SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Puck stopper

Created by: Flamesfan60
Team: 2022-23 Los Angeles Kings
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 30, 2023
Published: Jan. 30, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Not a kings fan but y’all should do this.
Trades
LAK
  1. Talbot, Cam ($1,000,000 retained)
OTT
  1. Quick, Jonathan
  2. 2023 1st round pick (LAK)
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (LAK)
Buyouts
Termination Fees
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
2024
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
2025
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$80,360,001$637,500$5,795,000$2,139,999
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$7,875,000$7,875,000
RW, LW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$795,000$795,000 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$5,500,000$5,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$4,250,000$4,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$1,675,000$1,675,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$825,000$825,000
RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$1,350,000$1,350,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,650,000$3M)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$350,000$350K)
C, LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$1,550,000$2M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$750,000$750,000
C, LW, RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$1,700,000$1,700,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$11,000,000$11,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$2,666,667$2,666,667
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$3,150,000$3,150,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$825,000$825,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$262,500$262K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$2,650,000$2,650,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$750,000$750,000 (Performance Bonus$750,000$750K)
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$1,875,000$1,875,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$1,300,000$1,300,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$150,000$150K)
RW, LW
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 30, 2023 at 5:10 p.m.
#1
Thegreatdebater
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 1,560
Likes: 212
Maybe if you took out the 1st and got rid of the retention on Talbot the Kings would do it.
Jan. 30, 2023 at 5:12 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 7,136
Likes: 3,490
I do that trade in an instant.
OldNYIfan and Hckeydude123 liked this.
Jan. 30, 2023 at 5:24 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 3,659
Likes: 1,626
Quoting: sens65
I do that trade in an instant.

Of course you would. It’s terrible for LA
OldNYIfan, sens65 and Hckeydude123 liked this.
Jan. 30, 2023 at 5:24 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 3,659
Likes: 1,626
23’ 1st is not going to go for Talbot.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Jan. 30, 2023 at 5:27 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 2,222
Lol there is no way the Kings would do that.
OldNYIfan and Hckeydude123 liked this.
Jan. 30, 2023 at 5:31 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 7,136
Likes: 3,490
Quoting: KINGS67
Of course you would. It’s terrible for LA


Yeah, in no universe does that trade make any sense lol. Talbot is barely an upgrade at all over Quick.
OldNYIfan and KINGS67 liked this.
Jan. 30, 2023 at 5:33 p.m.
#7
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,273
Likes: 25,181
No, we're not trading ANY first (including the 2025 one) for a rental goalie, never mind the facts that he's currently injured or that he's expensive. But Ottawa needs an experienced RhD, so I can see trading Sean Walker for him one-for-one.
Jan. 30, 2023 at 5:43 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2022
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 511
Quick will retire after this season as a King. Kings aren't going to trade him and they won't put him on waivers. All they can do is roll with him and Copley or aquire an affordable goalie and scratch Quick.

This is a terrible deal for LA. That's like trading Zeitsev to a team for a decent RD while giving up a 1st and a 2nd. Would you do that?
Jan. 30, 2023 at 6:05 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,543
Likes: 6,138
This is like saying you're going to send Chabot to the Kings in exchange for future considerations. Of course LA would go for it, but there's not much incentive for Ottawa to do it.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll