyubushkin, Ilya
$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
Clague, Kale
$875,000
LD/RD
RFA
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
Rousek, Lukas
$775,000
RW
RFA
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
Asplund, Rasmus
$985,000
LW, C
RFA

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 22 at 9:02 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 4,980
Likes: 3,204
Once again, Murphy's value is only rising, but your proposal seems to reflect the opposite. Huglen is not the least bit interesting.
Hawksguy81, BUFF36 and CB37 liked this.
Jan. 22 at 9:04 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 21,974
Likes: 10,785
Quoting: Garak
Once again, Murphy's value is only rising, but your proposal seems to reflect the opposite. Huglen is not the least bit interesting.


Once again, a top 40 pick and more for a defensive only player like Murphy is pretty darn good value
Jan. 22 at 9:10 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 4,980
Likes: 3,204
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Once again, a top 40 pick and more for a defensive only player like Murphy is pretty darn good value


"Defense only" is a little bit of a stretch, but yeah he is mostly defense first. Maybe you are right though, but I still don't think it gets done like this and I think CHI can do better with Murphy. You could also take Huglen out and this trade would have essentially the same value. Also, there is no guarantee that is a top 40 pick, PHI is pretty high in the standings for a non-playoff team.
Hawksguy81, BUFF36 and boilermaker liked this.
Jan. 22 at 9:15 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 1,727
Likes: 1,218
Here's the thing w/ all of these Murphy and McCabe to Buffalo trades. Since both are signed for multiple years at reasonable cap hits, the Hawks don't have to trade either player this season unless they get offers they can't turn down. I'm of the opinion each of them could return a 1st, or if not, a 2nd and a good prospect.

This discussion has been had on multiple previous Sabres ACGM posts. I get that Sabres fans don't want to part w/ 1st rounders or their better prospects, but if the Sabres don't, some other team will. Or if not, Hawks just keep both players.
Garak, CB37 and boilermaker liked this.
Jan. 22 at 9:15 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 2,889
Likes: 2,147
Quoting: Garak
"Defense only" is a little bit of a stretch, but yeah he is mostly defense first. Maybe you are right though, but I still don't think it gets done like this and I think CHI can do better with Murphy. You could also take Huglen out and this trade would have essentially the same value. Also, there is no guarantee that is a top 40 pick, PHI is pretty high in the standings for a non-playoff team.


How about Bloom
Hawksguy81 and Garak liked this.
Jan. 22 at 9:16 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 21,974
Likes: 10,785
Quoting: Garak
"Defense only" is a little bit of a stretch, but yeah he is mostly defense first. Maybe you are right though, but I still don't think it gets done like this and I think CHI can do better with Murphy. You could also take Huglen out and this trade would have essentially the same value. Also, there is no guarantee that is a top 40 pick, PHI is pretty high in the standings for a non-playoff team.


Right now it would be 42nd and I suspect they move some guys

And yes, being on an 11 point pace following a 14 point pace season is almost the definition of defense only
Jan. 22 at 9:17 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 21,974
Likes: 10,785
Quoting: Hawksguy81
Here's the thing w/ all of these Murphy and McCabe to Buffalo trades. Since both are signed for multiple years at reasonable cap hits, the Hawks don't have to trade either player this season unless they get offers they can't turn down. I'm of the opinion each of them could return a 1st, or if not, a 2nd and a good prospect.

This discussion has been had on multiple previous Sabres ACGM posts. I get that Sabres fans don't want to part w/ 1st rounders or their better prospects, but if the Sabres don't, some other team will. Or if not, Hawks just keep both players.


Then keep them.
Jan. 22 at 9:25 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 4,980
Likes: 3,204
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Right now it would be 42nd and I suspect they move some guys

And yes, being on an 11 point pace following a 14 point pace season is almost the definition of defense only


Sure. Points aren't everything, though. He contributes to offense a lot in ways that aren't reflected on a basic stats sheet, i.e. shutting down play and starting transitions back to offense, moving the puck up the ice, keeping pucks in the offensive zone and moving them into open space for offense to build off of, activating to draw players out of position, etc. There is a reason why he is so attractive to other teams, and his defense first style is a huge part of that. It is something a lot of teams are missing. Most "good" dmen would have absolutely awful goal differentials if they weren't always trying to score. I am of the opinion that dmen should play defense, and a "lack" of offense doesn't make them any less valuable.

Also, you can literally only have a 23 man roster. Having all of these players and prospects in your system does nothing if you can't put them on NHL ice.
Jan. 22 at 11:23 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 774
Likes: 176
Quoting: Garak
Sure. Points aren't everything, though. He contributes to offense a lot in ways that aren't reflected on a basic stats sheet, i.e. shutting down play and starting transitions back to offense, moving the puck up the ice, keeping pucks in the offensive zone and moving them into open space for offense to build off of, activating to draw players out of position, etc. There is a reason why he is so attractive to other teams, and his defense first style is a huge part of that. It is something a lot of teams are missing. Most "good" dmen would have absolutely awful goal differentials if they weren't always trying to score. I am of the opinion that dmen should play defense, and a "lack" of offense doesn't make them any less valuable.

Also, you can literally only have a 23 man roster. Having all of these players and prospects in your system does nothing if you can't put them on NHL ice.


Quoting: Garak
Sure. Points aren't everything, though. He contributes to offense a lot in ways that aren't reflected on a basic stats sheet, i.e. shutting down play and starting transitions back to offense, moving the puck up the ice, keeping pucks in the offensive zone and moving them into open space for offense to build off of, activating to draw players out of position, etc. There is a reason why he is so attractive to other teams, and his defense first style is a huge part of that. It is something a lot of teams are missing. Most "good" dmen would have absolutely awful goal differentials if they weren't always trying to score. I am of the opinion that dmen should play defense, and a "lack" of offense doesn't make them any less valuable.

Also, you can literally only have a 23 man roster. Having all of these players and prospects in your system does nothing if you can't put them on NHL ice.


Blocked shots.
Garak liked this.
Jan. 22 at 11:23 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 774
Likes: 176
Quoting: Garak
Sure. Points aren't everything, though. He contributes to offense a lot in ways that aren't reflected on a basic stats sheet, i.e. shutting down play and starting transitions back to offense, moving the puck up the ice, keeping pucks in the offensive zone and moving them into open space for offense to build off of, activating to draw players out of position, etc. There is a reason why he is so attractive to other teams, and his defense first style is a huge part of that. It is something a lot of teams are missing. Most "good" dmen would have absolutely awful goal differentials if they weren't always trying to score. I am of the opinion that dmen should play defense, and a "lack" of offense doesn't make them any less valuable.

Also, you can literally only have a 23 man roster. Having all of these players and prospects in your system does nothing if you can't put them on NHL ice.


Quoting: Garak
Sure. Points aren't everything, though. He contributes to offense a lot in ways that aren't reflected on a basic stats sheet, i.e. shutting down play and starting transitions back to offense, moving the puck up the ice, keeping pucks in the offensive zone and moving them into open space for offense to build off of, activating to draw players out of position, etc. There is a reason why he is so attractive to other teams, and his defense first style is a huge part of that. It is something a lot of teams are missing. Most "good" dmen would have absolutely awful goal differentials if they weren't always trying to score. I am of the opinion that dmen should play defense, and a "lack" of offense doesn't make them any less valuable.

Also, you can literally only have a 23 man roster. Having all of these players and prospects in your system does nothing if you can't put them on NHL ice.


Blocked shots.
Jan. 22 at 7:02 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 637
Quoting: Garak
Once again, Murphy's value is only rising, but your proposal seems to reflect the opposite. Huglen is not the least bit interesting.


How much was DeBrincat worth on this forum last year ?
Jan. 22 at 7:08 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 4,980
Likes: 3,204
Quoting: Czu8iks
How much was DeBrincat worth on this forum last year ?


A prospect and two 1sts was the general going rate. But, CHI did get a 7th overall pick, which is worth a hell of a lot more than the late 1sts most people were offering for Cat last year. That is something a lot of people seem to overlook. Not all 1sts are created equal.
Jan. 22 at 7:14 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 637
Quoting: Garak
A prospect and two 1sts was the general going rate. But, CHI did get a 7th overall pick, which is worth a hell of a lot more than the late 1sts most people were offering for Cat last year. That is something a lot of people seem to overlook. Not all 1sts are created equal.


But that was at the draft, weak draft. This one is stacked, with generation talent goint 1st - no one is giving away something more than lottery protected 1st at TDL.
Garak liked this.
Jan. 22 at 10:19 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 4,980
Likes: 3,204
Quoting: Czu8iks
But that was at the draft, weak draft. This one is stacked, with generation talent goint 1st - no one is giving away something more than lottery protected 1st at TDL.


I mean... it was weak at the top of the draft, but it was pretty normal beyond the top 3 ranked picks. And a lot of that ambiguity has to do with all the lost developmental years during the pandemic. So, scouts didn't quite know what to think of them or how to project them. But I'm sure a lot of them will end up being really good. Including the ones that CHI drafted. Korchinski is looking like a possible superstar and an all but certain number one dman. Nazar was touted as having the highest upside of anyone in the draft, was unanimously ranked in the top 10 but somehow fell to CHI at 13th overall. Rinzel was always going to be a project, but with his skillset/toolkit, he has a ton of potential.

Most of the people on here that were making offers for Cat were fans of contending teams. Which would've meant their picks would be late 1sts, which is why it would've taken more than one. But a 7th overall pick even in last years draft is a big difference from a late 1st. Do I think he could've pressed for more or waited and got more? Yeah, probably. Am I upset with what we got? Not in the least. There will be plenty of DeBrincat caliber players available between now and when CHI is coming out of this rebuild, and there is a good chance some of them will come right through our own pipeline.
Jan. 23 at 11:18 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 637
Quoting: Garak
There will be plenty of DeBrincat caliber players available between now and when CHI is coming out of this rebuild, and there is a good chance some of them will come right through our own pipeline.


Isn't DeBrincat dissapointment ? Would Ottawa do same trade today ? He is still top line guy, but production is worse than in Chicago. And there was rumour that Ottawa and Sabres had to for Sabres taking Murray along with 1st round pick, before Chicago took that for DeBrincat. So Ottawa wasn't valuing this pick highly.

And I think last year draft was easy on top with like top 6 was one group to choose from. Then you had other group between 7 and 21.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll