SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Signings

New York Islanders signed Bo Horvat (8 Years / $8,500,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Feb. 6, 2023 at 7:24 a.m.
#76
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: chbroi
Zibanejad signed a similar contract one year ago, I would take him before Horvat anyday of the week with that contract. Not a bad contract, but not a steal either. 7-8M$ would have been better considering the contract finishes when he is 35 years old.


Zibanejad is a much more complete player than Bo
chbroi liked this.
Feb. 6, 2023 at 7:25 a.m.
#77
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: habitantlecolon
he's going to be 1st line center with Barzal on right wing


Doesn't mean that he's 1st line caliber
Feb. 6, 2023 at 7:25 a.m.
#78
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: TheAlien
oh 100% it's an awful contract. People sh*t on the Miller deal but I'd much rather have him at 8x7 over Bo's deal


Miller is still scoring at a 70+ point pace, I'd say that's pretty good for what everybody is chalking up as a down season
CSStrowbridge liked this.
Feb. 6, 2023 at 7:27 a.m.
#79
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: ChrisNapoleon
So here is my thing.
For years now, us Islander fans have been complaining that Barzal needs a linemate who matches his style level and playing style, but more importantly someone who scores goals. Eberle was a temporary solution, as he was older, and a bit closer. And the second that Lou goes out and gets a player, after all these years of complaining, everyone is now complaining about the trade. I find it so hypocritical that our fanbase does this. Everyone has to find the negative in everything. I think that it was a good trade, so long as Lou extending Horvat, which he planned on doing. Sure, I would have rather not given up Raty, but it is what it is. Everyone complained we gave too much for Horvat and that we were not going to extend him. Lou extends him, and everyone complains. It's probably the most hypocritical thing ever. I agree that Lou has made some really stupid moves, but come on man. He goes out and gets the player who is 8th in goals, and y'all just complain. I don't get it. Make up your mind.
This was a good signing, and a good trade too. We'll see what happens. Hopefully, we either make the playoffs or fall apart and get the pick for this year. I would also like if Lou traded Pageau and Bailey, but that's just me.


Doesn't change the fact that this contract likely isn't going to age well one way or another
Feb. 6, 2023 at 7:27 a.m.
#80
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: CoraStorm
I realize that NYI overpaid.... but after trading away futures - what else could they do? too much for too little, especially when Vancouver's back front was against the wall.


Vancouver's back wasn't against the wall, what nonsense are you going on about?
Feb. 6, 2023 at 7:29 a.m.
#81
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Wouldn't want the Canucks to sign Horvat to those terms even if they had the cap space
CSStrowbridge liked this.
Feb. 6, 2023 at 7:44 a.m.
#82
Leafs going to Leafs
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 9,596
Likes: 2,905
Quoting: zackhendo
Stick to the Leafs... I love Horvat but there is no way he's worth $10 mil. I'd take Miller over Horvat on my team personally.


First, he signed for 8.5 mill. Second, he doesn't have all of the hockey media critiquing his defensive play. Last, he hasn't had 2 players make fun of him one game either

I get you're mad that you traded Horvat and kept Miller but that doesn't mean than Miller is better than Horvat (it's the opposite)
Feb. 6, 2023 at 8:31 a.m.
#83
sensonfire
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 11,768
Likes: 4,438
Quoting: Knuckl3s
You don't seriously think this is a good signing


I voted no.

This signing is a gross overpayment and the Islanders couldn't find better ways to spend 8.5 million in cap space.




The only way someone could justify this as a good signing would be to argue that it prevented Horvat from walking out as a UFA.

In that case, the Islanders would have spent Beauvillier + Raty + 1st round pick on one playoff run with Horvat that might never happen.




My earlier point is that even if the Horvat signing was a good one, it doesn't justify or excuse making a bad trade to bring him in.

I apologize for the lack of clarity.
Feb. 6, 2023 at 8:44 a.m.
#84
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 349
Likes: 246
This deal is likely going to be rough. I know people think this somehow alters the value of the trade, but honestly I think it makes it worse, as this contract has a strong chance to age like Milk.

Horvat is a very good player, but he's having a career year at 27, and the 8.5M AAV won't be bad for a few years necessarily, but he's probably not outplaying it by much, and those later years didn't bring the AAV down nearly enough. What's worse is that this seems to be a big bet that he and Barzal will have instant chemistry and completely change the Islanders ability to create offense at 5 on 5 and on the powerplay. Horvat isn't a driver of offense, and he's going from a team that had more offensive talent surrounding him that he is going to have now, playing an offense-first style, and who was still pretty mediocre offensively, to a team where he's now going to have to be the complete focus of the attack in a tougher conference. What makes this trade bad is that Horvat could play at the higher end of his reasonable expectations, and this trade is still awful. He basically needs to be a 50+ goal center for the foreseeable future for this to be remotely acceptable. Lou seemingly paid a lot of assets to get a jump on the market, and this is the deal he gets from that?
Feb. 6, 2023 at 9:07 a.m.
#85
torontos finest
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 9,560
Likes: 11,191
Quoting: Knuckl3s
It doesn't make the trade on the Islanders end much better if any better at all


Feb. 6, 2023 at 10:37 a.m.
#86
feelsbadman
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 131
Likes: 88
Quoting: AK50
If he's not happy with the signing, WHY SIGN HIM???
Trade his early signing rights to get a conditional 1st+ IMO.
This deal could need more than Raty and a 1st to dump in a few years, but let's see. Who knows? Horvat could just keep being a top six center for the rest of his career scoring at least 30G a season.


ownership probably made him make the move
AK50 liked this.
Feb. 6, 2023 at 4:19 p.m.
#87
MOVE THE COYOTES
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 4,440
Likes: 1,549
I knew whoever signed horvat will regret it later. Im gonna vote no.
Saskleaf and CSStrowbridge liked this.
Feb. 6, 2023 at 10:31 p.m.
#88
VanFan12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 321
Likes: 98
Quoting: Leafsfan98
First, he signed for 8.5 mill. Second, he doesn't have all of the hockey media critiquing his defensive play. Last, he hasn't had 2 players make fun of him one game either

I get you're mad that you traded Horvat and kept Miller but that doesn't mean than Miller is better than Horvat (it's the opposite)


First, you said he could potentially get $10 mil. Second, his defensive metrics are roughly the same as Miller. Last, I honestly don't know what you're referring to, so ok.

You were the one who brought up Miller. I'm happy we traded Horvat and wish we would have traded Miller as well. I've watched both of them play for 3 years in the same system and still think Miller is a better player. Horvat is an elite finisher and has a sick toe drag move but Miller is way more dynamic of a player, IMO.
Feb. 6, 2023 at 11:01 p.m.
#89
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 387
Quoting: Hollands_missing_brain
I hope I am either misunderstanding this or you are being sarcastic...


Stamkos, Draisaitl, and Zibanejad have been PPG, Forsberg Near that, and Sergachev is having one of his best season in the NHL after signing
Feb. 7, 2023 at 7:54 a.m.
#90
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 123
Likes: 121
Quoting: VastBluepuppy424
Stamkos, Draisaitl, and Zibanejad have been PPG, Forsberg Near that, and Sergachev is having one of his best season in the NHL after signing


Forsberg and Zibanejad haven't even made it to year 2 of their contracts yet, and Sergachev is still playing on his old contract, hard to say they have already "lived up" to the contract. And the fact of the matter is to suggest every single player has lived up to their 8x8.5+ is silly.
Feb. 7, 2023 at 1:06 p.m.
#91
Leafs going to Leafs
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 9,596
Likes: 2,905
Quoting: zackhendo
First, you said he could potentially get $10 mil. Second, his defensive metrics are roughly the same as Miller. Last, I honestly don't know what you're referring to, so ok.

You were the one who brought up Miller. I'm happy we traded Horvat and wish we would have traded Miller as well. I've watched both of them play for 3 years in the same system and still think Miller is a better player. Horvat is an elite finisher and has a sick toe drag move but Miller is way more dynamic of a player, IMO.


Yes, I said he could have gotten 10 mill but he didn't and I brought up Miller because the choice Vancouver had was Horvat or Miller. Last, Peterson and Kuzmenko made fun of him during the Columbus Blue Jackets and Vancouver game (before all-star break). Saying Miller is more dynamic is a choice of words of course
Feb. 7, 2023 at 1:33 p.m.
#92
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2022
Posts: 16
Likes: 34
After Pasta, he'd have been the best UFA on the market this summer, he'd easily have been able to get this AAV from someone, probably a touch more. Isles couldn't get Gadreau or Kadri to take their money, so if they had to overpay a bit to get this deal done so be it. Only so many top 6 forwards come to market before they're past their prime and the Isles now have one of them.
Feb. 7, 2023 at 1:42 p.m.
#93
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2022
Posts: 16
Likes: 34
Quoting: NHLfan10506
That was quick. Bo must have liked the feel of that Isles jersey over All-Star weekend.


The Fisherman strikes again!
Feb. 7, 2023 at 6:01 p.m.
#94
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 546
I don’t understand why teams rush out to sign a player they’ve just acquired before he’s even played a game for them. There are three main reasons to give up assets to acquire a pending UFA near the end of his contract:

1) Immediate value as a rental.
2) First crack at signing him to his next contract, if you want to.
3) You can see how well he fits in with your team before you decide whether to commit to him long term.

The first one is easy – it’s an attempt to fill a short-term need without the risk of a long-term commitment. Getting first crack at re-signing him has value too, but in my opinion, the test drive is actually more valuable. The player is already on the path to becoming a UFA – that’s usually why he was available. To get him off that path, you’re going to have to give him a contract that’s at least as good as he thinks he can get as a UFA, so you haven’t really saved anything – it’s still costing you his UFA market value or more to sign him. I think the test drive is more valuable because the cost of being stuck with a bad contract is huge. Signing anybody long term always carries some risk, but in my opinion, that risk is greatly reduced if you’re signing a player who’s already playing for you. If you sign a guy who’s never played for you, then that’s pretty much the same as signing a UFA. So then what have you gained by trading for him? You’ve neither saved money on signing him nor reduced the risk of him not working out and leaving you stuck with a bad contract.
KingLundqvist30 liked this.
Feb. 23, 2023 at 7:23 a.m.
#95
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: sensonfire
I voted no.

This signing is a gross overpayment and the Islanders couldn't find better ways to spend 8.5 million in cap space.




The only way someone could justify this as a good signing would be to argue that it prevented Horvat from walking out as a UFA.

In that case, the Islanders would have spent Beauvillier + Raty + 1st round pick on one playoff run with Horvat that might never happen.




My earlier point is that even if the Horvat signing was a good one, it doesn't justify or excuse making a bad trade to bring him in.

I apologize for the lack of clarity.


Theoretically, that does make sense, but I just don't see how that contract ages well. It's really looking like Lou's old school sensibilities are starting to betray him
sensonfire liked this.
Mar. 10, 2023 at 9:00 a.m.
#96
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 854
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Miller is still scoring at a 70+ point pace, I'd say that's pretty good for what everybody is chalking up as a down season


Miller is scoring at a better pace than Horvat has since the trade. Hell, Beauvillier scoring at a better pace than Horvat since the trade.
Mar. 16, 2023 at 12:40 a.m.
#97
GO KNIGHTS GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 2,624
Likes: 2,266
This trade/signing is looking worse by the game
CSStrowbridge liked this.
Mar. 24, 2023 at 2:21 p.m.
#98
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 854
Quoting: TheFastAndTheFleuryous
This trade/signing is looking worse by the game


He's a minus 2 with the Islanders so far and hasn't earned a point in five games. Yikes. I knew he wouldn't get as many points in New York, but I didn't think this would happen.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit