The salary distribution has to be wrong: isn't there that rule in which the salary can't diverge by more than 35%, year to year? Because in this case, it's a 57% hike from the first year to the second.
The salary distribution has to be wrong: isn't there that rule in which the salary can't diverge by more than 35%, year to year? Because in this case, it's a 57% hike from the first year to the second.
No I believe that it can't deviate from the cap hit by that amount. Salary can change as much as it wants. Guys like Seabrook are making $2M or so at the end of their deals IIRC.
The salary distribution has to be wrong: isn't there that rule in which the salary can't diverge by more than 35%, year to year? Because in this case, it's a 57% hike from the first year to the second.
No I believe that it can't deviate from the cap hit by that amount. Salary can change as much as it wants. Guys like Seabrook are making $2M or so at the end of their deals IIRC.
Seabrook is making $4.5M at the end of his deal. You might be thinking of Keith, who makes $2.65M, $2.1M, and $1.5 in the last three years of his deal, respectively. Keith's contract was signed before the most recent CBA was ratified and all those salary rules were implemented. Whereas Seabrook's conforms to the current CBA standards.
No I believe that it can't deviate from the cap hit by that amount. Salary can change as much as it wants. Guys like Seabrook are making $2M or so at the end of their deals IIRC.
Seabrook is making $4.5M at the end of his deal. You might be thinking of Keith, who makes $2.65M, $2.1M, and $1.5 in the last three years of his deal, respectively. Keith's contract was signed before the most recent CBA was ratified and all those salary rules were implemented. Whereas Seabrook's conforms to the current CBA standards.
Yeah you're right that is who i was thinking of. My mistake.