SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Contender

Created by: siamro
Team: 2022-23 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 5, 2023
Published: Feb. 5, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$950,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. 2024 3rd round pick (MIN)
Additional Details:
Or any other team just using the Wild here
2.
TOR
  1. Crouse, Lawson ($2,150,000 retained)
  2. Schmaltz, Nick ($2,900,000 retained)
ARI
  1. Knies, Matthew
  2. 2023 1st round pick (TOR)
3.
TOR
  1. Henrique, Adam ($2,900,000 retained)
ANA
  1. Niemelä, Topi
  2. 2023 3rd round pick (OTT)
  3. 2024 3rd round pick (MIN)
4.
5.
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2024
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
2025
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$78,052,496$212,500$0$4,447,504
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
-$1,443,750-$1,443,750
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$2,150,000$2,150,000
LW, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$950,000$950,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$2,950,000$2,950,000
RW, C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$600,000$600,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$840,630$840,630
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$7,500,000$7,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,800,000$1,800,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,400,000$1,400,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,687,500$4,687,500
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$850,000$850,000
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 5, 2023 at 1:32 p.m.
#1
Kenneth Dolla Holla
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 190
Likes: 47
Gosh darn
Feb. 5, 2023 at 1:39 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 31
Likes: 7
Lots going on here, but Arizona wouldn’t take up two of their retention slots for that long of term. If they did it’d probably cost quite a bit more than that.
Feb. 5, 2023 at 1:42 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 20
Likes: 5
No team is going to make this many moves at the deadline.
Feb. 5, 2023 at 1:46 p.m.
#4
Future Norris guy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 15,502
Likes: 8,575
laugh For a team that has less than $3,000,000 in cap space, No team is going to make that many moves when a vast majority of buyers are up against the cap.
Feb. 5, 2023 at 1:59 p.m.
#5
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,200
Likes: 25,116
If all we are offered for Adam Henrique with 50% retention is Niemela and two thirds, we'll just have to hang onto him for another season. After all, he leads our team in goal scoring and is our best and most reliable faceoff man, in addition to being a key penalty killer, and has another year left on his contract.

Nice of all six teams dealing with you to retain, by the way.

I really don't see the strategic sense of trading several years of Rasmus Sandin for 30 games (plus one playoff season) of Vladi Gavrikov. On October 1, you might have neither (and Justin Holl, too).
Feb. 5, 2023 at 2:36 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,320
Likes: 11,703
I don’t think we part ways with Rico unless there’s a 1st attached
GiggywithGibby and OldNYIfan liked this.
Feb. 5, 2023 at 2:44 p.m.
#7
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,741
Likes: 6,498
If you want that offer to get you a retained Henrique, come back next season when he is a rental.
Feb. 5, 2023 at 3:15 p.m.
#8
mostly harmless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 6,632
Likes: 3,112
1st or no Gavrikov. We're not doing a Sandin exchange because Sandin doesn't have the skillset or experience we need, and adding wingers makes your package less attractive to Columbus.
benjgc liked this.
Feb. 5, 2023 at 3:52 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 31
Likes: 7
Quoting: Viqsi
1st or no Gavrikov. We're not doing a Sandin exchange because Sandin doesn't have the skillset or experience we need, and adding wingers makes your package less attractive to Columbus.


Pretty sure the Jackets would do Gavrikov for Sandin 1-1 and wouldn’t hesitate. Sandin would be Columbus’s what, 2nd best dman after this deal? At 22 years old.. seems like a no brainer to me. Why would you prefer a late 1st round pick that needs 2-3 years to develop over a young player you already know can play well in the NHL. Who also happened to be a late first round pick..
siamro liked this.
Feb. 5, 2023 at 6:41 p.m.
#10
mostly harmless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 6,632
Likes: 3,112
Quoting: Stewie21
Pretty sure the Jackets would do Gavrikov for Sandin 1-1 and wouldn’t hesitate. Sandin would be Columbus’s what, 2nd best dman after this deal? At 22 years old.. seems like a no brainer to me. Why would you prefer a late 1st round pick that needs 2-3 years to develop over a young player you already know can play well in the NHL. Who also happened to be a late first round pick..

I repeat: Sandin doesn't have the skillset or the experience we need, and so is not suitable as a return.
benjgc liked this.
Feb. 5, 2023 at 6:54 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
True Blue
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 209
Likes: 64
Quoting: Viqsi
I repeat: Sandin doesn't have the skillset or the experience we need, and so is not suitable as a return.


If Gavrikov isn't traded he could likely walk away as a UFA unless he wants to be a part of rebuild at this point in his career which I think would be unlikely.
With Sandin you have a RFA still controlled that can grow with the rebuild and be a top 4 D-man. He's already a better passer than Gav although Gav is better defensively which is the Leafs need right now.
Seems like a fair hockey deal
Feb. 5, 2023 at 7:03 p.m.
#12
mostly harmless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 6,632
Likes: 3,112
Quoting: siamro
If Gavrikov isn't traded

You can stop right there. You're attempting to argue as though this is the only offer we'll get and therefore we have to take it. That's nonsense and everyone knows it. The Leafs are not the only team interested in him.
squashmaple and benjgc liked this.
Feb. 6, 2023 at 11:49 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 31
Likes: 7
Quoting: Viqsi
You can stop right there. You're attempting to argue as though this is the only offer we'll get and therefore we have to take it. That's nonsense and everyone knows it. The Leafs are not the only team interested in him.


Oh there will be other offers and he will be moved forsure. Highly doubt Sandin will be offered for him as he holds more value than a rental on D imo. But if you insist that he wouldn’t fit the Blue Jackets team that’s fine. I’m just curious what “skillset” or “experience” it is that he doesn’t fit? A young puck moving dman that actually throws the body a bit, seems like that type of player would fit most rebuilding teams no?
Feb. 6, 2023 at 12:44 p.m.
#14
not a he )
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 3,147
Likes: 4,224
Edited Feb. 6, 2023 at 2:42 p.m.
Quoting: Stewie21
Oh there will be other offers and he will be moved forsure. Highly doubt Sandin will be offered for him as he holds more value than a rental on D imo. But if you insist that he wouldn’t fit the Blue Jackets team that’s fine. I’m just curious what “skillset” or “experience” it is that he doesn’t fit? A young puck moving dman that actually throws the body a bit, seems like that type of player would fit most rebuilding teams no?


The Jackets are in a weird place right now when it comes to defense. Almost the entire top of the prospect pool is defensemen, many of whom are high-end prospects (Jiricek and Ceuelemans at RD, Mateychuk and Svozil at LD), but the actual NHL team D is total garbo. What the team needs is either a Gavrikov, already an established defenseman in his later 20s who is not a work in progress, or a pure prospect or a pick. Sandin falls somewhere in between that. Speaking as a Jackets fan, he's a player I'd love to get for the team, but not in a Gavrikov trade, if that makes sense? Trading Gavrikov is an opportunity to bring in a late first round pick or a higher end prospect who'd be in the same age bracket as the Ceulemans, Mateychuks, etc. Sandin is good, but he isn't that, and using Gavrikov to acquire Sandin feels like a high opportunity cost vs what they could get. I can't speak for what Viqsi means on skillset about Sandin, though.
Viqsi and benjgc liked this.
Feb. 6, 2023 at 12:55 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 5,346
Likes: 3,385
Don't know if it's already been said, but there's no way in hell Arizona is retaining on either of those contracts for that return. That's 5M for three years and 2M for the fourth year. Value of the return doesn't even cover the players you're getting.
Feb. 6, 2023 at 12:55 p.m.
#16
mostly harmless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 6,632
Likes: 3,112
Quoting: squashmaple
The Jackets are in a weird place right now when it comes to defense. Almost the entire top of the prospect pool is defensemen, many of whom are high-end prospects (Jiricek and Ceuelemans at RD, Celemans and Svozil at LD), but the actual NHL team D is total garbo. What the team needs is either a Gavrikov, already an established defenseman in his later 20s who is not a work in progress, or a pure prospect or a pick. Sandin falls somewhere in between that. Speaking as a Jackets fan, he's a player I'd love to get for the team, but not in a Gavrikov trade, if that makes sense? Trading Gavrikov is an opportunity to bring in a late first round pick or a higher end prospect who'd be in the same age bracket as the Ceulemans, Mateychuks, etc. Sandin is good, but he isn't that, and using Gavrikov to acquire Sandin feels like a high opportunity cost vs what they could get. I can't speak for what Viqsi means on skillset about Sandin, though.

In terms of skillset, I think we badly need more pure shutdown types and that's not really Sandin's thing. He's competent but not exceptional at that part of the job.
benjgc and squashmaple liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll