Quoting: JaredOfLondon
mantha has the exact same amount of points as kerfoot does and costs significantly more even with retention, why are the leafs doing this?
Quoting: RipNasty
Hits!!!!!!!!!!
He has an excellent shot but it's usually taken from the cheap seats. Total perimeter player. I had such high hopes for Mo. But he only proved why he fell in the draft to Detroit. He's more spectator than player.[/quote]
Yeah, Mantha was once a really good player in terms of talent, he had a shot, it's not just because he's a big body. They have the same production this year, so the question is what would the Leafs be missing here? It would be Kerfoot's contribution to pk and his ability to play C, so the assumption here is that they do find an internal replacement for him. If Mantha, can find his scoring touch again, then it's an overall upgrade. If not then they have a problem at 4.56m, that's why I said it's unlikely, but maybe Dubas can find a way to reduce the risk.
For next year, Kerfoot is unlikely to signing a 1-year deal to stay with the Leafs, so it's either they let him walk or bring him back with a raise (probably 3.75-4.5m). Those extra years could complicate things.
Quoting: MoreHitzSeider
Mantha is all skill and no compete. Every once in awhile he'll look amazing. But then he'll return to being who he is. A big, lazy floater making too much money who doesn't contribute much. Stay away from him. You'll regret acquiring him.
Yeah, maybe at 4.65m it would be too much of a gamble. Another concern would be his injury history. Low compete levels would be a major turnoff for sure, but the losing in Detroit probably got to him, and the Caps have had their own struggles as well.