SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Deadline - Bigger

Created by: Propeller09
Team: 2022-23 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 9, 2023
Published: Feb. 9, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
BOS
  1. Lucic, Milan ($3,000,000 retained)
  2. Ruzicka, Adam
  3. 2023 4th round pick (CGY)
CGY
  1. Smith, Craig
  2. Zboril, Jakub
  3. 2023 3rd round pick (BOS)
2.
VAN
  1. Reilly, Mike
  2. Steen, Oskar
  3. 2024 3rd round pick (BOS)
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the LAK
2024
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2025
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$80,954,167$0$4,650,000$1,545,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,500,000$2,500,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000 (Performance Bonus$2,000,000$2M)
C
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,050,000$1,050,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,800,000$3,800,000
LW, C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$762,500$762,500
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LW, C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
NTC, NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
UFA - 8
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,687,500$3,687,500
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$150,000$150K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 9, 2023 at 6:45 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 146
Likes: 27
Hunting for the big boys. Basically three beasts right there.
Feb. 9, 2023 at 6:51 p.m.
#2
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,795
Likes: 1,835
You’re Dreaming 💭
Feb. 9, 2023 at 6:51 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 10,066
Likes: 9,329
Canucks pass. Reilly probably costs a 3rd to dump, and Schenn costs a 2nd, not an AHL player
majormoose007 liked this.
Feb. 9, 2023 at 6:58 p.m.
#4
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,936
Likes: 3,578
Right idea in that Vancouver trade but the cost would be bigger. Since the bruins don’t have a 2023 or 2024 2nd round pick that trade pretty much only happens if they give up their first this year, which I’m going to assume is more than Boston wants to do
Feb. 9, 2023 at 7:02 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 700
Likes: 138
I didn’t think you could retain more than half a salary.
Feb. 9, 2023 at 7:11 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,578
Likes: 5,454
Trade Smith to clear cap, not replacing him by another overpaid 4th liner. Bruins give up the better defenseman in the Canucks trade plus Steen and the 3rd to have Schenn as a scratch. Again, it doesn't help.
Feb. 9, 2023 at 7:26 p.m.
#7
Ktownchef
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 415
Likes: 172
I'm literally copying and pasting this from another thread with the exact same trade.

Canucks wouldn't take a contract back to get what will essentially be a third round draft pick since the Bruins pick will be the last pick in round 2. Especially one with more term then Schenn has.
Feb. 9, 2023 at 7:39 p.m.
#8
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,280
Likes: 10,619
Quoting: Bruinadian67
I didn’t think you could retain more than half a salary.


You shouldn't be able to
Feb. 9, 2023 at 7:40 p.m.
#9
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,280
Likes: 10,619
@banks is this a bug on Lucic? Should be around 2.5 mill retention as max, not 3
Feb. 9, 2023 at 7:40 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 639
Quoting: bhavikp27
Trade Smith to clear cap, not replacing him by another overpaid 4th liner. Bruins give up the better defenseman in the Canucks trade plus Steen and the 3rd to have Schenn as a scratch. Again, it doesn't help.


It's depth. Big, strong, depth.

I'd rotate based on who they are playing. Someone will miss games. Zboril has a higher ceiling, but very inconsistent. Schenn is what he is.

Lucic is a force. He fits the chemistry the team has and would be 12th/13th setting a tone. Or at the very least, making guys think twice about running 48 and 25 through the boards.

Ruzicka - I could live without. Like the player, but probably wouldn't.crack linep. Was thinking more about Nosek's departure in the offseason.
Feb. 9, 2023 at 7:41 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 639
Quoting: Gmonwy
You shouldn't be able to


I did 3m. Not sure why it's showing that way.
Feb. 9, 2023 at 7:45 p.m.
#12
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,280
Likes: 10,619
Quoting: Propeller09
I did 3m. Not sure why it's showing that way.


3 mill isn't allowed
Feb. 9, 2023 at 7:54 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 639
Quoting: Ktownchef
I'm literally copying and pasting this from another thread with the exact same trade.

Canucks wouldn't take a contract back to get what will essentially be a third round draft pick since the Bruins pick will be the last pick in round 2. Especially one with more term then Schenn has.


Hopefully my trade was first?

My thought process was Reilly is an NHL dman. He is just redudant on the Bruins. He's a good bottom pair and could run a pp2. Calgary could retain and flip for a 3rd to a contender.

Steen, I don't - Vancouver seems to do ok with Swedes. In all seriousness, he's NHL caliber. Scene change would ne good for him. Not a world beater, but serviceable bottom 6 for cheap.

Why does evwryone think schenn will fetch a lot? He is a 7th dman. A 3rd would be as high as I would go. Steen is basically to take Reilly's $. I do think they could flip him.

Not sure if they have enough rentention slots open though. Basically buying picks for a team that should be backnin the playoffs next year.
Feb. 9, 2023 at 7:55 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 639
Quoting: Gmonwy
3 mill isn't allowed


Why - 50% of 6m, right?
Feb. 9, 2023 at 7:56 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 639
Quoting: Propeller09
Why - 50% of 6m, right?


Nevermind. Just realized.
Feb. 9, 2023 at 7:58 p.m.
#16
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,280
Likes: 10,619
Quoting: Propeller09
Why - 50% of 6m, right?


Edmonton held 750k
Propeller09 and majormoose007 liked this.
Feb. 9, 2023 at 8:02 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,578
Likes: 5,454
Quoting: Propeller09
It's depth. Big, strong, depth.

I'd rotate based on who they are playing. Someone will miss games. Zboril has a higher ceiling, but very inconsistent. Schenn is what he is.

Lucic is a force. He fits the chemistry the team has and would be 12th/13th setting a tone. Or at the very least, making guys think twice about running 48 and 25 through the boards.

Ruzicka - I could live without. Like the player, but probably wouldn't.crack linep. Was thinking more about Nosek's departure in the offseason.


Honestly, Ruzicka might be more interesting to add than Lucic. The latter is too slow nowadays. Also, Bruins had Lucic, Chara, Thornton, etc. and Savard, Eriksson still got cheapshotted.

The problem is not Schenn itself but the price (an overpay) to acquire him. If he would be a regular, maybe I'd consider it. To be the 7th D? Pass.
Feb. 9, 2023 at 9:11 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 1,057
Canucks decline. The ask for Schenn is a 2nd. 3rd is one round later, and Steen doesn't add enough to bridge the gap between a 2nd and 3rd. Canucks want to clear cap and also wouldn't take a multi-year cap dump in Reilly back for anything short of a 1st probably. If the Bruins are adamant about including Reilly, the Canucks can just turn around and find someone else who will give up a 2nd straight up for Schenn.
Feb. 10, 2023 at 8:41 a.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 639
Quoting: Epic_Ninja_Dude
Canucks decline. The ask for Schenn is a 2nd. 3rd is one round later, and Steen doesn't add enough to bridge the gap between a 2nd and 3rd. Canucks want to clear cap and also wouldn't take a multi-year cap dump in Reilly back for anything short of a 1st probably. If the Bruins are adamant about including Reilly, the Canucks can just turn around and find someone else who will give up a 2nd straight up for Schenn.


I am not sure a 2nd is realistic. He is legit a 6th or 7th dman. Especially on a good team. Tb let him go for 850k, I don't see them giving a 2nd.

I guess we'll see.
Feb. 10, 2023 at 11:01 a.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 297
Likes: 59
Quoting: Gmonwy
banks is this a bug on Lucic? Should be around 2.5 mill retention as max, not 3


lucic cap hit is 6 mil , edm already retained 750 so calgary can in fact retain half his orginal cap hit which is 3 mil
Feb. 10, 2023 at 11:05 a.m.
#21
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,280
Likes: 10,619
Quoting: Mikej
lucic cap hit is 6 mil , edm already retained 750 so calgary can in fact retain half his orginal cap hit which is 3 mil


Im pretty sure they can only retain half on what they have
Feb. 10, 2023 at 2:54 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 297
Likes: 59
Quoting: Gmonwy
Im pretty sure they can only retain half on what they have


just looked at the cba, retained salary pertains to the original amount in all transactions , happened with devon dubynk most recently , edmonton traded him to nashville and retained 50% which was 1.75 m, nashville traded him to montreal and retained 25% ,875,0000 . using the same math lucics cap hit could get as low as 2 250,000
Feb. 10, 2023 at 8:58 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 1,057
Quoting: Propeller09
I am not sure a 2nd is realistic. He is legit a 6th or 7th dman. Especially on a good team. Tb let him go for 850k, I don't see them giving a 2nd.

I guess we'll see.


Reports are the Canucks already declined a 2nd for him last deadline. Justin Braun got a 3rd last deadline with a stat line of 61 GP, 16 PTS, +3, 114 Blocks, 79 Hits. Schenn has 51 GP, 18 PTS, +8, 77 Blocks, 244 Hits. Schenn beats Braun in every category except blocked shots with 10 less games played, and comes in at half the cap hit of Braun. GM's also often give up a lot more than expected for these kind of physical, hard-hitting, 3rd pair d-men (as proven by Chiarot getting a 1st+). Asking for a 2nd definitely seems to be around market value for Schenn.
Feb. 12, 2023 at 2:54 p.m.
#24
Follow capfriendly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 1336
Posts: 2,666
Likes: 1,918
Quoting: Gmonwy
banks is this a bug on Lucic? Should be around 2.5 mill retention as max, not 3


Does appear to be, yes
Gmonwy liked this.
Feb. 12, 2023 at 4:20 p.m.
#25
Follow capfriendly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 1336
Posts: 2,666
Likes: 1,918
Quoting: Gmonwy
banks is this a bug on Lucic? Should be around 2.5 mill retention as max, not 3


Bug fix is coming, players in the trade list will display their current cap hit properly (Lucic was displaying as $6M, that will be fixed), and the retained 50% limit will be properly enforced.
Gmonwy liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll