SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Playoff Push - Give Up Something to Get Something

Created by: DownwiththeDevil
Team: 2022-23 New Jersey Devils
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 27, 2023
Published: Jan. 27, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Playoff Push to get out scorer with the expectation TM signs a contract extension for something like 8x8 or 7.95m per to be paid less than JH to consumate the trade and leave some room to extend Bratt.
DK is a big rugged dman we know and provides depth we need down the stretch.

Cut the cord on MB, I think it's time with Schmid and Daws development, but for the push you take Reimer back. Maybe a change of scenary is what MB needs and SJS may be open to a project for a inconsistent Goalie who at the beginning of last year was in the conversation for a spot on Canada's Olympic Team.
Trades
1.
NJD
  1. Meier, Timo ($2,000,000 retained)
  2. Reimer, James
SJS
  1. Blackwood, Mackenzie
  2. Holtz, Alexander
  3. Walsh, Reilly
  4. 2023 1st round pick (NJD)
  5. 2024 2nd round pick (NJD)
Additional Details:
Time to cut bait on MB unfortunately in my opinon with Scmid and Daws developing well. I think Shmid could be the backup next season. Reimer would be a good rental and backup for the playoffs.

With the 2 draft picks and Holtz, Walsh may be too much but maybe its what is required to push the deal through since SJS need actual prospects. I would avoid sending YS of your giving up Holtz. Shakir would be like sending another 1st round pick so that doesn't make sense either.

2023 1st rd pick is top 10 protected (unlikely matters)
2024 2nd rd pick becomes a 1st if the NJDs make it to the SCF
2.
ANA
  1. Johnsson, Andreas
  2. McCarthy, Case [Reserve List]
  3. 2023 4th round pick (NJD)
Additional Details:
Got to give something to get rid of AJ and make the dollars fit for Kulikov. I rather have Kulikov back there on the 3rd pair, but him and Smith can basically platoon based on whoever is playing better.
Buyouts
Recapture Fees
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
2024
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
2025
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$76,276,625$0$400,000$6,223,375
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$5,450,000$5,450,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
UFA - 8
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$2,375,000$2,375,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$874,125$874,125
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$750,000$750,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$3,200,000$3,200,000
LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$3,166,667$3,166,667
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,125,000$1,125,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,125,000$1,125,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$4,166,666$4,166,666
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LD/RD, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$4,125,000$4,125,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$975,000$975,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$825,000$825,000
RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 27, 2023 at 6:44 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,268
Likes: 11,645
We can get a 3rd from the Rangers in the most agreed trade on CF

Why would we want a lesser puck along with a cap dump?
OldNYIfan liked this.
Jan. 27, 2023 at 7:03 p.m.
#2
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,112
Likes: 25,024
We expect to get a 2023 third-round pick for Kulikov, either from the Rangers, or the Maple Leafs, or someone else. You don't even have one, so we're going to take some persuading to accept your 2024 third. Combine that with wanting to dispose of Andreas Johnsson, and the prospect we should be getting is Seamus Casey, not Case McCarthy.
Jan. 27, 2023 at 7:07 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 1,079
Mack has been much better than Reimer this year
Jan. 27, 2023 at 7:11 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 1,079
Quoting: OldNYIfan
We expect to get a 2023 third-round pick for Kulikov, either from the Rangers, or the Maple Leafs, or someone else. You don't even have one, so we're going to take some persuading to accept your 2024 third. Combine that with wanting to dispose of Andreas Johnsson, and the prospect we should be getting is Seamus Casey, not Case McCarthy.


Quoting: GeneralLandro
We can get a 3rd from the Rangers in the most agreed trade on CF

Why would we want a lesser puck along with a cap dump?


Kulikov was moved for a 4th a few years ago. Seems like he’s bound to be his own comp here, in what’s been a down year by his standards. I agree the dump would make it more costly, but I can’t see Kulikov netting a 3rd when he didn’t get that return while younger and providing more, and definitely wouldn’t cost a. top D prospect to dump
Tintin liked this.
Jan. 27, 2023 at 7:23 p.m.
#5
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,647
Likes: 6,395
Quoting: Tbrew
Kulikov was moved for a 4th a few years ago. Seems like he’s bound to be his own comp here, in what’s been a down year by his standards. I agree the dump would make it more costly, but I can’t see Kulikov netting a 3rd when he didn’t get that return while younger and providing more, and definitely wouldn’t cost a. top D prospect to dump


It'll take more than a guy you might not even give an ELC to and can walk since he went 4 year NCAA route.

We'll meet in the middle at Walsh.
Jan. 27, 2023 at 8:02 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 1,079
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
It'll take more than a guy you might not even give an ELC to and can walk since he went 4 year NCAA route.

We'll meet in the middle at Walsh.


There’s nothing that has suggested Casey would do the 4 years of college to go UFA.

Walsh makes sense though. He’s not getting younger, and doesn’t belong buried in the AHL. He should be on an NHL roster
Jan. 27, 2023 at 8:08 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 723
Quoting: Tbrew
Kulikov was moved for a 4th a few years ago.


By the same token the Ducks really aren't needing to move him for a 4th and a cap dump forward. Someone has to play defense between the TDL and the end of the season and it can easily be Kulikov. I liken it a lot to the Deslauriers trade to MIN. He would have continued to be a useful player for Anaheim with a trade value of a 4th. But the Wild wanted him bad enough to cough up a 3rd to which the Ducks weren't going to say no.

So you either want Kulikov bad enough to pay a 3rd or you don't. Makes no difference to me either way.

And FWIW, that D prospect in this trade is basically garbage.
Jan. 27, 2023 at 8:21 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 1,079
Quoting: CHAR
By the same token the Ducks really aren't needing to move him for a 4th and a cap dump forward. Someone has to play defense between the TDL and the end of the season and it can easily be Kulikov. I liken it a lot to the Deslauriers trade to MIN. He would have continued to be a useful player for Anaheim with a trade value of a 4th. But the Wild wanted him bad enough to cough up a 3rd to which the Ducks weren't going to say no.

So you either want Kulikov bad enough to pay a 3rd or you don't. Makes no difference to me either way.

And FWIW, that D prospect in this trade is basically garbage.


He didn’t need to be moved before either, and I mentioned that the cap dump deserves some sort of value moving the other way (though I really don’t understand the cap dump from OP in the first place when the price for Meier is more than enough to get 50% retention)
Maybe a team does want him bad enough, but he is playing worse than he did when he was worth a late 4th a couple of year back. Hard to justify paying much more than that price for a worse version of the guy
Jan. 28, 2023 at 12:16 a.m.
#9
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,647
Likes: 6,395
Quoting: Tbrew
There’s nothing that has suggested Casey would do the 4 years of college to go UFA.

Walsh makes sense though. He’s not getting younger, and doesn’t belong buried in the AHL. He should be on an NHL roster


McCarthy did his 4th year of NCAA and probably walks, not Casey.

I think though we can agree on Walsh, gives the guy an opportunity on an NHL roster where the Ducks have an opening paired with Vaakainen.
Jan. 28, 2023 at 9:37 a.m.
#10
do not Devil my ass
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,872
Likes: 4,248
I'd love to get Meier in but that's about one 1st rd pick too much for him.
Your suggested return is twice that of rental wingers, it probably even exceeds the value Eichel returned to the Sabres when he got traded.

Also, I cannot see Kulikov being either worthy of such a return nor an upgrade on any of Brendan Smith, Okhotiuk, Bahl or even Walsh.
Rather just keep the assets in that case.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll