SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Signings

Columbus Blue Jackets signed Joonas Korpisalo (2 Years / $900,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Jun. 9, 2017 at 1:50 p.m.
#1
Joonas Korpisalo has signed a new contract with the Columbus Blue Jackets.
Standard Contract (Extension)
Comparable ContractsCOMPARE THIS CONTRACT
SIGNED BY: Jarmo Kekalainen
Length: 2 years
Value: $1,800,000
Expiry Status: RFA (Arb)
Cap % Tooltip: 1.23
Signing Team: Logo of the Columbus Blue JacketsColumbus Blue Jackets
Signing Date: Jun. 9, 2017
Source: @Aportzline

Joonas Korpisalo signed a 2 year, $1,800,000 contract with the Columbus Blue Jackets on Jun. 9, 2017. The contract has a cap hit of $900,000.

SEASONClauseCap HitTooltipAAV TooltipP. BonusesTooltipS. BonusesTooltipBase SalaryTooltipTotal SalaryTooltipMinors SalTooltip
2017-18$900,000$900,000$0$0$700,000$700,000$700,000
2018-19$900,000$900,000$0$0$1,100,000$1,100,000$1,100,000
TOTAL$1,800,000$1,800,000$0$0$1,800,000$1,800,000$1,800,000
Qualifying OfferTooltip: $1,100,000
Jun. 9, 2017 at 3:57 p.m.
#2
Below Market Value
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2015
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 1,324
Depending on how he plays, he could take over the starting job at the end of this contract, as it expires at the same time as Bobrovsky.
Jun. 9, 2017 at 4:06 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 90
Likes: 8
Good deal for a solid backup who has the potential to start in the near future.
Jun. 9, 2017 at 7:08 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2016
Posts: 6
Likes: 9
The salary distribution has to be wrong: isn't there that rule in which the salary can't diverge by more than 35%, year to year? Because in this case, it's a 57% hike from the first year to the second.
Jun. 9, 2017 at 7:19 p.m.
#5
NateElder12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 5,736
Likes: 801
Quoting: KL17
The salary distribution has to be wrong: isn't there that rule in which the salary can't diverge by more than 35%, year to year? Because in this case, it's a 57% hike from the first year to the second.


No I believe that it can't deviate from the cap hit by that amount. Salary can change as much as it wants. Guys like Seabrook are making $2M or so at the end of their deals IIRC.
Jun. 12, 2017 at 10:42 a.m.
#6
Below Market Value
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2015
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 1,324
Quoting: NateElder12
Quoting: KL17
The salary distribution has to be wrong: isn't there that rule in which the salary can't diverge by more than 35%, year to year? Because in this case, it's a 57% hike from the first year to the second.


No I believe that it can't deviate from the cap hit by that amount. Salary can change as much as it wants. Guys like Seabrook are making $2M or so at the end of their deals IIRC.


Seabrook is making $4.5M at the end of his deal. You might be thinking of Keith, who makes $2.65M, $2.1M, and $1.5 in the last three years of his deal, respectively. Keith's contract was signed before the most recent CBA was ratified and all those salary rules were implemented. Whereas Seabrook's conforms to the current CBA standards.
NateElder12 liked this.
Jun. 12, 2017 at 2:09 p.m.
#7
NateElder12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 5,736
Likes: 801
Quoting: DoctorBreakfast
Quoting: NateElder12


No I believe that it can't deviate from the cap hit by that amount. Salary can change as much as it wants. Guys like Seabrook are making $2M or so at the end of their deals IIRC.


Seabrook is making $4.5M at the end of his deal. You might be thinking of Keith, who makes $2.65M, $2.1M, and $1.5 in the last three years of his deal, respectively. Keith's contract was signed before the most recent CBA was ratified and all those salary rules were implemented. Whereas Seabrook's conforms to the current CBA standards.


Yeah you're right that is who i was thinking of. My mistake.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit