SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Timo Meier Price

Created by: dgibb10
Team: 2022-23 New Jersey Devils
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 8, 2023
Published: Feb. 8, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
An important thing to remember is that unlike most teams the devils would not be needing the sharks to retain salary, or if retention is needed it would be very minimal
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. Holtz, Alexander
  2. 2023 1st round pick (NJD)
  3. 2024 3rd round pick (NJD)
2.
NJD
    Timo Meier
    SJS
    1. Mukhamadullin, Shakir
    2. Sharangovich, Yegor
    3. 2024 1st round pick (NJD)
    Additional Details:
    Zetterlund could sub in for yegor
    Casey/Arseni for Shakir
    3.
    NJD
      Timo Meier
      SJS
      1. Casey, Seamus [Reserve List]
      2. Gritsyuk, Arseni [Reserve List]
      3. 2025 1st round pick (NJD)
      Additional Details:
      All 1sts are 2023 these are just possible trades.
      Would be willing to throw in another asset such as Walsh/Foote/Bahl/Daws/Mid round pick into any deal to get it over the finish line
      Buyouts
      Recapture Fees
      Buried
      DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
      2023
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      2024
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      2025
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
      22$82,500,000$78,771,625$0$482,500$3,728,375
      Left WingCentreRight Wing
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $6,000,000$6,000,000
      LW, RW
      NMC
      UFA - 5
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $8,000,000$8,000,000
      C
      UFA - 8
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $5,450,000$5,450,000
      RW, LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $3,000,000$3,000,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $7,250,000$7,250,000
      C
      UFA - 5
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $750,000$750,000
      RW
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $4,500,000$4,500,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $2,375,000$2,375,000
      C, LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
      RW, C
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $3,200,000$3,200,000
      LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $975,000$975,000
      C
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $825,000$825,000
      RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $874,125$874,125
      C, LW
      RFA - 1
      Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $3,166,667$3,166,667
      LD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $9,000,000$9,000,000
      RD
      NMC
      UFA - 6
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $3,400,000$3,400,000
      G
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $1,125,000$1,125,000
      LD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $4,400,000$4,400,000
      RD
      UFA - 5
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $2,800,000$2,800,000
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $1,100,000$1,100,000
      LD/RD, LW
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $4,166,666$4,166,666
      RD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $795,000$795,000 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
      LD
      RFA - 1
      ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $4,125,000$4,125,000
      G
      UFA - 1

      Embed Code

      • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
      • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

      Text-Embed

      Click to Highlight
      Feb. 8, 2023 at 4:37 p.m.
      #1
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2022
      Posts: 82
      Likes: 40
      You might be looking at sharangovich + holtz + a first/second similar in structure to the Pacioretty trade all those years ago. The retention aspect is in my opinion a non-factor because the Sharks have enough cap space and its an expiring contract so don't expect that to be a real advantage in trade talks.
      AStovetop liked this.
      Feb. 8, 2023 at 4:52 p.m.
      #2
      Stovetop
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2017
      Posts: 1,833
      Likes: 813
      I do like option 3 given the Sharks are getting quality prospects at D AND FW.

      My ideal is Holtz + Mukh + 2024 First (upgrades to 2023 First if NJ advances past the first round of the 2023 playoffs AND Timo scores 3+ goals in the playoffs)
      That way it guarantees that the 2023 First that NJ is giving up isn't like 18th overall. At minimum it would be 25th (if my math is correct)
      Feb. 8, 2023 at 5:21 p.m.
      #3
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2022
      Posts: 344
      Likes: 98
      Quoting: AStovetop
      I do like option 3 given the Sharks are getting quality prospects at D AND FW.

      My ideal is Holtz + Mukh + 2024 First (upgrades to 2023 First if NJ advances past the first round of the 2023 playoffs AND Timo scores 3+ goals in the playoffs)
      That way it guarantees that the 2023 First that NJ is giving up isn't like 18th overall. At minimum it would be 25th (if my math is correct)


      There is no need to Give up Holtz though so why do it. He's a potential 30-35+ goal scorer with 4 years+ of development left and still on a rookie contract. Not to mention the team's only real forward prospect. Hold onto him and move Muk since we have way too many D prospects or Shango who can frankly use more ice time elsewhere.
      Feb. 8, 2023 at 5:53 p.m.
      #4
      Thread Starter
      I Love J Boqvist
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2023
      Posts: 11,131
      Likes: 2,892
      Quoting: AStovetop
      I do like option 3 given the Sharks are getting quality prospects at D AND FW.

      My ideal is Holtz + Mukh + 2024 First (upgrades to 2023 First if NJ advances past the first round of the 2023 playoffs AND Timo scores 3+ goals in the playoffs)
      That way it guarantees that the 2023 First that NJ is giving up isn't like 18th overall. At minimum it would be 25th (if my math is correct)


      I'd counter with Holtz + Mukh + 2nd that becomes a 1st if the devils make the stanley cup finals this year, or an additional 2nd round pick if the devils win a cup in the next 3 years
      Feb. 8, 2023 at 6:58 p.m.
      #5
      Thread Starter
      I Love J Boqvist
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2023
      Posts: 11,131
      Likes: 2,892
      Quoting: rosenj
      You might be looking at sharangovich + holtz + a first/second similar in structure to the Pacioretty trade all those years ago. The retention aspect is in my opinion a non-factor because the Sharks have enough cap space and its an expiring contract so don't expect that to be a real advantage in trade talks.


      The money saved can be used to absorb a cap dump in another trade while accumulating assets so the retention is certainly worth something
      Feb. 9, 2023 at 10:35 a.m.
      #6
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2022
      Posts: 82
      Likes: 40
      Quoting: dgibb10
      The money saved can be used to absorb a cap dump in another trade while accumulating assets so the retention is certainly worth something


      I was thinking about that but even if they have to retain half of the salary in another deal, that would still leave them 5 million for a cap dump and it is unlikely there will be a move this TDL for a cap dump worth more than 5 especially because those moves are pretty rare at the deadline unless we're talking about retaining in a three team deal in which case they have more than enough to do that with 5 (especially if they make another move like Barabanov which would clear slightly more space). My main point is that the Sharks are incredibly unlikely to reject a better deal just because your deal gives them slightly more cap to make some hypothetical cap dump move that is unlikely to happen. It doesn't move the needle in a trade given their cap situation and so really for practical purposes its a non-factor.
       
      Reply
      To create a post please Login or Register
      Question:
      Options:
      Add Option
      Submit Poll